NavWell: A simplified virtual-reality platform for spatial navigation and memory experiments

Being able to navigate, recall important locations, and find the way home are critical skills, essential for survival for both humans and animals. These skills can be examined in the laboratory using the Morris water maze, often considered the gold standard test of animal navigation. In this task, animals are required to locate and recall the location of an escape platform hidden in a pool filled with water. Because animals can not see the platform directly, they must use various landmarks in the environment to escape. With recent advances in technology and virtual reality (VR), many tasks originally used in the animal literature can now be translated for human studies. The virtual water maze task is no exception. However, a number of issues are associated with these mazes, including cost, lack of flexibility, and lack of standardization in terms of experimental designs and procedures. Here we present a virtual water maze system (NavWell) that is readily downloadable and free to use. The system allows for the easy design of experiments and the testing of participants on a desktop computer or fully immersive VR environment. The data from four independent experiments are presented in order to validate the software. From these experiments, a set of procedures for use with a number of well-known memory tests is suggested. This potentially can help with the standardization of navigational research and with navigational testing in the clinic or in an educational environment. Finally, we discuss the limitations of the software and plans for its development and future use.

[1]  Arne D. Ekstrom,et al.  Impairments in precision, rather than spatial strategy, characterize performance on the virtual Morris Water Maze: A case study , 2016, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  N. Foreman,et al.  Ageing and spatial reversal learning in humans: Findings from a virtual water maze , 2014, Behavioural Brain Research.

[3]  Felipe Alves Gomes de Oliveira,et al.  Spatial Navigation in the Elderly with Alzheimer's Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study. , 2018, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[4]  Isabelle Hupont,et al.  How do new visual immersive systems influence gaming QoE? A use case of serious gaming with Oculus Rift , 2015, 2015 Seventh International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[5]  Sasan Mosadeghi,et al.  Feasibility of an Immersive Virtual Reality Intervention for Hospitalized Patients: An Observational Cohort Study , 2016, JMIR mental health.

[6]  Jakub Hort,et al.  Spatial navigation deficits — overlooked cognitive marker for preclinical Alzheimer disease? , 2018, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[7]  E. Strauss,et al.  The Relationship between Everyday Problem Solving and Inconsistency in Reaction Time in Older Adults , 2009, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.

[8]  S. Resnick,et al.  Effects of age on virtual environment place navigation and allocentric cognitive mapping. , 2002, Behavioral neuroscience.

[9]  Spatial learning deficits in Parkinson's disease with and without mild cognitive impairment. , 2017, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[10]  E. Spelke,et al.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation , 1996, Cognition.

[11]  Thomas A. Stoffregen,et al.  The virtual reality head-mounted display Oculus Rift induces motion sickness and is sexist in its effects , 2017, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  K. Cheng A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[13]  T. Wolbers,et al.  How age-related strategy switching deficits affect wayfinding in complex environments , 2014, Neurobiology of Aging.

[14]  C. Barnes,et al.  The Aging Navigational System , 2017, Neuron.

[15]  Roddy M. Grieves,et al.  The representation of space in the brain , 2017, Behavioural Processes.

[16]  Nora S Newcombe,et al.  Why size counts: children's spatial reorientation in large and small enclosures. , 2008, Developmental science.

[17]  Sarah Craig,et al.  Plastic and metaplastic changes in the CA1 and subicular projections to the entorhinal cortex , 2007, Brain Research.

[18]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .

[19]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Anomalous neural circuit function in schizophrenia during a virtual Morris water task , 2010, NeuroImage.

[20]  T. Bliss,et al.  Long‐lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  L. Nerad,et al.  Human spatial navigation deficits after traumatic brain injury shown in the arena maze, a virtual Morris water maze , 2006, Brain injury.

[22]  Aneeka M Hancock,et al.  Persistent increases in the pool of doublecortin-expressing neurons in the hippocampus following spatial navigation training , 2008, Behavioural Brain Research.

