How to identify metaknowledge trends and features in a certain research field? Evidences from innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystem

Identifying the trends and features of metaknowledge will help scholars track knowledge through topics. This paper designs a new methodology to make it in a certain field. The proposed novel design performs well in the interdisciplinary domain where there are plenty noisy data and conflicting findings. This study applies this research design to a typical interdisciplinary domain, i.e. innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystems. To identify the scope of research and rationalize data collection process, this paper makes a definition of innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystems based on previous researches. Next, we design two data filtering procedures, which can handle the noisy data and provide the datasets for sequence analyses. Then, we adopt the co-citation analysis and network meta-analysis to clarify the trends and features of multiple metaknowledges. Finally, we draw conclusions about emerging trends, mainstream and hotspots, current situation, future challenges or other features of metaknowledge. We also integrate some conflicting findings, which provide more accurate evidences for the field. Evidences show that this novel research design is an effective tool for analyzing metaknowledges and also suitable for other fields.

[1]  Wen-Lung Shiau,et al.  Citation and co-citation analysis to identify core and emerging knowledge in electronic commerce research , 2012, Scientometrics.

[2]  Rahul Kapoor,et al.  Collaborating with Complementors: What Do Firms Do? , 2014 .

[3]  Ian R. White,et al.  Network Meta-analysis , 2015 .

[4]  Donovan Ray Hardenrbook The Wide Lens: A New Strategy for Innovation , 2014 .

[5]  Bart Wiegmans,et al.  Facilitating start-ups in port-city innovation ecosystems: A case study of Montreal and Rotterdam , 2017, Journal of Transport Geography.

[6]  Meen Chul Kim,et al.  Emerging trends and new developments in regenerative medicine: a scientometric update (2000 – 2014) , 2014, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[7]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  The Role of the Business Model in Capturing Value from Innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation's Technology Spin-Off Companies , 2002 .

[8]  David L. Deeds,et al.  The Evolution of Initial Co-investment Syndications in an Emerging Venture Capital Market , 2016 .

[9]  M. Atilla Öner,et al.  A study on Schumpeterian and Kirznerian entrepreneurship in Turkey: 2006–2013 , 2016 .

[10]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[11]  Mary Tripsas UNRAVELING THE PROCESS OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION: COMPLEMENTARY ASSETS AND INCUMBENT SURVIVAL IN THE TYPESETTER INDUSTRY: UNRAVELING THE PROCESS OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION , 1997 .

[12]  C. Jennifer Tae,et al.  Kingpins, Bottlenecks, and Value Dynamics Along a Sector , 2015, Organ. Sci..

[13]  Georgina Guilera Ferré,et al.  Impact and structural features of meta-analytical studies, standard articles and reviews in psychology: Similarities and differences , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[14]  Carmelo Cennamo,et al.  Platform competition: Strategic trade‐offs in platform markets , 2013 .

[15]  Deborah J. Jackson What is an Innovation Ecosystem ? By , 2011 .

[16]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Alternative metrics in scientometrics: a meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics , 2015, Scientometrics.

[17]  Steven Klepper,et al.  The Evolution of New Industries and the Determinants of Market Structure , 1990 .

[18]  P. Rousseeuw Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis , 1987 .

[19]  Kristian Thorlund,et al.  Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis , 2013, BMJ.

[20]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? , 2010 .

[21]  Biao Sun,et al.  The Fit between Technological Innovation and Business Model Design for Firm Growth: Evidence from China , 2014 .

[22]  Jianhua Hou,et al.  The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[24]  James F. Moore The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems , 1996 .

[25]  U. Lichtenthaler RETRACTED: Determinants of proactive and reactive technology licensing: A contingency perspective , 2010 .

[26]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom? An Early Look at Large Numbers of Software 'Apps' Developers and Patterns of Innovation , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[27]  Peng Huang,et al.  Co-Creation of Value in a Platform Ecosystem: The Case of Enterprise Software , 2011, MIS Q..

[28]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Venture Capital as a Catalyst to Commercialization , 2010 .

[29]  B. Carlin,et al.  Case Study Comparing Bayesian and Frequentist Approaches for Multiple Treatment Comparisons , 2013 .

[30]  Gregory L. Richards,et al.  The Information Technology Ecosystem: Structure, Health, and Performance , 2006 .

[31]  Meen Chul Kim,et al.  Orphan drugs and rare diseases: a scientometric review (2000 – 2014) , 2014 .

[32]  Michael Barnett The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability , 2006 .

[33]  Paul Hansen,et al.  Innovation in start-ups: Ideas filling the void or ideas devoid of resources and capabilities? , 2015 .

[34]  Anna Chaimani,et al.  Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis , 2014, PloS one.

[35]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[36]  M. Bengtsson,et al.  Coopetition research in theory and practice : growing new theoretical, empirical, and methodological domains , 2016 .

[37]  A. Gawer,et al.  Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation , 2013 .

[38]  Mark J. Safferstone Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy , 1999 .

[39]  Mu-Hsuan Huang,et al.  A comparative study on detecting research fronts in the organic light-emitting diode (OLED) field using bibliographic coupling and co-citation , 2014, Scientometrics.

[40]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[41]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[42]  A. Gawer,et al.  Platform Owner Entry and Innovation in Complementary Markets: Evidence from Intel , 2005 .

[43]  Kira R. Fabrizio,et al.  Enabling Diffusion: How Complementary Inputs Moderate the Response to Environmental Policy , 2013 .

