Spatial Bias Induced by Simple Addition and Subtraction: From Eye Movement Evidence

The associations between number and space have been intensively investigated. Recent studies indicated that this association could extend to more complex tasks, such as mental arithmetic. However, the mechanism of arithmetic-space associations in mental arithmetic was still a topic of debate. Thus, in the current study, we adopted an eye-tracking technology to investigate whether spatial bias induced by mental arithmetic was related with spatial attention shifts on the mental number line or with semantic link between the operator and space. In Experiment 1, participants moved their eyes to the corresponding response area according to the cues after solving addition and subtraction problems. The results showed that the participants moved their eyes faster to the leftward space after solving subtraction problems and faster to the right after solving addition problems. However, there was no spatial bias observed when the second operand was zero in the same time window, which indicated that the emergence of spatial bias may be associated with spatial attention shifts on the mental number line. In Experiment 2, participants responded to the operator (operation plus and operation minus) with their eyes. The results showed that mere presentation of operator did not cause spatial bias. Therefore, the arithmetic–space associations might be related with the movement along the mental number line.

[1]  Tyler Marghetis,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Doing Arithmetic by Hand: Hand Movements during Exact Arithmetic Reveal Systematic, Dynamic Spatial Processing , 2022 .

[2]  Pierre Noël Barrouillet,et al.  Procedural vs. direct retrieval strategies in arithmetic: A comparison between additive and multiplicative problem solving , 2002 .

[3]  Mauro Pesenti,et al.  Interference of lateralized distractors on arithmetic problem solving: a functional role for attention shifts in mental calculation , 2016, Psychological research.

[4]  David C. Burr,et al.  Underestimation of perceived number at the time of saccades , 2011, Vision Research.

[5]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Spatial Biases in Mental Arithmetic , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  Catherine Thevenot,et al.  Running the number line: Rapid shifts of attention in single-digit arithmetic , 2016, Cognition.

[7]  Tom Verguts,et al.  The Time Course of Spatial Attention Shifts in Elementary Arithmetic , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[8]  J. Ruesink,et al.  Population genetics of the Manila clam (Ruditapes philippinarum) introduced in North America and Europe , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[9]  F. Mast,et al.  Spatial biases during mental arithmetic: evidence from eye movements on a blank screen , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[10]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Can Approximate Mental Calculation Account for Operational Momentum in Addition and Subtraction? , 2022 .

[11]  C. Lappe.  Eye movements: A window on mind and brain , 2008 .

[12]  T. Verguts,et al.  Beyond the mental number line: A neural network model of number–space interactions , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Mental movements without magnitude? A study of spatial biases in symbolic arithmetic , 2008, Cognition.

[14]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[16]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Moving along the Number Line: Operational Momentum in Nonsymbolic Arithmetic , 2006 .

[18]  Steffen Zitzmann,et al.  Examining the Presence and Determinants of Operational Momentum in Childhood , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[19]  Wolf Schwarz,et al.  Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[21]  M. Pesenti,et al.  Time course of overt attentional shifts in mental arithmetic: Evidence from gaze metrics , 2018, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  Spatial Associations in Numerical Cognition—From Single Digits to Arithmetic , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Spatial Interferences in Mental Arithmetic: Evidence from the Motion–Arithmetic Compatibility Effect , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  How to cook a SNARC: Number placement in text rapidly changes spatial–numerical associations , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[25]  Dana Ganor-Stern,et al.  The Representation of Negative Numbers: Exploring the Effects of Mode of Processing and Notation , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  Gilson Luiz Volpato,et al.  Aggressiveness Overcomes Body-Size Effects in Fights Staged between Invasive and Native Fish Species with Overlapping Niches , 2012, PloS one.

[27]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  Heed the Signs: Operation Signs have Spatial Associations , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  J. McGrane.  Stevens’ forgotten crossroads: the divergent measurement traditions in the physical and psychological sciences from the mid-twentieth century , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[29]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Eye Gaze Reveals a Fast, Parallel Extraction of the Syntax of Arithmetic Formulas , 2022 .

[30]  T. Loetscher,et al.  Eye position predicts what number you have in mind , 2010, Current Biology.

[31]  Mauro Pesenti,et al.  Attentional Bias Induced by Solving Simple and Complex Addition and Subtraction Problems , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  M. Ashcraft.  Cognitive arithmetic: A review of data and theory , 1992, Cognition.

[33]  M. Alibali,et al.  Spatial Factors Influence Arithmetic Performance: The Case of the Minus Sign , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  Toshiaki Imada,et al.  Theta brain rhythms index perceptual narrowing in infant speech perception , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[35]  Wim Fias,et al.  The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized , 2003, Cognition.

[36]  V. Michel,et al.  Recruitment of an Area Involved in Eye Movements During Mental Arithmetic , 2009, Science.

[37]  Valérie Dormal,et al.  Impact of optokinetic stimulation on mental arithmetic , 2016, Psychological Research.

[38]  Frank Bremmer,et al.  Saccadic Compression of Symbolic Numerical Magnitude , 2012, PloS one.

[39]  Pierre Barrouillet,et al.  On the problem-size effect in small additions: Can we really discard any counting-based account? , 2013, Cognition.

[40]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Temporal order judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention , 2007, Cognition.

[41]  Catherine Thevenot,et al.  The use of procedural knowledge in simple addition and subtraction problems , 2012, Cognition.

[42]  R. Nicoletti,et al.  Counting Is Easier while Experiencing a Congruent Motion , 2013, PloS one.

[43]  Steve Majerus,et al.  Spatial Attention Interacts With Serial-Order Retrieval From Verbal Working Memory , 2013, Psychological science.

[44]  K Moeller,et al.  Operational Momentum Affects Eye Fixation Behaviour , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[45]  Michael Andres,et al.  Causal role of spatial attention in arithmetic problem solving: Evidence from left unilateral neglect , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  F. Mast,et al.  Moving along the mental number line: Interactions between whole-body motion and numerical cognition. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.