[23]  Geoffrey A Kerchner,et al.  Cross-species translation of the Morris maze for Alzheimer's disease. , 2016, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[24]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Lost in virtual space: studies in human and ideal spatial navigation. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  M. Wilson,et al.  NMDA receptors, place cells and hippocampal spatial memory , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  Lesley K. Fellows,et al.  Are core component processes of executive function dissociable within the frontal lobes? Evidence from humans with focal prefrontal damage , 2013, Cortex.

[27]  Bonnie J. Nagel,et al.  Aerobic fitness relates to learning on a virtual Morris Water Task and hippocampal volume in adolescents , 2012, Behavioural Brain Research.

[28]  M. Bravo,et al.  Single-destination navigation in a multiple-destination environment: a new “later-destination attractor” bias in route choice , 2015, Memory & cognition.

[29]  Daniel N. Barry,et al.  The time course of systems consolidation of spatial memory from recent to remote retention: A comparison of the Immediate Early Genes Zif268, c-Fos and Arc , 2016, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[30]  K. Anstey,et al.  Intraindividual variability is a fundamental phenomenon of aging: evidence from an 8-year longitudinal study across young, middle, and older adulthood. , 2014, Developmental psychology.

[31]  N. Takahashi,et al.  Pure topographic disorientation due to right retrosplenial lesion , 1997, Neurology.

[32]  Ronald W. Skelton,et al.  Virtual environment navigation tasks and the assessment of cognitive deficits in individuals with brain injury , 2007, Behavioural Brain Research.

[33]  M. Spetch,et al.  Geometric orientation by humans: angles weigh in , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  J. Pearce,et al.  The 36th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: An associative analysis of spatial learning , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al.  Sex differences in virtual navigation influenced by scale and navigation experience , 2016, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[36]  T. Rodrigo,et al.  Navigational strategies and models , 2002 .

[37]  J. Pearce,et al.  Failure of a landmark to restrict spatial learning based on the shape of the environment , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[38]  S. Commins,et al.  Differences in cue-dependent spatial navigation may be revealed by in-depth swimming analysis , 2009, Behavioural Processes.

[39]  Joseph M. Austen,et al.  Transfer of spatial search between environments in human adults and young children (Homo sapiens): implications for representation of local geometry by spatial systems. , 2014, Developmental psychobiology.

[40]  S. Resnick,et al.  Age differences in the neural systems supporting human allocentric spatial navigation , 2006, Neurobiology of Aging.

[41]  Robert S. Astur,et al.  Spatial memory deficits in a virtual reality eight-arm radial maze in schizophrenia , 2012, Schizophrenia Research.

[42]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.

[43]  Matthew R. Patterson,et al.  Dual-task and electrophysiological markers of executive cognitive processing in older adult gait and fall-risk , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[44]  Michiel H G Claessen,et al.  A Direct Comparison of Real-World and Virtual Navigation Performance in Chronic Stroke Patients , 2016, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[45]  Thomas Brandt,et al.  Spatial Memory Deficits in Patients with Chronic Bilateral Vestibular Failure , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Adam N Mamelak,et al.  Humans with hippocampus damage display severe spatial memory impairments in a virtual Morris water task , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[47]  E. Maguire,et al.  The Well-Worn Route and the Path Less Traveled Distinct Neural Bases of Route Following and Wayfinding in Humans , 2003, Neuron.

[48]  Jakub Hort,et al.  Spatial navigation impairment is proportional to right hippocampal volume , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Dirk Fey,et al.  Understanding the role of distance, direction and cue salience in an associative model of landmark learning , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[50]  S. Commins,et al.  Learning efficiency: The influence of cue salience during spatial navigation , 2015, Behavioural Processes.

[51]  A. Rey L'examen psychologique dans les cas d'encéphalopathie traumatique. (Les problems.). , 1941 .

