Challenges and opportunities in image guided particle therapy

The application of biomedical imaging and image processing to radiation therapy with accelerated particles has unique challenges. The potential of particle therapy to precisely tailor the dose distribution around the target volume needs to account for the intrinsic sensitivity to uncertainties in dose deposition. These peculiar features motivate the use of image guided methods to consistently verify the accuracy in dose delivery. Dedicated imaging and image processing methods are required, from treatment planning to treatment verification phases, in order to reduce the effects of uncertainties. The scenario is also complicated by the lack of standardized layouts of treatment bunkers, which implies the relatively increased use of custom solutions. Conversely, imaging can be applied to verify the actual delivered dose, representing a valuable opportunity to validate specific protocols and visualize the efficacy of the intended treatment. In this contribution, challenges and opportunities in image guided particle therapy are overviewed, with a clear focus on research perspectives in biomedical imaging and image processing.

[1]  Paolo Zaffino,et al.  Contrast-enhanced proton radiography for patient set-up by using x-ray CT prior knowledge. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Karin Haustermans,et al.  The value of magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning. , 2014, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[3]  J. N. Bradbury,et al.  The Application of Protons to Computed Tomography , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[4]  Barbara Kaser-Hotz,et al.  First proton radiography of an animal patient. , 2004, Medical physics.

[5]  D. Jaffray.  Image-guided radiotherapy: from current concept to future perspectives , 2012, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[6]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Patient study of in vivo verification of beam delivery and range, using positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging after proton therapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Oliver Jäkel,et al.  Particle therapy at the Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT) - Integrated research-driven university-hospital-based radiation oncology service in Heidelberg, Germany. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  Joao Seco,et al.  Tissue decomposition from dual energy CT data for MC based dose calculation in particle therapy. , 2014, Medical physics.

[9]  Gregory C Sharp,et al.  In vivo proton beam range verification using spine MRI changes. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Francesca Albertini,et al.  Sensitivity of intensity modulated proton therapy plans to changes in patient weight. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  Marco Riboldi,et al.  Real-time tumour tracking in particle therapy: technological developments and future perspectives. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[12]  Hirohiko Tsujii,et al.  Acoustic pulse generated in a patient during treatment by pulsed proton radiation beam , 1995 .

[13]  Maurizio Amichetti,et al.  In-gantry or remote patient positioning? Monte Carlo simulations for proton therapy centers of different sizes. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  Range uncertainty in proton therapy due to variable biological effectiveness. , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  G Baroni,et al.  Commissioning and Quality Assurance of an Integrated System for Patient Positioning and Setup Verification in Particle Therapy , 2014, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[16]  Chan Hyeong Kim,et al.  Prompt gamma measurements for locating the dose falloff region in the proton therapy , 2006 .

[17]  Eros Pedroni,et al.  Improving the precision and performance of proton pencil beam scanning , 2012 .

[18]  Wei Chen,et al.  Including robustness in multi-criteria optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  D Thorwarth,et al.  Functional imaging for radiotherapy treatment planning: current status and future directions—a review , 2015, The British journal of radiology.

[20]  G Baroni,et al.  Image guided particle therapy in CNAO room 2: implementation and clinical validation. , 2015, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[21]  Hsiao-Ming Lu,et al.  A potential method for in vivo range verification in proton therapy treatment , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  J. V. van Loon,et al.  Evaluation of novel radiotherapy technologies: what evidence is needed to assess their clinical and cost effectiveness, and how should we get it? , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[23]  K Parodi,et al.  Ionoacoustic characterization of the proton Bragg peak with submillimeter accuracy. , 2015, Medical physics.

[24]  Lei Dong,et al.  Physics controversies in proton therapy. , 2013, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[25]  Michael Scholz,et al.  Assessment of potential advantages of relevant ions for particle therapy: a model based study. , 2015, Medical physics.

[26]  Gregory C Sharp,et al.  Scale invariant feature transform in adaptive radiation therapy: a tool for deformable image registration assessment and re-planning indication , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  Katia Parodi,et al.  In-beam PET measurements of β+ radioactivity induced by proton beams , 2002 .

[28]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Investigating CT to CBCT image registration for head and neck proton therapy as a tool for daily dose recalculation. , 2015, Medical physics.