Interval mapping of quantitative trait loci employing correlated trait complexes.

An approach to increase the resolution power of interval mapping of quantitative trait (QT) loci is proposed, based on analysis of correlated trait complexes. For a given set of QTs, the broad sense heritability attributed to a QT locus (QTL) (say, A/a) is an increasing function of the number of traits. Thus, for some traits x and y, H(xy)2(A/a) > or = H(x)2(A/a). The last inequality holds even if y does not depend on A/a at all, but x and y are correlated within the groups AA, Aa and aa due to nongenetic factors and segregation of genes from other chromosomes. A simple relationship connects H2 (both in single trait and two-trait analysis) with the expected LOD value, ELOD = -1/2N log(1-H2). Thus, situations could exist that from the inequality H(xy)2(A/a) > or = H(x)2(A/a) a higher resolution is provided by the two-trait analysis as compared to the single-trait analysis, in spite of the increased number of parameters. Employing LOD-score procedure to simulated backcross data, we showed that the resolution power of the QTL mapping model can be elevated if correlation between QTs is taken into account. The method allows us to test numerous biologically important hypotheses concerning manifold effects of genomic segments on the defined trait complex (means, variances and correlations).

[1]  R. Jansen,et al.  University of Groningen High Resolution of Quantitative Traits Into Multiple Loci via Interval Mapping , 2022 .

[2]  A. Korol,et al.  Recombination Variability and Evolution: Algorithms of estimation and population-genetic models , 1994 .

[3]  J. Josse,et al.  Quantitative trait loci underlying gene product variation: a novel perspective for analyzing regulation of genome expression. , 1994, Genetics.

[4]  Z B Zeng,et al.  Multiple trait analysis of genetic mapping for quantitative trait loci. , 1995, Genetics.

[5]  G. Lathrop,et al.  Detection of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locus by the lod score method: sample size and sampling considerations , 1988, Annals of human genetics.

[6]  C I Amos,et al.  A comparison of univariate and multivariate tests for genetic linkage , 1993, Genetic epidemiology.

[7]  M. Boehnke,et al.  Identifying pedigrees segregating at a major locus for a quantitative trait: an efficient strategy for linkage analysis. , 1989, American journal of human genetics.

[8]  R. Sokal STATISTICAL METHODS IN SYSTEMATICS* , 1965, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[9]  E. Lander,et al.  Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. , 1989, Genetics.

[10]  Chris Haley,et al.  Aspects of maximum likelihood methods for the mapping of quantitative trait loci in line crosses , 1992 .

[11]  G. Carey,et al.  Linkage analysis of quantitative traits: increased power by using selected samples. , 1991, American journal of human genetics.

[12]  J. Doebley,et al.  Inheritance of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte: comparison of results for two F2 populations. , 1993, Genetics.

[13]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Statistical Techniques in Simulation , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[14]  M. Soller,et al.  Detecting marker-QTL linkage and estimating QTL gene effect and map location using a saturated genetic map. , 1993, Genetics.

[15]  M. Soller,et al.  The Efficiency of Experimental Designs for the Detection of Linkage between a Marker Locus and a Locus Affecting a Quantitative Trait in Segregating Populations , 1978 .

[16]  S. Tanksley,et al.  QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross. , 1993, Genetics.

[17]  R. Lande,et al.  Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. , 1990, Genetics.