Ultrasound analysis of diaphragm kinetics and the diagnosis of airway obstruction: the role of the M-mode index of obstruction.

Diaphragm motion in forced expiration can be analyzed using M-mode ultrasound in an anterior subcostal approach. Maximum expiratory diaphragmatic excursion (EDEMax) and forced expiratory diaphragmatic excursion in the first second (FEDE1) are considered the physiopathological analogues of vital capacity (VC) and forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1). As the FEV1/VC % ratio is used as a marker of obstruction, our aim was to determine if the ratio FEDE1/EDEMax (M-mode index of obstruction [MIO]) differs between healthy subjects and patients with airway obstruction. One hundred twenty-four outpatients were examined by diaphragm ultrasound after spirometry. The MIO, expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (range), was 87.08 ± 6.64 (72.84-100) in the healthy group (N = 61) and 67.09 ± 12.49 (33.33-91.30) in the group with obstructed airways (N = 63). The difference between the two groups was significant (p < 0.0001), and MIO was significantly correlated with FEV1/VC (p < 0.0001). A MIO <77 was identified as a possibile cutoff for suspecting an obstructive spirometric pattern with a 95.5% positive predictive value. The MIO can be interpreted as a speed index of diaphragmatic relaxation that seems to be slower in obstructed patients and could be used to screen for obstructed airway diseases.

[1]  J E Cotes,et al.  Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows , 1993, European Respiratory Journal.

[2]  J. Prioux,et al.  Diaphragm Movement Before and After Cholecystectomy: A Sonographic Study , 2001, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[3]  J. M. Salge,et al.  Air trapping: The major factor limiting diaphragm mobility in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients , 2008, Respirology.

[4]  A. Daneman,et al.  M-mode sonography of diaphragmatic motion: description of technique and experience in 278 pediatric patients , 2005, Pediatric Radiology.

[5]  C. Prefaut,et al.  [Diaphragm kinetics coupled with spirometry. M-mode ultrasonographic and fluoroscopic study; preliminary results]. , 1997, Journal de radiologie.

[6]  R. S. Harris,et al.  Normal ventilatory movement of the right hemidiaphragm studied by ultrasonography and pneumotachography. , 1983, Radiology.

[7]  C. Prefaut,et al.  Non-invasive quantification of diaphragm kinetics using m-mode sonography , 1997, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[8]  K. Murphy,et al.  Diaphragmatic movement in hemiplegic patients measured by ultrasonography. , 1994, Thorax.

[9]  C. Préfaut,et al.  Cinétique diaphragmatique droite mesurée par ultrasonographie en mode TM avec spirométrie concomitante chez le sujet normal et asthmatique. Résultats préliminaires , 1995 .

[10]  R. Pardy,et al.  Diaphragmatic weakness and paralysis , 2007, Lung.

[11]  J. McGahan,et al.  Ultrasonographic evaluation of diaphragmatic motion. , 2001, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[12]  A. Boussuges,et al.  Diaphragmatic motion studied by m-mode ultrasonography: methods, reproducibility, and normal values. , 2009, Chest.

[13]  J. Houston,et al.  Comparison of ultrasound with fluoroscopy in the assessment of suspected hemidiaphragmatic movement abnormality. , 1995, Clinical radiology.

[14]  C. Prefaut,et al.  [Right diaphragmatic kinetics measured by TM-mode ultrasonography with concomitant spirometry in normal subjects and asthmatic patients. Preliminary results]. , 1995, La Revue de medecine interne.

[15]  J. Hankinson,et al.  Interpretative strategies for lung function tests , 2005, European Respiratory Journal.

[16]  Gino Soldati,et al.  Ultrasound M-mode assessment of diaphragmatic kinetics by anterior transverse scanning in healthy subjects. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  Roger Carter,et al.  Diaphragm Ultrasonography as an Alternative to Whole‐Body Plethysmography in Pulmonary Function Testing , 2006, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[18]  Saoussen Dimassi,et al.  Sonographic evaluation of the diaphragm in critically ill patients. Technique and clinical applications , 2013, Intensive Care Medicine.

[19]  J. Hankinson,et al.  Standardisation of spirometry , 2005, European Respiratory Journal.

[20]  Fatih Aydogan,et al.  Normal Diaphragmatic Motion and the Effects of Body Composition , 2004, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[21]  A. Morris,et al.  Technical report: quantitative assessment of diaphragmatic movement--a reproducible method using ultrasound. , 1992, Clinical radiology.

[22]  A. De Troyer,et al.  Determinants of diaphragm motion in unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[23]  J E Cotes,et al.  Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal. Official Statement of the European Respiratory Society. , 1993, The European respiratory journal. Supplement.

[24]  G. Engström,et al.  Fixed ratio or lower limit of normal as cut-off value for FEV1/VC: an outcome study. , 2013, Respiratory medicine.

[25]  R M Angus,et al.  Ultrasound assessment of normal hemidiaphragmatic movement: relation to inspiratory volume. , 1994, Thorax.

[26]  T. Lloyd,et al.  Diaphragmatic paralysis: the use of M mode ultrasound for diagnosis in adults , 2006, Spinal Cord.

[27]  K. Murphy,et al.  Excursion-volume relation of the right hemidiaphragm measured by ultrasonography and respiratory airflow measurements. , 1994, Thorax.

[28]  K. Labib,et al.  Diaphragmatic paralysis evaluated by phrenic nerve stimulation during fluoroscopy or real-time ultrasound. , 1984, Radiology.