Operator volume and outcome of patients undergoing coronary stent placement.

[1]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  Progress in quantitative coronary arteriography , 2012, Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[2]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing risk-adjustment methods for provider profiling. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[3]  E. Topol.  Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine , 1997 .

[4]  L. Klein,et al.  Does low individual operator coronary interventional procedural volume correlate with worse institutional procedural outcome? , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  S. Kimmel,et al.  Operator volume as a "risk factor". , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  William Wijns,et al.  Recommendations on stent manufacture, implantation and utilization , 1997 .

[7]  E. DeLong,et al.  Relationship between physician and hospital coronary angioplasty volume and outcome in elderly patients. , 1997, Circulation.

[8]  S. Ellis,et al.  Relation of operator volume and experience to procedural outcome of percutaneous coronary revascularization at hospitals with high interventional volumes. , 1997, Circulation.

[9]  Teirstein Ps.  Credentialing for coronary interventions. Practice makes perfect. , 1997 .

[10]  L Chiariello,et al.  A comparison of coronary-artery stenting with angioplasty for isolated stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  E L Hannan,et al.  Coronary angioplasty volume-outcome relationships for hospitals and cardiologists. , 1997, JAMA.

[12]  A. Kastrati,et al.  Comparative in‐vitro validation of eight first- and second‐generation quantitative coronary angiography systems , 1997, Coronary artery disease.

[13]  H. Krumholz.  Interventional Cardiology in Europe. , 1996 .

[14]  M. Webb-Peploe,et al.  Planning for coronary angioplasty: guidelines for training and continuing competence. , 1996, Heart.

[15]  D. Malenka.  Indications, practice, and procedural outcomes of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in northern New England in the early 1990s. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  H. Gray,et al.  Planning for coronary angioplasty: guidelines for training and continuing competence. British Cardiac Society (BCS) and British Cardiovascular Intervention Society (BCIS) working group on interventional cardiology. , 1996, Heart.

[17]  R. Matthews,et al.  Comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty outcome and hospital costs for low-volume and high-volume operators. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  R. Califf,et al.  Operator-specific outcomes. A call to professional responsibility. , 1996, Circulation.

[19]  W Rutsch,et al.  Heparin-coated Palmaz-Schatz stents in human coronary arteries. Early outcome of the Benestent-II Pilot Study. , 1996, Circulation.

[20]  S. Ellis,et al.  Subacute stent thrombosis: evolving issues and current concepts. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  E. Topol,et al.  Analysis and comparison of operator-specific outcomes in interventional cardiology. From a multicenter database of 4860 quality-controlled procedures. , 1996, Circulation.

[22]  S. Kimmel,et al.  The relationship between coronary angioplasty procedure volume and major complications. , 1995, JAMA.

[23]  T. Ryan.  The critical question of procedure volume minimums for coronary angioplasty. , 1995, JAMA.

[24]  S. Kimmel,et al.  Development and validation of a simplified predictive index for major complications in contemporary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty practice , 1995 .

[25]  A. Pichard,et al.  Obstacles to outcomes analysis in percutaneous transluminal coronary revascularization. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[26]  E J Topol,et al.  Readiness for the scorecard era in cardiovascular medicine. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[27]  P Hall,et al.  Intracoronary stenting without anticoagulation accomplished with intravascular ultrasound guidance. , 1995, Circulation.

[28]  D. Pryor,et al.  The relation between the volume of coronary angioplasty procedures at hospitals treating Medicare beneficiaries and short-term mortality. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  A. Kastrati,et al.  Four‐Year Experience With Palmaz‐Schatz Stenting in Coronary Angioplasty Complicated by Dissection With Threatened or Present Vessel Closure , 1994, Circulation.

[30]  P. Teirstein,et al.  A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  W Rutsch,et al.  A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  L. Hillis,et al.  Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1994, The American journal of the medical sciences.

[33]  J P Kassirer,et al.  The use and abuse of practice profiles. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  H. Luft,et al.  Coronary Angioplasty Statewide Experience in California , 1993, Circulation.

[35]  J. Chiota.  Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in New York State. , 1993, JAMA.

[36]  E. Topol,et al.  Multicenter investigation of coronary stenting to treat acute or threatened closure after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: clinical and angiographic outcomes. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[37]  E L Hannan,et al.  Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in New York State. Risk factors and outcomes. , 1992, JAMA.

[38]  H. Hecht,et al.  Lesion morphology and coronary angioplasty: current experience and analysis. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[39]  E J Topol,et al.  Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group. , 1990, Circulation.

[40]  T. Ryan,et al.  Clinical competence in percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A statement for physicians from the ACP/ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Privileges in Cardiology. , 1990, Circulation.

[41]  Edward L. Hannan,et al.  Investigation of the Relationship Between Volume and Mortality for Surgical Procedures Performed in New York State Hospitals , 1989 .

[42]  F. Loop,et al.  Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). , 1988, Circulation.

[43]  Harold S. Luft,et al.  Association of volume with outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery —scheduled vs nonscheduled operations , 1987, JAMA.

[44]  J. Douglas,et al.  Percutaneous coronary angioplasty: influence of operator experience on results. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[45]  G. Hartzler.  Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: view of a single relatively high frequency operator. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[46]  S Chierchia,et al.  Recommendations on stent manufacture, implantation and utilization. Study Group of the Working Group on Coronary Circulation. , 1997, European heart journal.

[47]  A. Colombo,et al.  High pressure assisted coronary stent implantation accomplished without intravascular ultrasound guidance and subsequent anticoagulation. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[48]  P. Teirstein.  Credentialing for coronary interventions. Practice makes perfect. , 1997, Circulation.

[49]  Randall C. Thompson,et al.  Changing outcome of angioplasty in the elderly. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[50]  B. Meier,et al.  Interventional cardiology in Europe 1993. Working Group on Coronary Circulation of the European Society of Cardiology. , 1996, European heart journal.

[51]  A. Kastrati,et al.  A RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF ANTIPLATELET THERAPY AFTER THE PLACEMENT OF CORONARY ARTERY STENTS , 1996 .

[52]  R. Califf,et al.  Scorecard Cardiovascular Medicine: Its Impact and Future Directions , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[53]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  Comparison of accuracy and precision of quantitative coronary arterial analysis between cinefilm and digital systems , 1994 .

[54]  T. Ryan,et al.  Clinical competence in percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A statement for physicians from the ACP/ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Privileges in Cardiology. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[55]  J. Detry,et al.  Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty , 1985 .