Contrast-enhanced and targeted ultrasound.

Ultrasonic imaging is becoming the most popular medical imaging modality, owing to the low price per examination and its safety. However, blood is a poor scatterer of ultrasound waves at clinical diagnostic transmit frequencies. For perfusion imaging, markers have been designed to enhance the contrast in B-mode imaging. These so-called ultrasound contrast agents consist of microscopically small gas bubbles encapsulated in biodegradable shells. In this review, the physical principles of ultrasound contrast agent microbubble behavior and their adjustment for drug delivery including sonoporation are described. Furthermore, an outline of clinical imaging applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound is given. It is a challenging task to quantify and predict which bubble phenomenon occurs under which acoustic condition, and how these phenomena may be utilized in ultrasonic imaging. Aided by high-speed photography, our improved understanding of encapsulated microbubble behavior will lead to more sophisticated detection and delivery techniques. More sophisticated methods use quantitative approaches to measure the amount and the time course of bolus or reperfusion curves, and have shown great promise in revealing effective tumor responses to anti-angiogenic drugs in humans before tumor shrinkage occurs. These are beginning to be accepted into clinical practice. In the long term, targeted microbubbles for molecular imaging and eventually for directed anti-tumor therapy are expected to be tested.

[1]  Surrey Sm,et al.  Guidelines for the Safe use of Diagnostic Ultrasound Equipment , 2000 .

[2]  N. Lassau,et al.  Évaluation de l’angiogénèse tumorale à l’aide de l’échographie de contraste , 2009 .

[3]  R. Karshafian,et al.  Ultrasound-induced uptake of different size markers in mammalian cells , 2005, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005..

[4]  Paul A. Dayton,et al.  Optical observation of lipid- and polymer-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents , 2004 .

[5]  R. Karshafian,et al.  The influence of fragmentation on the acoustic response from shrinking bubbles. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  G. Zamboni,et al.  Ultrasonography of the pancreas. 4. Contrast-enhanced imaging , 2007, Abdominal Imaging.

[7]  M. Bosio,et al.  Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) - Update 2008 , 2008, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[8]  A. Webb,et al.  Introduction to biomedical imaging , 2002 .

[9]  Dhiman Chatterjee,et al.  Characterization of ultrasound contrast microbubbles using in vitro experiments and viscous and viscoelastic interface models for encapsulation. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Morton W. Miller,et al.  A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  Michael Delius,et al.  Extracorporeal shock waves for gene therapy? , 1995, The Lancet.

[12]  D. Crossman,et al.  Ultrasound-enhanced transgene expression in vascular cells is not dependent upon cavitation-induced free radicals. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  Nico de Jong,et al.  High-speed photography during ultrasound illustrates potential therapeutic applications of microbubbles. , 2005, Medical physics.

[14]  Aspherical bubble collapse–comparison with simulations , 2000 .

[15]  G. Carrafiello,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonograpic Findings in Pancreatic Tumors , 2008, International journal of medical sciences.

[16]  J D Thomas,et al.  Ten-fold augmentation of endothelial uptake of vascular endothelial growth factor with ultrasound after systemic administration. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  F. T. ten Cate,et al.  Effects of diagnostic ultrasound parameters on molecular uptake and cell viability , 2002, 2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings..

[18]  Paul A. Dayton,et al.  Radiation-Force Assisted Targeting Facilitates Ultrasonic Molecular Imaging , 2004 .

[19]  E. Stride,et al.  Theoretical and experimental investigation of the behaviour of ultrasound contrast agent particles in whole blood. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  T. Kondo,et al.  Enhanced ultrasound‐induced apoptosis and cell lysis by a hypotonic medium , 2004, International journal of radiation biology.

[21]  Kishan Dholakia,et al.  Membrane disruption by optically controlled microbubble cavitation , 2005 .

[22]  A. Roche,et al.  [Evaluation of early response to antiangiogenic treatment with dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound]. , 2008, Journal de radiologie.

[23]  D. Cumberland,et al.  Ultrasound Gene Therapy: On the Road from Concept to Reality , 2001, Echocardiography.

[24]  M. Versluis,et al.  Ultrasound-induced coalescence of free gas microbubbles , 2004, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2004.

