Characterization of Incident Stroke Signs and Symptoms: Findings From the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study

Background and Purpose— Although patterns of stroke occurrence and mortality have been well studied, few epidemiological data are available regarding the clinical characteristics of stroke events. Methods— We evaluated hospitalized stroke events reported in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study to describe the clinical characteristics of incident stroke. Confirmed stroke cases (n=474) were evaluated for stroke symptoms (headache, vertigo, gait disturbance, convulsions) and stroke signs (hemianopia, diplopia, speech deficits, paresis, paresthesia/sensory deficits) and their univariate associations with race, sex, and stroke subtype. Results— Over 9.2 years of follow-up, 402 (85%) ischemic and 72 (15%) hemorrhagic strokes occurred. Frequency of stroke symptoms (95% CIs) were as follows: headache (27.4%; 23.4% to 31.4%), gait disturbance (10.8%; 7.9% to 13.6%), convulsions (4.4%; 2.6% to 6.3%), and vertigo (2.1%; 0.8% to 3.4%). Speech deficits occurred in 24.0% (20.2% to 27.9%), hemianopia in 14.6% (11.4% to 17.7%), and diplopia in 5.5% (3.4% to 7.5%) of cases. Most cases involved paresis (81.6%; 78.1% to 85.1%), while fewer cases experienced sensory deficits (44.5%; 40.0% to 49.0%). Blacks were more likely than whites to experience paresis (85.4% versus 78.2%;P =0.044). Men were more likely than women to experience a gait disturbance (14.4% versus 6.7%;P =0.007). Persons with hemorrhagic strokes had a higher proportion of headaches (55.6% versus 22.4%;P =0.001) and convulsions (11.1% versus 3.2%;P =0.003) than those with ischemic events, while speech and sensory deficits were more common in ischemic strokes (26.1% versus 12.5%, P =0.013, and 49.0% versus 19.4%, P =0.001, respectively). Conclusions— We present epidemiological data concerning the clinical characteristics of incident stroke in a population-based cohort. Although minor differences by race, sex, and stroke subtype were observed, data from additional follow-up are required to confirm observed variations.

[1]  R. Sacco,et al.  Stroke incidence among white, black, and Hispanic residents of an urban community: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[2]  J. Mullooly,et al.  Stroke in a defined elderly population, 1967-1985. A less lethal and disabling but no less common disease. , 1997, Stroke.

[3]  A. Folsom,et al.  Stroke incidence and survival among middle-aged adults: 9-year follow-up of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) cohort. , 1999, Stroke.

[4]  J. Broderick,et al.  The Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Study: preliminary first-ever and total incidence rates of stroke among blacks. , 1998, Stroke.

[5]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  Secular Trends in Stroke Incidence and Mortality: The Framingham Study , 1992, Stroke.

[6]  J. Tuomilehto,et al.  Stroke incidence and mortality correlated to stroke risk factors in the WHO MONICA Project. An ecological study of 18 populations. , 1997, Stroke.

[7]  C. Anderson,et al.  Trends in the incidence, severity, and short-term outcome of stroke in perth, Western Australia. , 1999, Stroke.

[8]  A. Folsom,et al.  The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: design and objectives. The ARIC investigators. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  B. Stegmayr,et al.  Trends in Incidence, Case‐Fatality Rate, and Severity of Stroke in Northern Sweden, 1985‐1991 , 1994, Stroke.

[10]  P. Duncan,et al.  Inaccuracy of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM) in identifying the diagnosis of ischemic cerebrovascular disease , 1997, Neurology.

[11]  M. Cowan,et al.  American Heart Association. , 2018, P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management.