[52]  L. Nadel,et al.  Précis of O'Keefe & Nadel's The hippocampus as a cognitive map , 1979, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[53]  D. Head,et al.  Age effects on wayfinding and route learning skills , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[54]  Samuel S. Silva,et al.  Head-mounted display versus desktop for 3D navigation in virtual reality: a user study , 2008, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[55]  R. Skelton,et al.  Spatial deficits in a virtual water maze in amnesic participants with hippocampal damage , 2009, Hippocampus.

[56]  Jimmy Y. Zhong,et al.  The Application of a Rodent-Based Morris Water Maze (MWM) Protocol to an Investigation of Age-Related Differences in Human Spatial Learning , 2017, Behavioral neuroscience.

[57]  G. Dawson,et al.  Age-related neural activity during allocentric spatial memory , 2009, Memory.

[58]  R. Holtzer,et al.  Intraindividual variability in verbal fluency performance is moderated by and predictive of mild cognitive impairments. , 2019, Neuropsychology.

[59]  S. Commins,et al.  Differential expression of immediate early genes Zif268 and c-Fos in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex following spatial learning and glutamate receptor antagonism , 2016, Behavioural Brain Research.

[60]  E. Redhead,et al.  Evidence of blocking with geometric cues in a virtual watermaze , 2009 .

[61]  Tamas Makany,et al.  Spatial orientation strategies in Morris-type virtual water task for humans , 2005, Behavioural Brain Research.

[62]  S. Moffat,et al.  Effects of age on navigation strategy , 2012, Neurobiology of Aging.

[63]  S. McKenzie,et al.  Virtual navigation strategies from childhood to senescence: evidence for changes across the life span , 2012, Front. Ag. Neurosci..

[64]  R. Morris Spatial Localization Does Not Require the Presence of Local Cues , 1981 .

[65]  R. Astur,et al.  Sex differences and correlations in a virtual Morris water task, a virtual radial arm maze, and mental rotation , 2004, Behavioural Brain Research.

[66]  Robert S. Astur,et al.  Sex differences in visual-spatial learning using a virtual water maze in pre-pubertal children , 2007, Behavioural Brain Research.

[67]  R. Reitan Validity of the Trail Making Test as an Indicator of Organic Brain Damage , 1958 .

[68]  Victoria D. Chamizo,et al.  Effects of Absolute Proximity Between Landmark and Platform in a Virtual Morris Pool Task with Humans , 2005 .

[69]  J. Aggleton,et al.  Mapping immediate‐early gene activity in the rat after place learning in a water‐maze: the importance of matched control conditions , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[70]  Petra Jansen-Osmann,et al.  Wayfinding behavior and spatial knowledge of adults and children in a virtual environment: The role of landmarks. , 2006, Experimental psychology.

[71]  V. D. Chamizo,et al.  Effect of Absolute Spatial Proximity between a Landmark and a Goal. , 2004 .

[72]  Robert G. Radwin,et al.  Assessing exertions: How an increased level of immersion unwittingly leads to more natural behavior , 2014, 2014 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[73]  S. Commins,et al.  The effects of overtraining in the Morris water maze on allocentric and egocentric learning strategies in rats , 2008, Behavioural Brain Research.

[74]  S. Askari,et al.  Differential diagnosis of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder from normal subjects using virtual reality , 2019, Psychiatry Research.

[75]  Peter M. Jones,et al.  Transfer of spatial behavior between different environments: implications for theories of spatial learning and for the role of the hippocampus in spatial learning. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[76]  S. Commins,et al.  Hippocampal contribution to vector model hypothesis during cue-dependent navigation. , 2013, Learning & memory.

[77]  R. Morris,et al.  Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions , 1982, Nature.

[78]  R. Sutherland,et al.  Human place learning in a virtual Morris water task: some important constraints on the flexibility of place navigation , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[79]  L. Giménez-Llort,et al.  Persistent hyperactivity and distinctive strategy features in the Morris water maze in 3xTg-AD mice at advanced stages of disease. , 2015, Behavioral neuroscience.