Equilibrium Exchange Rate Hedging

In a one-period model where each investor consumes a single good, and where borrowing and lending are private and real, there is a universal constant that tells how much each investor hedges his foreign investments. The constant depends only on average risk tolerance across investors. The same constant applies to every real foreign investment held by every investor. Foreign investors are those with different consumption goods, not necessarily those who live in different countries. In equilibrium, the price of the world market portfolio will adjust so that the constant will be related to an average of world market risk premia, an average of world market volatilities, and an average of exchange rate volatilities, where we take the averages over all investors. The constant will not be related to exchange rate means or covariances. In the limiting case when exchange risk approaches zero, the constant will be equal to one minus the ratio of the variance of the world market return to its mean. Jensen's inequality, or "Siegel's paradox," makes investors want significant amounts of exchange rate risk in their portfolios. It also makes investors prefer a world with more exchange rate risk to a similar world with less exchange rate risk.

[1]  R. M. Stulz,et al.  A model of international asset pricing , 1981 .

[2]  J. McCulloch,et al.  Operational Aspects of the Siegel Paradox , 1975 .

[3]  J. Frankel Recent Estimates of Time-Variation in the Conditional Variance and in the Exchange Risk Premium , 1987 .

[4]  B. Dumas,et al.  Exposure to Currency Risk: Definition and Measurement , 1984 .

[5]  J. Siegel Risk, Interest Rates and the Forward Exchange , 1972 .

[6]  Bruce G. Resnick,et al.  Exchange Rate Uncertainty, Forward Contracts, and International Portfolio Selection , 1988 .

[7]  R. Litzenberger,et al.  Sharing rules and equilibrium in an international capital market under uncertainty , 1976 .

[8]  Andre F. Perold,et al.  The Free Lunch in Currency Hedging: Implications for Investment Policy and Peformance Standards , 1988 .

[9]  Bruno Solnik,et al.  A pure foreign exchange asset pricing model , 1977 .

[10]  Stephen L Taylor,et al.  Forecasting the volatility of currency exchange rates , 1987 .

[11]  M. Blume,et al.  The Demand for Risky Assets , 1975 .

[12]  R. Mehra,et al.  THE EQUITY PREMIUM A Puzzle , 1985 .

[13]  ThomasLee R.Iii Currency Risks in International Equity Portfolios , 1988 .

[14]  Don E. Roper The Role of Expected Value Analysis for Speculative Decisions in the Forward Currency Market , 1975 .

[15]  Bruno H. Solnik,et al.  An equilibrium model of the international capital market , 1974 .

[16]  J. Frankel The Implications of Mean-Variance Optimization for Four Questions in International Macroeconomics , 1985 .

[17]  David P. Simon,et al.  Exchange risk surprises in international portfolios , 1986 .

[18]  S. Edwards Real Exchange Rate Variability: an Empirical Analysis of the Developing Countries Case , 1986 .

[19]  Bernard Dumas,et al.  International Portfolio Choice and Corporation Finance: A Synthesis , 1983 .

[20]  Fischer Black,et al.  Mean Reversion and Consumption Smoothing , 1989 .

[21]  Douglas T. Breeden An Intertemporal Asset Pricing Model with Stochastic Consumption and Investment Opportunities , 1979 .