[25]  K. Abe,et al.  Differential diagnosis of hepatic nodules using delayed parenchymal phase imaging of levovist contrast ultrasound: comparative study with SPIO-MRI. , 2004, Hepatology research : the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology.

[26]  L. Bolondi,et al.  Recent advances in the imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma. From ultrasound to positron emission tomography scan. , 2007, Saudi medical journal.

[27]  P. Dayton,et al.  Spatio-temporal dynamics of an encapsulated gas bubble in an ultrasound field. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Ultrasound radiation force enables targeted deposition of model drug carriers loaded on microbubbles. , 2006, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[29]  R. Pozzi Mucelli,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of the pancreas. , 2007, JOP : Journal of the pancreas.

[30]  G. Ferraioli,et al.  Contrast-enhanced sonography in the characterization of small hepatocellular carcinomas in cirrhotic patients: comparison with contrast-enhanced ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging. , 2007, Anticancer research.

[31]  Ultrasonography of the pancreas. , 1991 .

[32]  R. Karshafian,et al.  An acoustic study of disruption of polymer-shelled bubbles [microbubble contrast agents] , 2004, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2004.

[33]  Cristina Pislaru,et al.  Optimization of ultrasound-mediated gene transfer: comparison of contrast agents and ultrasound modalities. , 2003, European heart journal.

[34]  K. Takayama,et al.  Dynamic behavior of bubbles during extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[35]  A. Prosperetti,et al.  Bubble Dynamics and Cavitation , 1977 .

[36]  P M Shankar,et al.  Subharmonic generation from ultrasonic contrast agents. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  Jets from collapsing bubbles , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[38]  Georg Schmitz,et al.  Bubble dynamics involved in ultrasonic imaging , 2006, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[39]  S. Takeuchi,et al.  Apoptosis Induction in Cancer Cells by Ultrasound Exposure , 2004 .

[40]  T. Porter,et al.  Therapeutic Ultrasound for Gene Delivery , 2001, Echocardiography.

[41]  S. Kaul,et al.  Delivery of Drugs with Ultrasound , 2001, Echocardiography.

[42]  P. Dayton,et al.  Influence of lipid shell physicochemical properties on ultrasound-induced microbubble destruction , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[43]  C. Nicolau,et al.  Evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma using SonoVue, a second generation ultrasound contrast agent: correlation with cellular differentiation , 2004, European Radiology.

[44]  F. T. ten Cate,et al.  Radionuclide tumour therapy with ultrasound contrast microbubbles. , 2004, Ultrasonics.

[45]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Theoretical investigation of the response of gas‐filled micropores and cavitation nuclei to ultrasound , 1983 .

[46]  Ji Song,et al.  Influence of injection site, microvascular pressure and ultrasound variables on microbubble-mediated delivery of microspheres to muscle. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[47]  Daniel M. Hallow,et al.  Measurement and correlation of acoustic cavitation with cellular bioeffects , 2004 .

[48]  Georg Schmitz,et al.  Phospholipid-stabilized microbubbles: Influence of shell chemistry on cavitation threshold and binding to giant uni-lamellar vesicles , 2009 .

[49]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Insonation facilitates plasmid DNA transfection into the central nervous system and microbubbles enhance the effect. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[50]  P. Dayton,et al.  Experimental and theoretical evaluation of microbubble behavior: effect of transmitted phase and bubble size , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[51]  A. Klibanov,et al.  Targeted delivery of gas-filled microspheres, contrast agents for ultrasound imaging. , 1999, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[52]  Georg Schmitz,et al.  Ultrasonic bubbles in medicine: influence of the shell. , 2007, Ultrasonics sonochemistry.

[53]  Vassilis Sboros,et al.  A numerical investigation of the resonance of gas-filled microbubbles: resonance dependence on acoustic pressure amplitude. , 2004, Ultrasonics.

[54]  Y. Takeuchi,et al.  Industrial use thermoplastic microballoon to mimic the contrast agents and its in-vitro behavior including released gas dynamics , 1997, 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.97CH36118).

[55]  F. Izzo,et al.  Local ablation procedures in primary liver tumors: Levovist US versus spiral CTto evaluate therapeutic results. , 2003, Anticancer research.

