Exploring the Nuances of 'Wickedness' in Information Systems Development

Information Systems Development (ISD) practice is an inherently challenging undertaking, as exemplified by the high rate of ISD project failures. The scale of the challenge is often heightened in distributed environments where ISD practitioners can face considerable complexity, uncertainty, and contention. The concept of ‘wickedness’ epitomizes such challenges. However, ISD literature has yet to fully explore the nuances of wickedness found in ISD practices within distributed environments. To address this gap, we use a theoretical framework to analyze case study findings from an interdisciplinary connected health project. In particular, we break open the social aspects of wickedness and explore their impact on shared understanding and shared commitment in ISD projects. The paper highlights the implications that these nuances have for group decision-making in distributed ISD project teams.

[1]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Creating Shared Understanding in Heterogeneous Work Groups: Why It Matters and How to Achieve It , 2014, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Outline of a Theory of Practice , 2020, On Violence.

[3]  Ciara Fitzgerald,et al.  Impacts of Openness on the Success of Information System Development Research Projects , 2017, OpenSym.

[4]  Arun Rai,et al.  Research Commentary - Reframing the Dominant Quests of Information Systems Strategy Research for Complex Adaptive Business Systems , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) , 2018 .

[6]  Ilan Oshri,et al.  Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Jack Shih-Chieh Hsu,et al.  Coping knowledge boundaries between information system and business disciplines: An intellectual capital perspective , 2014, Inf. Manag..

[8]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  A Program for Research on Management Information Systems , 1973 .

[9]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[10]  Jeff Conklin,et al.  Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems , 2005 .

[11]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  Frédéric Adam,et al.  Sociomateriality: an Object-Inspired Proposal for is scholars , 2017, ECIS.

[13]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[14]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Managing Risks in a Failing IT Project: A Social Constructionist View , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Frédéric Adam,et al.  An integrated patient journey mapping tool for embedding quality in healthcare service reform , 2016, J. Decis. Syst..

[16]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Research Note - The Impact of Community Commitment on Participation in Online Communities , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Systems Development in Information Systems Research , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  R. Azarian,et al.  Social Ties , 2010 .

[19]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Social interactions of information systems development teams: a performance perspective , 2010, Inf. Syst. J..

[20]  A. Fenna,et al.  Wicked Problems in Public Policy , 2009 .

[21]  Anil K. Aggarwal,et al.  Decision Making in Diverse Swift Teams: An Exploratory Study , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[22]  Raymond T. Yeh.  System Development as a Wicked Problem , 1991, Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng..

[23]  Ingrid M. Nembhard,et al.  Product Development and Learning in Project Teams: The Challenges Are the Benefits* , 2009 .

[24]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Team Cognition: Development and Evolution in Software Project Teams , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Andy Weeger,et al.  What Teams Need to Be Clear about - an Activity Theoretical Perspective on Shared Understanding in Health IS Implementation , 2017, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[26]  Jochen Runde,et al.  Technological Objects, Social Positions, and the Transformational Model of Social Activity , 2013, MIS Q..

[27]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[28]  Sigal G. Barsade,et al.  Group Affect , 2012 .

[29]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Knowledge Collaboration in Distributed Practice Communities , 2011, ICIS.

[30]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[31]  David Sammon,et al.  Theory-building using Typologies - A Worked Example of Building a Typology of Knowledge Activities for Innovation , 2010, DSS.

[32]  Richard Buchanan,et al.  Wicked Problems in Design Thinking , 1992 .

[33]  L. Henderson.  On the Social System , 1993 .

[34]  Margaret Tan,et al.  Establishing Mutual Understanding in Systems Design: An Empirical Study , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[36]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[37]  Maaike Kleinsmann,et al.  Barriers and enablers for creating shared understanding in co-design projects , 2008 .

[38]  W. Orlikowski.  Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[39]  A. Strauss.  Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[40]  Christoph Rosenkranz,et al.  The Role of Shared Understanding in Distributed Scrum Development: an Empirical Analysis , 2016, ECIS.