Hawks and Doves, Isolationism and Political Distrust: An Analysis of Public Opinion on Military Policy

Recent studies of public opinion on Vietnam reveal a surprising positive association between socioeconomic status (SES) and support for “tougher†military policies. In an effort to extend and understand such findings, this study reanalyzes several public opinion surveys conducted during the Korean War. The demographic correlates of military policy preferences are found to be similar to those reported for the Vietnamese War, but the Korean data qualify the proposition that higher SES is associated with support for “tougher†policies in two respects: (1) policy preferences of the Korean public did not appear to be organized on a simple “soft-to-tough†dimension—those who supported escalation were only slightly more likely than average to oppose disengagement; (2) while SES was positively associated with opposing disengagement, it was not associated with supporting escalation. Factor analyses of several surveys reveal two distinct, orthogonal dimensions that underlay military policy preferences: an “isolationist-to-interventionist†dimension associated with opposition to disengagement; and a “trust-to-distrust of the Truman Administration†dimension associated with support for escalation. Respondents are subdivided into four types in accordance with their positions on these dimensions. The demographic characteristics and military preferences of the four types are analyzed, and the overall findings arc discussed with reference to Vietnam as well as public opinion on military policy more generally.

[1]  Multidimensional differences in public and academic perceptions of nations. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  J. Rotter.  Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[3]  T. A. Sumberg.  La Mandragola: An Interpretation , 1961, Journal of Politics.

[4]  W. Gamson.  Power and discontent , 1968 .

[5]  Johan Galtung,et al.  Foreign Policy Opinion as a Function of Social Position , 1964 .

[6]  D. Easton,et al.  A Systems Analysis of Political Life , 1966 .

[7]  W. Gamson,et al.  KNOWLEDGE AND FOREIGN POLICY OPINIONS: SOME MODELS FOR CONSIDERATION , 1966 .

[8]  Morris Rosenberg,et al.  MISANTHROPY AND POLITICAL IDEOLOGY , 1956 .

[9]  S. Lipset.  Democracy and Working-Class Authoritarianism , 1959 .

[10]  E. Litt.  Political Cynicism and Political Futility , 1963, The Journal of Politics.

[11]  P. Ekman,et al.  Public Opinion and the War in Vietnam , 1967, American Political Science Review.

[12]  J. Sherwood,et al.  Prediciting the conclusions of Negro-white intelligence research from biographical characteristics of the investigator. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  M. J. Rosenberg,et al.  Vietnam and the Silent Majority: The Dove's Guide to Public Opinion , 1970 .

[14]  R. Hamilton,et al.  A research note on the mass support for "tough" military initiatives. , 1968, American sociological review.

[15]  Jack L. Walker,et al.  Political Trust and Racial Ideology , 1970, American Political Science Review.

[16]  H. Kelley.  Attribution theory in social psychology , 1967 .

[17]  M. Wish.  Differences in Conceptual Structures of Nations: An Exploratory Study. , 1970 .

[18]  H. Hahn.  Correlates of Public Sentiments About War: Local Referenda on the Vietnam Issue , 1970, American Political Science Review.

[19]  Howard Schuman,et al.  ``Silent Majorities'' and the Vietnam War , 1970 .

[20]  P. Converse,et al.  Continuity and Change in American Politics: Parties and Issues in the 1968 Election , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[21]  William R. Caspary.  The “Mood Theory”: A Study of Public Opinion and Foreign Policy , 1970, American Political Science Review.