The ontology of biological taxa

Motivation: The classification of biological entities in terms of species and taxa is an important endeavor in biology. Although a large amount of statements encoded in current biomedical ontologies is taxon-dependent there is no obvious or standard way for introducing taxon information into an integrative ontology architecture, supposedly because of ongoing controversies about the ontological nature of species and taxa. Results: In this article, we discuss different approaches on how to represent biological taxa using existing standards for biomedical ontologies such as the description logic OWL DL and the Open Biomedical Ontologies Relation Ontology. We demonstrate how hidden ambiguities of the species concept can be dealt with and existing controversies can be overcome. A novel approach is to envisage taxon information as qualities that inhere in biological organisms, organism parts and populations. Availability: The presented methodology has been implemented in the domain top-level ontology BioTop, openly accessible at http://purl.org/biotop. BioTop may help to improve the logical and ontological rigor of biomedical ontologies and further provides a clear architectural principle to deal with biological taxa information. Contact: stschulz@uni-freiburg.de

[1]  W. Quine,et al.  On What There Will Be , 1948, Realisms Interlinked.

[2]  James M. Okapal The Philosophy of Biology: An Episodic History , 2010 .

[3]  Daniel L. Rubin,et al.  Biomedical ontologies: a functional perspective , 2007, Briefings Bioinform..

[4]  Carola Eschenbach,et al.  Formal Ontology in Information Systems , 2008 .

[5]  M. Ashburner,et al.  The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[6]  Ingvar Johansson,et al.  Continua in Biological Systems , 2007 .

[7]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  The Description Logic Handbook , 2007 .

[8]  Stefan Schulz,et al.  Towards the ontological foundations of symbolic biological theories , 2007, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[9]  Klaus A. Kuhn,et al.  MEDINFO 2007 - Proceedings of the 12th World Congress on Health (Medical) Informatics - Building Sustainable Health Systems, 20-24 August, 2007, Brisbane, Australia , 2007 .

[10]  Elena Beisswanger,et al.  Towards a Top-Domain Ontology for Linking Biomedical Ontologies , 2007, MedInfo.

[11]  Jody Hey,et al.  On the failure of modern species concepts. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  Stefan Schulz,et al.  Biomedical ontologies: What part-of is and isn't , 2006, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[13]  Alan L. Rector,et al.  Granularity, scale and collectivity: When size does and does not matter , 2006, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[14]  Waclaw Kusnierczyk,et al.  Nontological Engineering , 2006, FOIS.

[15]  Elena Beisswanger,et al.  From GENIA to BIOTOP - Towards a Top-Level Ontology for Biology , 2006, FOIS.

[16]  A. Rector,et al.  Relations in biomedical ontologies , 2005, Genome Biology.

[17]  H. Herre,et al.  Ontological Categories in GOL , 2004 .

[18]  Barry Smith,et al.  Individuals, Universals, Collections: On the Foundational Relations of Ontology , 2004 .

[19]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  WonderWeb Deliverable D18 Ontology Library , 2003 .

[20]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications , 2003, Description Logic Handbook.

[21]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Sweetening Ontologies with DOLCE , 2002, EKAW.

[22]  A. Levine The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy.Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology. ByMarc Ereshefsky. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. $64.95. x + 316 p; ill.; index. ISBN: 0–521–78170–1. 2001. , 2002 .

[23]  Jin-Dong Kim,et al.  The GENIA corpus: an annotated research abstract corpus in molecular biology domain , 2002 .

[24]  W. Hennig Phylogenetic Systematics , 2002 .

[25]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management: Ontologies and the Semantic Web , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[26]  Marc Ereshefsky The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy , 2000 .

[27]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[28]  Robert A. Wilson Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays , 1999 .

[29]  H. Dawah,et al.  Species :the units of biodiversity , 1997 .

[30]  N. J. I. Mars Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases , 1995 .

[31]  Nicolaas J. I. Mars,et al.  Towards very large knowledge bases, knowledge building and knowledge sharing 1995 , 1995 .

[32]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Ontologies and Knowledge Bases. Towards a Terminological Clarification , 1995 .

[33]  Charles Darwin,et al.  On the origin of species, 1859 , 1988 .

[34]  D. Hull A Matter of Individuality , 1978, Philosophy of Science.

[35]  M. Ghiselin A Radical Solution to the Species Problem , 1974 .

[36]  Ernst Mayr,et al.  Principles of systematic zoology , 1969 .

[37]  R. B. Freeman,et al.  The works of Charles Darwin , 2010 .

[38]  David L. Hull,et al.  THE EFFECT OF ESSENTIALISM ON TAXONOMY—TWO THOUSAND YEARS OF STASIS (I) * , 1965, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[39]  T. Morrison-Scott,et al.  Principles of Animal Taxonomy , 1962, Nature.

[40]  N. Goodman,et al.  The Structure of Appearance. , 1953 .

[41]  N. Pierce Origin of Species , 1914, Nature.