CT colonography with computer-aided detection: automated recognition of ileocecal valve to reduce number of false-positive detections.

The ileocecal valve (ICV) is a common cause of false-positive detections of polyps at computed tomographic (CT) colonography with computer-aided detection (CAD). The authors developed a CAD algorithm for differentiating the ICV from a true polyp and evaluated this algorithm by using two colonoscopy-confirmed CT colonography data sets. Data sets 1 and 2 consisted of the data obtained at CT colonographic examinations performed in 20 and 40 patients, respectively. Forty of these patients had at least one polyp 1 cm or larger. For data set 1, the proposed ICV recognition algorithm eliminated three of nine (33%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8%, 70%) false-positive CAD detections that were attributable to the ICV and none of the true-positive polyp detections. For data set 2, with use of identical parameters, the algorithm eliminated 11 of 18 (61%; 95% CI: 36%, 83%) false-positive detections that were attributable to the ICV and none of the true-positive detections. The thresholds used to recognize the ICV were a mean internal CT attenuation of less than -124 HU and a volume of greater than 1.5 cm(3). The proposed algorithm successfully recognized the ICV and eliminated it in some cases. This result is clinically important because, by reducing the frequency of a common cause of false-positive detections, this algorithm may improve the efficiency of physicians who use CAD.

[1]  J. Malley,et al.  Colonic polyps: complementary role of computer-aided detection in CT colonography. , 2002, Radiology.

[2]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Automatic segmentation of colonic polyps in CT colonography based on knowledge-guided deformable models , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[3]  R M Summers,et al.  Navigational aids for real-time virtual bronchoscopy. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  R M Summers,et al.  Virtual bronchoscopy: segmentation method for real-time display. , 1996, Radiology.

[5]  K. Kanazawa,et al.  Significance of microsatellite instability in different types of early-stage nonfamilial colorectal carcinomas , 1998, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[6]  Marek Franaszek,et al.  Multiple neural network classification scheme for detection of colonic polyps in CT colonography data sets. , 2003, Academic radiology.

[7]  W. R. Hampton,et al.  Differential diagnosis of fat-containing lesions with abdominal and pelvic CT. , 1993, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[8]  A. M. Youssef,et al.  Automated polyp detection at CT colonography: feasibility assessment in a human population. , 2001, Radiology.

[9]  R. Jeffrey,et al.  Automated polyp detector for CT colonography: feasibility study. , 2000, Radiology.

[10]  R. Ehman,et al.  Reducing data size and radiation dose for CT colonography. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Image gallery: A tool for rapid endobronchial lesion detection and display using virtual bronchoscopy , 1998, Journal of digital imaging.

[12]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Future Directions: Computer-Aided Diagnosis , 2005 .

[13]  S N Thibodeau,et al.  Microsatellite instability in cancer of the proximal colon. , 1993, Science.

[14]  M. Levine,et al.  Ileocecal valve: spectrum of normal findings at double-contrast barium enema examination. , 2003, Radiology.

[15]  R. M. Summers,et al.  Challenges for computer-aided diagnosis for CT colonography , 2002, Abdominal Imaging.