A new type of integral bridge comprising geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls

ABSTRACT: Integral bridges, comprising a continuous bridge girder (i.e. deck) integrated to a pair of abutments without using hinged and movable shoes (i.e. bearings), have been constructed to alleviate several inherent drawbacks of conventional bridges. It is shown that this conventional type of integral bridge still has the following problems: (1) large residual settlements in the backfill, developing a bump immediately behind the abutments, and the development of high residual earth pressure on the back of the abutments by seasonal thermal expansion and contraction of the girder, as well as by traffic loads on the backfill; and (2) large detrimental deformation of the backfill by seismic loads. To alleviate these problems, it is proposed to reinforce the backfill with geosynthetic reinforcement that is firmly connected to the full-height rigid facings (i.e. abutments). A newly proposed integral bridge, called the GRS integral bridge, is constructed in stages: first, geosynthetic-reinforced backfill; se...

[1]  Taro Uchimura,et al.  Performance of a Preloaded-Prestressed Geogrid-Reinforced Soil Pier for a Railway Bridge , 2003 .

[2]  Fumio Tatsuoka,et al.  Modeling the Stress-Strain Relations of Sand in Cyclic Plane , 2003 .

[3]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  Facing contribution to seismic response of reduced-scale reinforced soil walls , 2005 .

[4]  Naser Abu-Hejleh,et al.  Monitored Displacements of Unique Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Bridge Abutments , 2002 .

[5]  Taro Uchimura,et al.  Residual Earth Pressure on a Retaining Wall with Sand Backfill Subjected to Forced Cyclic Lateral Displacements , 2007 .

[6]  Taro Uchimura,et al.  Vertical and horizontal loading tests on full-scale preloaded and prestressed geogrid-reinforced soil structures , 2005 .

[7]  Fumio Tatsuoka,et al.  Evaluation of dynamic failure modes of various bridge types by shaking table tests , 2006 .

[8]  Masahiro Shinoda,et al.  Improving the dynamic performance of preloaded and prestressed mechanically reinforced backfill by using a ratchet connection , 2003 .

[9]  Taro Uchimura,et al.  Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls as Important Permanent Structures 1996 - 1997 Mercer Lecture , 1997 .

[10]  Ching-Chuan Huang,et al.  Simplified approach for assessing seismic displacements of soil-retaining walls. Part II: Geosynthetic-reinforced walls with rigid panel facing , 2007 .

[11]  Fumio Tatsuoka,et al.  Chapter 29 Bridge abutment made of cement-mixed gravel back-fill , 2005 .

[12]  F Tatsuoka,et al.  CEMENT-MIXED SOIL FOR TRANS-TOKYO BAY HIGHWAY AND RAILWAY BRIDGE ABUTMENTS , 2004 .

[13]  Kenichi Matsushima,et al.  Remedial treatment of soil structures using geosynthetic-reinforcing technology , 2007 .

[14]  Kazem Fakharian,et al.  Static and seismic numerical modeling of geosynthetic-reinforced soil segmental bridge abutments , 2007 .

[15]  Charles Wang Wai Ng,et al.  SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION OF SPREAD-BASE INTEGRAL BRIDGE ABUTMENTS , 1998 .

[16]  Taro Uchimura,et al.  Increasing the Stiffness of Mechanically Reinforced Backfill by Preloading and Prestressing , 2003 .