A meta-synthesis on the usability of social media blends in e-learning

Distance education has by nature always depended on technology as a vehicle for various media used to facilitate learning. Today as technology has taken centre stage in our lives especially Internet-based technology, distance education continues to grow in its use of state-ofthe-art tools and hence the need to effectively adopt these online tools for online education remains inevitable. This study presents an evaluation of the usability of social media blends in elearning environments. Comprehensive guidelines for improving the usability of social media blends are proposed in order to facilitate learner networks where knowledge can be created that is based on the leaners’ experiences and their peer connections. In this meta-analysis study literature was searched to identify qualitative research articles that discuss social media blends most commonly used in e-learning. The search was done on South African and international academic databases which included SAe-Publications, EbscoHost, ProQuest and Google Scholar, among others. The metadata analysis was conducted following the online collaborative learning theory as a conceptual framework and the findings agreed with previous studies that the use of social media blends still lacks important empirical data. This study recommends a set of phases in designing curriculum for social media use in e-learning. The proposed guidelines should be useful to instructional designers interested in using modern learning theories in e-learning. Since African qualitative research could not be found, further work in this field could involve qualitative studies on the use of e-learning in African institutions. KEY TERMS: Distance education, open distance learning, social media blends, e-learning, online learning, qualitative research, connectivism, constructivism, meta-synthesis, online collaborative learning

[1]  Lela V. Zimmer,et al.  Qualitative meta-synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts. , 2006, Journal of advanced nursing.

[2]  Marian Petre,et al.  A gentle guide to research methods , 2006 .

[3]  Frank P. Trimble,et al.  From Synthesis to Script: Transforming Qualitative Research Findings for Use in Practice , 2006, Qualitative health research.

[4]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Theories for Learning with Emerging Technologies , 2010 .

[5]  Lori B. Holcomb,et al.  The Use of Alternative Social Networking Sites in Higher Educational Settings: A Case Study of the E-Learning Benefits of Ning in Education , 2010 .

[6]  Baiyun Chen,et al.  Investigating Instructional Strategies for Using Social Media in Formal and Informal Learning. , 2012 .

[7]  E. Lwoga Making Learning and Web 2.0 Technologies Work for Higher Learning Institutions in Africa. , 2012 .

[8]  Tiffany A. Koszalka,et al.  Literature on the safe and disruptive learning potential of mobile technologies , 2010 .

[9]  T. Butler for Interpretive Research in Information Systems , 2016 .

[10]  J. D. Taylora,et al.  Developing a mobile learning solution for health and social care practice , 2010 .

[11]  R. Dellavalle,et al.  The role of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in dermatology. , 2012, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[12]  Liming Zhu,et al.  A framework for classifying and comparing software architecture evaluation methods , 2004, 2004 Australian Software Engineering Conference. Proceedings..

[13]  Debra Marsh,et al.  Using Social Networks for Pedagogical Practice in French Higher Education: Educator and Learner Perspectives , 2015, RUSC, Universities and Knowledge Society Journal.

[14]  George Siemens Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2004 .

[15]  George Siemens,et al.  Handbook of Emerging Technologies for Learning , 2009 .

[16]  Anastasios A. Economides,et al.  Evaluation of Online Educational Software Designed for the Purpose of Teaching Programming , 2001, WebNet.

[17]  Mark A. Neufeld Who's Afraid of Meta-Theory? , 1994 .

[18]  Giovanni Toffetti Carughi,et al.  Web Usability: Principles and Evaluation Methods , 2006, Web Engineering.

[19]  T. Treasure-Jones,et al.  Developing a mobile learning solution for health and social care practice , 2010 .

[20]  Saul Carliner,et al.  The e-learning handbook : past promises, present challenges , 2008 .

[21]  Chris Kenyon,et al.  From andragogy to heutagogy , 2000 .

[22]  J. Creswell Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches , 2006 .

[23]  Y. Ariel,et al.  Information, Interactivity, and Social Media , 2015 .

[24]  G. Antes,et al.  Five Steps to Conducting a Systematic Review , 2003, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[25]  Barbara S. Chaparro,et al.  Usability Evaluation of Three Social Networking Sites , 2009 .

[26]  Randy Garrison,et al.  Implications of Online Learning for the Conceptual Development and Practice of Distance Education. , 2009 .

[27]  Nahid Golafshani,et al.  Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research , 2003 .

[28]  D. R. Garrison,et al.  Three generations of technological innovations in distance education , 1985 .

[29]  L. L Lohr,et al.  Designing the instructional interface , 2000 .

[30]  S. Minocha,et al.  Social, usability and pedagogical factors influencing students' learning experiences with wikis and blogs , 2008 .

[31]  M. Rogers-Estable,et al.  Web 2.0 Use in Higher Education , 2014 .

[32]  Büşra Özmen,et al.  The Effects of Social Networking Sites in Distance Learning on Learners’ Academic Achievements , 2014 .

[33]  T. Anderson,et al.  Three Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy. , 2010 .

[34]  P. Prinsloo,et al.  Revisiting the five generations of distance education : Quo vadis? , 2010 .

[35]  Rita Kop,et al.  Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? , 2008 .

[36]  Mike Moore,et al.  Distance Education: A Systems View , 1995 .

[37]  Soohyung Joo,et al.  A Usability Evaluation Model for Academic Library Websites: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Learnability , 2011 .