[56]  P. Dayton,et al.  Threshold of fragmentation for ultrasonic contrast agents. , 2001, Journal of biomedical optics.

[57]  Conrad Coester,et al.  Microbubbles as ultrasound triggered drug carriers. , 2009, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[58]  M. Postema,et al.  Shell rupture threshold, fragmentation threshold, blake threshold , 2005, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005..

[59]  P Tortoli,et al.  On the interaction between ultrasound and contrast agents during Doppler investigations. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[60]  K. Tachibana,et al.  The Use of Ultrasound for Drug Delivery , 2001, Echocardiography.

[61]  Christopher E. Brennen,et al.  Fission of collapsing cavitation bubbles , 2002, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[62]  M. Kohno,et al.  Treatment of acute myocardial infarction by hepatocyte growth factor gene transfer: the first demonstration of myocardial transfer of a "functional" gene using ultrasonic microbubble destruction. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[63]  Xiao-Ling Yu,et al.  Comparison of contrast enhanced ultrasound and contrast enhanced CT or MRI in monitoring percutaneous thermal ablation procedure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a multi-center study in China. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[64]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Lithotripter shock waves with cavitation nucleation agents produce tumor growth reduction and gene transfer in vivo. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[65]  Sanjiv Kaul,et al.  Myocardial contrast echocardiography: a 25-year retrospective. , 2008, Circulation.

[66]  D Becker,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the characterization of focal liver lesions--diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice (DEGUM multicenter trial). , 2008, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[67]  W. Lauterborn,et al.  Cavitation erosion by single laser-produced bubbles , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[68]  M. D’Onofrio,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) of the pancreas , 2007 .

[69]  S. Koscielny,et al.  Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Sunitinib: Early Evaluation of Treatment Response Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[70]  G. Torzilli Contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography in surgery for liver tumors. , 2004, European journal of radiology.

[71]  Linda Chami,et al.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with imatinib: monitoring response with contrast-enhanced sonography. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[72]  Thierry Bettinger,et al.  Plasma membrane poration induced by ultrasound exposure: implication for drug delivery. , 2005, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[73]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Ultrasonic enhancement of gene transfection in murine melanoma tumors. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[74]  Charles C. Church,et al.  The effects of an elastic solid surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas bubbles , 1995 .

[75]  Niek N. Sanders,et al.  Drug loaded microbubble design for ultrasound triggered delivery , 2009 .

[76]  Georg Schmitz,et al.  Discussion of the application of finite Volterra series for the modeling of the oscillation behavior of ultrasound contrast agents , 2009 .

[77]  Raffi Bekeredjian,et al.  Optimization of ultrasound parameters for cardiac gene delivery of adenoviral or plasmid deoxyribonucleic acid by ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[78]  Raffi Bekeredjian,et al.  Use of ultrasound contrast agents for gene or drug delivery in cardiovascular medicine. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[79]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Molecular ultrasound imaging using microbubble contrast agents. , 2007, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[80]  S. Koscielny,et al.  Prognostic value of angiogenesis evaluated with high-frequency and colour Doppler sonography for preoperative assessment of primary cutaneous melanomas: correlation with recurrence after a 5 year follow-up period , 2006, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

[81]  J F Greenleaf,et al.  Artificial cavitation nuclei significantly enhance acoustically induced cell transfection. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[82]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Ultrasound-induced microbubble coalescence. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[83]  L Solbiati,et al.  Guidelines for the use of contrast agents in ultrasound. January 2004. , 2004, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[84]  Katherine W Ferrara,et al.  Ultrasound contrast microbubbles in imaging and therapy: physical principles and engineering , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[85]  Paul A. Dayton,et al.  Optical observation of contrast agent destruction , 2000 .

[86]  RyuichiMorishita,et al.  Local Delivery of Plasmid DNA Into Rat Carotid Artery Using Ultrasound , 2002 .

[87]  C. Ohl,et al.  Shock-wave-induced jetting of micron-size bubbles. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[88]  Sanjiv Kaul,et al.  Targeted tissue transfection with ultrasound destruction of plasmid-bearing cationic microbubbles. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[89]  A Roche,et al.  Dynamic assessment of antiangiogenic therapy by monitoring both tumoral vascularization and tissue degeneration , 2007, Gene Therapy.

