Formal Methods for Hopfield-Like Networks

Building a meaningful model of biological regulatory network is usually done by specifying the components (e.g. the genes) and their interactions, by guessing the values of parameters, by comparing the predicted behaviors to the observed ones, and by modifying in a trial-error process both architecture and parameters in order to reach an optimal fitness. We propose here a different approach to construct and analyze biological models avoiding the trial-error part, where structure and dynamics are represented as formal constraints. We apply the method to Hopfield-like networks, a formalism often used in both neural and regulatory networks modeling. The aim is to characterize automatically the set of all models consistent with all the available knowledge (about structure and behavior). The available knowledge is formalized into formal constraints. The latter are compiled into Boolean formula in conjunctive normal form and then submitted to a Boolean satisfiability solver. This approach allows to formulate a wide range of queries, expressed in a high level language, and possibly integrating formalized intuitions. In order to explore its potential, we use it to find cycles for 3-nodes networks and to determine the flower morphogenesis regulatory network of Arabidopsis thaliana. Applications of this technique are numerous and concern the building of models from data as well as the design of biological networks possessing specified behaviors.

[1]  Mats Carlsson,et al.  An Open-Ended Finite Domain Constraint Solver , 1997, PLILP.

[2]  Jacques Demongeot,et al.  Genetic regulation networks: circuits, regulons and attractors. , 2003, Comptes rendus biologies.

[3]  Adrien Richard,et al.  Negative circuits and sustained oscillations in asynchronous automata networks , 2009, Adv. Appl. Math..

[4]  Sarma Vrudhula,et al.  Prediction of Pairwise Gene Interaction Using Threshold Logic , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Niklas Sörensson,et al.  An Extensible SAT-solver , 2003, SAT.

[6]  Adrien Elena,et al.  Robustesse des réseaux d'automates booléens à seuil aux modes d'itération. Application à la modélisation des réseaux de régulation génétique. (Robustness of threshold boolean automata networks to iteration modes. Application to genetic regulation network modelling) , 2009 .

[7]  Denis Thieffry,et al.  Graphic requirements for multistability and attractive cycles in a Boolean dynamical framework , 2008, Adv. Appl. Math..

[8]  J. Demongeot,et al.  Mathematical modelling in genetic networks: relationships between the genetic expression and both chromosomic breakage and positive circuits , 2000, Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Bio-Informatics and Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  E. Coen,et al.  The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development , 1991, Nature.

[10]  Jacques Demongeot,et al.  Regulatory Networks Analysis: Robustness in Morphogenesis Regulation , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops.

[11]  U. Alon Biological Networks: The Tinkerer as an Engineer , 2003, Science.

[12]  Laurent Trilling,et al.  Connections and Integration with SAT Solvers: A Survey and a Case Study in Computational Biology , 2011 .

[13]  René Thomas On the Relation Between the Logical Structure of Systems and Their Ability to Generate Multiple Steady States or Sustained Oscillations , 1981 .

[14]  Guillermo A. Cecchi,et al.  The Challenges of Systems Biology , 2014 .

[15]  Laurent Trilling,et al.  Applications of a formal approach to decipher discrete genetic networks , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[16]  John J. Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities , 1999 .

[17]  Jacques Demongeot,et al.  Structural Sensitivity of Neural and Genetic Networks , 2008, MICAI.

[18]  J. Demongeot,et al.  Robustness in Regulatory Networks: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach , 2008, Acta biotheoretica.

[19]  S. Kauffman Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[20]  Krzysztof R. Apt,et al.  Principles of constraint programming , 2003 .

[21]  E. Álvarez-Buylla,et al.  Dynamics of the genetic regulatory network for Arabidopsis thaliana flower morphogenesis. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  Clare E. Giacomantonio,et al.  A Boolean Model of the Gene Regulatory Network Underlying Mammalian Cortical Area Development , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[23]  Jacques Demongeot,et al.  Mathematical modeling in genetic networks: relationships between the genetic expression and both chromosomic breakage and positive circuits , 2003, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[24]  J Demongeot,et al.  Mathematical Methods for Inferring Regulatory Networks Interactions: Application to Genetic Regulation , 2004, Acta biotheoretica.

[25]  Maxim Teslenko,et al.  A SAT-Based Algorithm for Finding Attractors in Synchronous Boolean Networks , 2011, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.

[26]  Armin Biere,et al.  Effective Preprocessing in SAT Through Variable and Clause Elimination , 2005, SAT.

[27]  Jacques Demongeot,et al.  Determination, Optimization and Taxonomy of Regulatory Networks: The Example of Arabidopsis thaliana Flower Morphogenesis , 2011, 2011 IEEE Workshops of International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications.

[28]  Laurent Trilling,et al.  A declarative constraint-based method for analyzing discrete genetic regulatory networks , 2009, Biosyst..