Current Density Distribution in Electrochemical Cells with Small Cell Heights and Coplanar Thin Electrodes as Used in ec-S/TEM Cell Geometries

The electrochemical engineering aspects of high aspect ratio cells, such as those used in in situ electrochemical scanning transmission microscopy (ec-S/TEM) were examined, focusing on aspects that could cause non-uniform current distribution. Having a uniform current distribution across the working electrode is important for any spectroelectrochemical technique in order to provide accurate electrochemical information as well as structural electrolyte-electrode interface information. An analytical model was developed to determine current density distribution and a Wagner number was derived for a small cell height with coplanar electrodes. The main assumptions of this analysis are: 1) mass transport effects are negligible, 2) a uniform potential distribution in the direction of the cell height due to their small size, and 3) the working electrode potential is constant across its length. With our analysis, the assumptions were found to be reasonable. In addition, the effect of the conductivity and thickness of the thin film electrode and its potential effect on current density distribution have been analyzed. Now, with this work, high aspect ratio cells with a small cell heights and coplanar thin electrodes can be analyzed to determine their current density distribution.

[1]  J. D. Mozo,et al.  Designing spectroelectrochemical cells: A review , 2018 .

[2]  S. Maldonado,et al.  Electrochemical Measurements in In Situ TEM Experiments , 2017 .

[3]  Seiji Takeda,et al.  Current status and future directions for in situ transmission electron microscopy. , 2016, Ultramicroscopy.

[4]  D. Lloyd,et al.  Preparation of a cost-effective, scalable and energy efficient all-copper redox flow battery , 2015 .

[5]  Nina Balke,et al.  Nanoscale imaging of fundamental li battery chemistry: solid-electrolyte interphase formation and preferential growth of lithium metal nanoclusters. , 2015, Nano letters.

[6]  B. L. Mehdi,et al.  Observation and quantification of nanoscale processes in lithium batteries by operando electrochemical (S)TEM. , 2015, Nano letters.

[7]  M. Shaw,et al.  A Sealed Liquid Cell for In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy of Controlled Electrochemical Processes , 2015, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[8]  Chongmin Wang,et al.  Observation of materials processes in liquids by electron microscopy , 2015 .

[9]  Eva Magdalena,et al.  Description and performance of a novel aqueous all-copper redox flow battery , 2014 .

[10]  F. Ross,et al.  Electron–Water Interactions and Implications for Liquid Cell Electron Microscopy , 2014 .

[11]  N. Dudney,et al.  Direct Visualization of Solid Electrolyte Interphase Formation in Lithium-Ion Batteries with In Situ Electrochemical Transmission Electron Microscopy , 2014, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[12]  N. Browning,et al.  Factors influencing quantitative liquid (scanning) transmission electron microscopy. , 2014, Chemical communications.

[13]  James E. Evans,et al.  In-Situ Electrochemical Transmission Electron Microscopy for Battery Research , 2014, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[14]  H. Xin,et al.  Visualization of electrode-electrolyte interfaces in LiPF6/EC/DEC electrolyte for lithium ion batteries via in situ TEM. , 2014, Nano letters.

[15]  Gilbert M. Brown,et al.  Quantitative Electrochemical Measurements Using In Situ ec-S/TEM Devices , 2014, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[16]  M. Sun,et al.  Structural and Morphological Evolution of Lead Dendrites during Electrochemical Migration , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[17]  James E. Evans,et al.  Experimental procedures to mitigate electron beam induced artifacts during in situ fluid imaging of nanomaterials. , 2013, Ultramicroscopy.

[18]  James E. Evans,et al.  Direct in situ determination of the mechanisms controlling nanoparticle nucleation and growth. , 2012, ACS nano.

[19]  Bruce Dunn,et al.  In situ transmission electron microscopy of lead dendrites and lead ions in aqueous solution. , 2012, ACS nano.

[20]  Niels de Jonge,et al.  Electron microscopy of specimens in liquid. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[21]  K. I. Popov,et al.  A mathematical model of the current density distribution in electrochemical cells , 2011 .

[22]  P. Searson,et al.  Evolution of surface width in electrochemical nucleation and growth , 2010 .

[23]  J. Mostany,et al.  Electrochemical nucleation and the classical theory: Overpotential and temperature dependence of the nucleation rate , 2008 .

[24]  F. Ross,et al.  The morphology and nucleation kinetics of copper islands during electrodeposition , 2006 .

[25]  F. Ross,et al.  In situ study of the growth kinetics of individual island electrodeposition of copper. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[26]  Peter C Searson,et al.  Quantifying electrochemical nucleation and growth of nanoscale clusters using real-time kinetic data. , 2006, Nano letters.

[27]  P. Bohn,et al.  Factors influencing the interfacial width of copper gradients on gold produced by spatiotemporal control of the in-plane electrochemical potential distribution: electrode geometry and plating solution composition , 2004 .

[28]  F. Ross,et al.  Dynamic microscopy of nanoscale cluster growth at the solid–liquid interface , 2003, Nature materials.

[29]  R. Compton,et al.  A review of the analysis of multiple nucleation with diffusion controlled growth , 2003 .

[30]  J. A. Crayston.  Spectroelectrochemistry: In situ UV‐visible Spectroscopy , 2003 .

[31]  H. Knözinger,et al.  Time‐resolved in situ Raman spectroscopy of working catalysts: sulfated and tungstated zirconia , 2002 .

[32]  M. Odziemkowski,et al.  An Electrochemical Study of the Reactivity at the Lithium Electrolyte/Bare Lithium Metal Interface , 1992 .

[33]  P. Hansma,et al.  Atomic-Resolution Electrochemistry with the Atomic Force Microscope: Copper Deposition on Gold , 1991, Science.

[34]  J. Pethica,et al.  In situ scanning tunneling microscopy: New insight for electrochemical electrode-surface investigations , 1990 .

[35]  M. Sluyters-Rehbach,et al.  The theory of chronoamperometry for the investigation of electrocrystallization : Mathematical description and analysis in the case of diffusion-controlled growth , 1987 .

[36]  R. Bragg,et al.  The electrical conductivity and Hall effect of glassy carbon , 1983 .

[37]  B. Scharifker,et al.  Theoretical and experimental studies of multiple nucleation , 1983 .

[38]  A. Milchev,et al.  A potentiostatic study of the electrochemical nucleation of silver on vitreous carbon , 1982 .

[39]  A. Milchev,et al.  Electronmicroscope investigations of the initial stages of silver electrodeposition , 1976 .

[40]  H. Thirsk,et al.  The potentiostatic study of the growth of deposits on electrodes , 1959 .

[41]  C. Wagner,et al.  Theoretical Analysis of the Current Density Distribution in Electrolytic Cells , 1951 .

[42]  L. Rosenhead.  Conduction of Heat in Solids , 1947, Nature.