[90]  Vassilis Sboros,et al.  Response of contrast agents to ultrasound. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[91]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  The magnitude of radiation force on ultrasound contrast agents. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[92]  K. Nightingale,et al.  A preliminary evaluation of the effects of primary and secondary radiation forces on acoustic contrast agents , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[93]  K J Wolf,et al.  Detection and characterisation of liver metastases. , 2004, European radiology.

[94]  Katsuyuki Yamamoto,et al.  Sonoporation by single-shot pulsed ultrasound with microbubbles adjacent to cells. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[95]  T. Kondo,et al.  Contributions of mechanical and sonochemical effects to cell membrane damage induced by single-shot pulsed ultrasound with adjacent microbubbles , 2008, Journal of Medical Ultrasonics.

[96]  Odd Helge Gilja,et al.  Ultrasound-directed drug delivery. , 2007, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.

[97]  Meng-Xing Tang,et al.  Physical Phenomena Affecting Quantitative Imaging of Ultrasound Contrast Agent , 2009 .

[98]  E. Unger,et al.  Therapeutic applications of microbubbles , 2001 .

[99]  R. Guy,et al.  Ultrasound-mediated gene delivery: kinetics of plasmid internalization and gene expression. , 2005, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[100]  M. Postema,et al.  Mutual Attraction of Oscillating Microbubbles , 2007 .

[101]  J. Hossack,et al.  Acoustic radiation force enhances targeted delivery of ultrasound contrast microbubbles: in vitro verification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[102]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  DNA transfer and cell killing in epidermoid cells by diagnostic ultrasound activation of contrast agent gas bodies in vitro. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[103]  P. Tortoli,et al.  Acoustical Imaging of Individual Microbubbles , 2007 .

[104]  L. Hoff,et al.  Oscillations of polymeric microbubbles: effect of the encapsulating shell , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[105]  Eleanor Stride,et al.  On the destruction of microbubble ultrasound contrast agents. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[106]  F. T. ten Cate,et al.  Nitric oxide delivery by ultrasonic cracking: some limitations. , 2006, Ultrasonics.

[107]  G. Torzilli,et al.  Use of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography during liver surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastases – Its impact on operative outcome. Analysis of a prospective cohort study☆ , 2008 .

[108]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Transfection of a reporter plasmid into cultured cells by sonoporation in vitro. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[109]  E. Unger,et al.  Gene Delivery Using Ultrasound Contrast Agents , 2001, Echocardiography.

[110]  J. Morris,et al.  Sonoporation of cultured cells in the rotating tube exposure system. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[111]  Katherine W Ferrara,et al.  Dynamics of therapeutic ultrasound contrast agents. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[112]  Gail ter Haar,et al.  Safety and bio-effects of ultrasound contrast agents , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[113]  E. Hahn,et al.  [Detection of liver metastases--comparison of contrast--enhanced ultrasound using first versus second generation contrast agents]. , 2003, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[114]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Membrane damage thresholds for 1- to 10-MHz pulsed ultrasound exposure of phagocytic cells loaded with contrast agent gas bodies in vitro. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[115]  M. Postema,et al.  Noninvasive microbubble-based pressure measurements: a simulation study. , 2004, Ultrasonics.

[116]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Apoptosis signals in lymphoblasts induced by focused ultrasound , 2004, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[117]  E. Leen The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the characterisation of focal liver leasions , 2001, European Radiology.

[118]  K. Yan,et al.  Diagnosis of small hepatic nodules detected by surveillance ultrasound in patients with cirrhosis: Comparison between contrast‐enhanced ultrasound and contrast‐enhanced helical computed tomography , 2008, Hepatology research : the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology.

[119]  M. Versluis,et al.  Ultrasound-induced gas release from contrast agent microbubbles , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[120]  N. Vandewalle,et al.  Fluid instabilities in the birth and death of antibubbles , 2003 .

[121]  G. Schmitz Ultrasound in Medical Diagnosis , 2002 .

[122]  T. Leighton The Acoustic Bubble , 1994 .