[44]  Keyvan Vakili,et al.  Collaborative Promotion of Technology Standards and the Impact on Innovation, Industry Structure, and Organizational Capabilities: Evidence from Modern Patent Pools , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[45]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[46]  Elizabeth A. Mack,et al.  The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems , 2016 .

[47]  Ron Adner,et al.  Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re‐examining technology S‐curves , 2016 .

[48]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[49]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .

[50]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Access vs. Devolving Control , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[51]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  A Review and Evaluation of Meta-Analysis Practices in Management Research , 2009 .

[52]  E. Stam Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique , 2015 .

[53]  Paul H. Zipkin,et al.  Competitive and Cooperative Inventory Policies in a Two-Stage Supply Chain , 1999 .

[54]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[55]  Nathan R. Furr,et al.  Complementarities and competition: Unpacking the drivers of entrants' technology choices in the solar photovoltaic industry , 2015 .

[56]  Jin-Su Kang,et al.  Keystone effect on entry into two-sided markets: An analysis of the market entry of WiMAX , 2015 .

[57]  Lamar Pierce Big Losses in Ecosystem Niches: How Core Firm Decisions Drive Complementary Product Shakeouts , 2009 .

[58]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[59]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[60]  S. Nambisan,et al.  Entrepreneurship in Innovation Ecosystems: Entrepreneurs’ Self–Regulatory Processes and Their Implications for New Venture Success , 2013 .

[61]  M. Peltoniemi Preliminary theoretical framework for the study of business ecosystems , 2006 .

[62]  A. Gawer,et al.  How Companies Become Platform Leaders , 2008 .

[63]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[64]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[65]  Reid McIlroy-Young,et al.  Introducing metaknowledge: Software for computational research in information science, network analysis, and science of science , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[66]  Glenda Crosling,et al.  A creative learning ecosystem, quality of education and innovative capacity: a perspective from higher education , 2015 .

[67]  Aidan Kelly,et al.  The Association of Business Schools: Academic journal quality guide, version 3 , 2009 .

[68]  Shlomo Maital,et al.  The Evolution of Innovation Networks and Spin-off Entrepreneurship: The Case of RAD , 2015 .

[69]  Georgina Guilera Ferré,et al.  Meta-analysis in psychology: a bibliometric study , 2012, Scientometrics.

[70]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: a scientometric analysis in CiteSpace , 2012, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[71]  F. Phillips,et al.  Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination , 2016 .

[72]  Mike Wright,et al.  Creating value in ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems , 2014 .

[73]  Mooweon Rhee,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation , 2016 .

[74]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[75]  D. Teece,et al.  How to Capture Value from Innovation: Shaping Intellectual Property and Industry Architecture , 2007 .

[76]  J. F. Moore,et al.  Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[77]  Denis A. Grégoire,et al.  Is There Conceptual Convergence in Entrepreneurship Research? A Co–Citation Analysis of Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1981–2004 , 2006 .

[78]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[79]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[80]  H. Demsetz,et al.  Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization , 1975, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[81]  M. Wright,et al.  Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context , 2014 .

[82]  Heidi M. Neck,et al.  An Entrepreneurial System View of New Venture Creation , 2004 .

[83]  D. Teece,et al.  The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction , 1994 .

[84]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions , 1997 .

[85]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  The proposal of a broadening of perspective in evaluative bibliometrics by complementing the times cited with a cited reference analysis , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[86]  Anna Chaimani,et al.  Visualizing Assumptions and Results in Network Meta-analysis: The Network Graphs Package , 2015 .

[87]  Jacob G. Foster,et al.  Metaknowledge , 2011, Science.

[88]  J. Mathews,et al.  Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians , 2013, BMJ.

[89]  K DwivediYogesh,et al.  Citation and co-citation analysis to identify core and emerging knowledge in electronic commerce research , 2013 .

[90]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[91]  M E J Newman,et al.  Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[92]  Jianhua Hou,et al.  The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis , 2010 .

[93]  O. Persson,et al.  Entrepreneurial Studies: The Dynamic Research Front of a Developing Social Science , 2006 .

[94]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  A scientometric review of emerging trends and new developments in recommendation systems , 2015, Scientometrics.

[95]  S. Park,et al.  When competition eclipses cooperation: an event history analysis of joint venture failure , 1996 .

[96]  Susan E. Woodward,et al.  The Burden of the Nondiversifiable Risk of Entrepreneurship , 2008 .

[97]  Ron Adner Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[98]  Marshall W. Van Alstyne,et al.  Estrategias para mercados bilaterales , 2006 .

[99]  Johan Wiklund,et al.  Individual responses to firm failure : Appraisals, grief, and the influence of prior failure experience , 2014 .

[100]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Who Takes You to the Dance? How Partners’ Institutional Logics Influence Innovation in Young Firms , 2015 .

[101]  Juho Kanniainen,et al.  Investigating adoption of free beta applications in a platform-based business ecosystem , 2014 .

[102]  R. Kapoor,et al.  Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments , 2013 .

[103]  T. Elfring,et al.  Social Capital of Entrepreneurs and Small Firm Performance: A Meta-Analysis of Contextual and Methodological Moderators , 2014 .

[104]  Zhibin Zhang,et al.  Mutualism or cooperation among competitors promotes coexistence and competitive ability , 2003 .

[105]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings , 1991 .

[106]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[107]  Ron Adner,et al.  Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations , 2009 .

[108]  Lukasz Kurgan,et al.  Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery , 2002 .

[109]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Dynamic capabilities : understanding strategic change in organizations , 2007 .

[110]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Bursty and Hierarchical Structure in Streams , 2002, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.