Monitoring Spatially Referenced Entities in Wireless Sensor Networks

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) make it possible to gather information about the physical world in novel ways and in unprecedented levels of detail. In the environmental sciences, in particular, WSNs are on the way to becoming an important tool for monitoring spatially- and temporally-extended physical phenomena. However, support for high-level and expressive spatio-analytic tasks to explore relationships between spatially referenced entities (e.g., whether mist is over a vineyard or has not yet touched it) and to derive representations grounded on such relationships (e.g., the geometrical extent of that part of a vineyard that is covered by mist) is still incipient, particularly in the case of in-network processing approaches that are imperative, due to energy scarcity, in mote-level WSNs. This paper describes distributed implementations of a comprehensive collection of spatio-algebraic operations that enable the expression and evaluation of tasks involving spatial predicates as well as the derivation of new geometries from existing geometries. This makes it possible to report back only fine-grained information.

[1]  Markus Schneider,et al.  Spatial Data Types for Database Systems: Finite Resolution Geometry for Geographic Information Systems , 1997 .

[2]  Michael F. Worboys,et al.  Monitoring qualitative spatiotemporal change for geosensor networks , 2006, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[3]  Philippe Bonnet,et al.  Querying the physical world , 2000, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[4]  Luca Mottola,et al.  Logical Neighborhoods: A Programming Abstraction for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2006, DCOSS.

[5]  Alvaro A. A. Fernandes,et al.  Impact on Accuracy of Deployment Trade-Offs in Localized Sensor Network Event Detection , 2008 .

[6]  Ramesh Govindan,et al.  Localized edge detection in sensor fields , 2003, Ad Hoc Networks.

[7]  Alvaro A. A. Fernandes,et al.  Distributed Spatial Analysis in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE 16th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[8]  Wei Hong,et al.  TinyDB: an acquisitional query processing system for sensor networks , 2005, TODS.

[9]  Matt Welsh,et al.  Simulating the power consumption of large-scale sensor network applications , 2004, SenSys '04.

[10]  Brad Karp,et al.  GPSR : Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing for Wireless , 2000, MobiCom 2000.

[11]  B. R. Badrinath,et al.  STREAM: Sensor Topology Retrieval at Multiple Resolutions , 2004, Telecommun. Syst..

[12]  Matt Welsh Exposing resource tradeoffs in region-based communication abstractions for sensor networks , 2004, CCRV.

[13]  Jie Gao,et al.  Light-Weight Contour Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications.

[14]  Chung-Ta King,et al.  Region abstraction for event tracking in wireless sensor networks , 2005, 8th International Symposium on Parallel Architectures,Algorithms and Networks (ISPAN'05).

[15]  Norman W. Paton,et al.  Tripod: a comprehensive system for the management of spatial and aspatial historical objects , 2001, GIS '01.

[16]  Kirk Martinez,et al.  Environmental Sensor Networks: A revolution in the earth system science? , 2006 .

[17]  H. Coxeter,et al.  Introduction to Geometry , 1964, The Mathematical Gazette.

[18]  Wei Hong,et al.  Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation Tag: a Tiny Aggregation Service for Ad-hoc Sensor Networks , 2022 .

[19]  Christian Y. A. Brenninkmeijer,et al.  Comprehensive Optimization of Declarative Sensor Network Queries , 2009, SSDBM.

[20]  Rajiv Khosla,et al.  The Role of Precision Agriculture in Cropping Systems , 2003 .

[21]  Michael F. Worboys,et al.  Detecting basic topological changes in sensor networks by local aggregation , 2008, GIS '08.

[22]  Markus Schneider,et al.  Spatial Data Types for Database Systems , 1997, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[23]  Michael F. Worboys,et al.  Detecting Topological Change Using a Wireless Sensor Network , 2008, GIScience.