[123]  P. Wells,et al.  Ultrasonic imaging of the human body , 1999 .

[124]  Wenping Wang,et al.  Imaging of Focal Liver Lesions , 2005, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[125]  A. Roche,et al.  valuation prcoce des traitements anti-angiogniques par chographie dynamique de contraste , 2008 .

[126]  H. Saeger,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to detect liver metastases : a prospective trial to compare transcutaneous unenhanced and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in patients undergoing laparotomy. , 2007, International journal of colorectal disease.

[127]  T. Matula,et al.  Using light scattering to measure the response of individual ultrasound contrast microbubbles subjected to pulsed ultrasound in vitro. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[128]  Odd Helge Gilja,et al.  Strain during gastric contractions can be measured using Doppler ultrasonography. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[129]  M Claudon,et al.  [Guidelines for the use of contrast agents in ultrasound]. , 2005, Journal de radiologie.

[130]  Michiel Postema,et al.  Microfoam formation in a capillary. , 2010, Ultrasonics.

[131]  P. Tortoli,et al.  Different effects of microbubble destruction and translation in Doppler measurements , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[132]  A. Nordon,et al.  Analysis of the Rayleigh-Plesset equation with chirp excitation , 2008 .

[133]  Raffi Karshafian,et al.  Quantitative measurement of ultrasound disruption of polymer-shelled microbubbles. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[134]  R. Mettin,et al.  Translational instability of a spherical bubble in a standing ultrasound wave , 2009 .

[135]  J. Voigt Ultrasound molecular imaging. , 2009, Methods.

[136]  W. Mcdicken,et al.  Quantification of microbubble destruction of three fluorocarbon-filled ultrasonic contrast agents. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[137]  P. Dayton,et al.  A method for radiation-force localized drug delivery using gas-filled lipospheres , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[138]  J. Riess,et al.  Injectable microbubbles as contrast agents for diagnostic ultrasound imaging: the key role of perfluorochemicals. , 2003, Angewandte Chemie.

[139]  J. Bruix,et al.  Diagnosis of hepatic nodules 20 mm or smaller in cirrhosis: Prospective validation of the noninvasive diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma , 2007, Hepatology.

[140]  Hairong Zheng,et al.  Theoretical predictions of harmonic generation from submicron ultrasound contrast agents for nonlinear biomedical ultrasound imaging , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[141]  Limor Chen,et al.  Targeted anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 therapy leads to short-term and long-term impairment of vascular function and increase in tumor hypoxia. , 2006, Cancer research.

[142]  P. Dayton,et al.  Simultaneous optical and acoustical observations of contrast agents , 1997, 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.97CH36118).

[143]  Mark R Prausnitz,et al.  Mechanism of intracellular delivery by acoustic cavitation. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[144]  M. Falconi,et al.  Neuroendocrine pancreatic tumor: value of contrast enhanced ultrasonography. , 2004, Abdominal imaging.

[145]  M. Oudkerk,et al.  Assessment of metastatic liver disease in patients with primary extrahepatic tumors by contrast-enhanced sonography versus CT and MRI. , 2006, World journal of gastroenterology.

[146]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Membrane damage thresholds for pulsed or continuous ultrasound in phagocytic cells loaded with contrast agent gas bodies. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[147]  Koichi Ogawa,et al.  Induction of cell-membrane porosity by ultrasound , 1999, The Lancet.

[148]  M. Strasberg,et al.  Gas Bubbles as Sources of Sound in Liquids , 1956 .

[149]  Michiel Postema,et al.  Fundamentals of Medical Ultrasonics , 2011 .

[150]  K. Hosho,et al.  Qualitative assessment of tumor vascularity in hepatocellular carcinoma by contrast-enhanced coded ultrasound: comparison with arterial phase of dynamic CT and conventional color/power Doppler ultrasound , 2004, European Radiology.

[151]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Ultrasound-induced encapsulated microbubble phenomena. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[152]  Odd Helge Gilja,et al.  Morphology and motor function of the gastrointestinal tract examined with endosonography. , 2006, World journal of gastroenterology.

[153]  R. Shohet,et al.  DNA-loaded albumin microbubbles enhance ultrasound-mediated transfection in vitro. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.