[38]  P. Leavy,et al.  The Practice of Qualitative Research , 2005 .

[39]  Jan Bosch,et al.  Architecting for usability: a survey , 2004, J. Syst. Softw..

[40]  Yvonna S. Lincoln,et al.  Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies , 2008 .

[41]  David Feist,et al.  Software Evaluation Criteria and Terminology , 2002 .

[42]  Muhammad Ali Babar,et al.  Comparison of scenario-based software architecture evaluation methods , 2004, 11th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference.

[43]  Colla J. MacDonald,et al.  Learners' Perspectives on what is Missing from Online Learning: Interpretations through the Community of Inquiry Framework , 2006 .

[44]  Maggi Savin-Baden,et al.  An Introduction to Qualitative Research Synthesis: Managing the Information Explosion in Social Science Research , 2010 .

[45]  C. Silver,et al.  Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-by-Step Guide , 2007 .

[46]  Jeasik Cho,et al.  Validity in qualitative research revisited , 2006 .

[47]  Said Hadjerrouit,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Using and Evaluating Web-Based Learning Resources in School Education , 2010, J. Inf. Technol. Educ..

[48]  Dusan Starcevic,et al.  Usability Issues of e-Learning Systems: Case-Study for Moodle Learning Management System , 2008, OTM Workshops.

[49]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Wikis and collaborative learning in higher education , 2015 .

[50]  Andrew Atherton,et al.  Structuring qualitative enquiry in management and organization research:a dialogue on the merits of using software for qualitative data analysis , 2007 .

[51]  Alan W. Brown,et al.  A Framework for Evaluating Software Technology , 1996, IEEE Softw..

[52]  R. Matthews,et al.  Vygotsky's philosophy: Constructivism and its criticisms examined , 2005 .

[53]  S. Downe,et al.  Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. , 2005, Journal of advanced nursing.

[54]  Hoda Mashayekhi,et al.  Towards a General Framework for Evaluating Software Development Methodologies , 2010, 2010 IEEE 34th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference.

[55]  Somaiya Naidu,et al.  E-Learning: A Guidebook of Principles, Procedures and Practices , 2003 .

[56]  John C. Nesbit,et al.  A Framework for Evaluating the Quality of Multimedia Learning Resources , 2007, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[57]  Arlene Fink,et al.  Conducting research literature reviews : from the internet to paper , 2014 .

[58]  Cesar C. Navarrete,et al.  Online social networks as formal learning environments: Learner experiences and activities , 2012 .

[59]  Ansie Minnaar Student support in e-learning courses in higher education – insights from a metasynthesis “A pedagogy of panic attacks” , 2011 .

[60]  Paul D Jeanne Ellis Ormrod Leedy,et al.  Practical Research: Planning and Design , 1974 .

[61]  Hasan Tinmaz,et al.  Social Networking Websites as an Innovative Framework for Connectivism , 2012 .

[62]  Eileen Scanlon,et al.  Contexts for evaluating educational software , 1999, Interact. Comput..

[63]  Badrul H. Khan,et al.  A framework for web-based learning , 2000 .

[64]  Linda M. Harasim,et al.  Learning Theory and Online Technologies , 2011 .

[65]  Asta Bäck,et al.  Social Media Roadmaps: Exploring the futures triggered by social media , 2008 .

[67]  M. R. De Villiers,et al.  Evaluation of a Collaborative Learning Environment on a Facebook Forum , 2013 .

[68]  Tony Cornford,et al.  Project Research in Information Systems , 1996 .

[69]  Gillian H. Roehrig,et al.  Constructing Media Artifacts in a Social Constructivist Environment to Enhance Students’ Environmental Awareness and Activism , 2015 .

[70]  Michael Simonson,et al.  Distance education research: a review of the literature , 2011, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[71]  Veronica Marín-Diaz,et al.  First Steps Towards a University Social Network on Personal Learning Environments. , 2014 .

[72]  Megan Poore,et al.  Using Social Media in the Classroom: A Best Practice Guide , 2012 .

[73]  Shailey Minocha,et al.  The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of using social software in higher and further education teaching and learning , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[74]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics , 1994, CHI '94.

[75]  M. Veeramani E-Learning: A Conceptual Framework , 2010 .

[76]  Swapna Kumar,et al.  More than a social network: Facebook as a catalyst for an online educational community of practice , 2013, Int. J. Soc. Media Interact. Learn. Environ..

[77]  Christian Dalsgaard,et al.  Social software: E-learning beyond learning management systems , 2006 .

[78]  Barbara S. Chaparro,et al.  Trick or Tweet: How Usable is Twitter for First-Time Users? , 2009 .

[79]  Srinivasan Parthasarathy,et al.  Interactive Tweaking of Text Analytics Dashboards , 2015, DNIS.

[80]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[81]  U. Sekaran,et al.  Research Methods for Business : A Skill Building Approach (5th Edition) , 1992 .

[82]  Sally Thorne,et al.  Meta-Study of Qualitative Health Research: A Practical Guide to Meta-Analysis and Meta-Synthesis , 2001 .

[83]  Sally Thorne,et al.  Chronic Illness Experience: Insights from a Metastudy , 2002, Qualitative health research.

[84]  Yeonjeong Park,et al.  A Pedagogical Framework for Mobile Learning: Categorizing Educational Applications of Mobile Technologies into Four Types. , 2011 .