Although there is widespread concern in the United States about the growing technological capacity of India and China, the nation actually has little reliable information about the future engineering workforce in these countries. U.S. political leaders prescribe remedies such as increasing U.S. engineering graduation rates to match the self-proclaimed rates of emerging competitors. Many leaders attribute the increasing momentum in outsourcing by U.S. companies to shortages of skilled workers and to weaknesses in the nation's education systems, without fully understanding why companies outsource. Many people within and beyond government also do not seem to look ahead and realize that what could be outsourced next is research and design, and the United States stands to lose its ability to "invent" the next big technologies. At the Pratt School of Engineering of Duke University, we have been studying the impact of globalization on the engineering profession. Among our efforts, we have sought to assess the comparative engineering education of the United States and its major new competitors, India and China; identify the sources of current U.S. global advantages; explore the factors driving the U.S. trend towards outsourcing; and learn what the United States can do to keep its economic edge. We believe that the data we have obtained, through not exhaustive represent the best information available and can help U.S. policymakers, business leaders, and educators chart future actions.
[1]
James C. I. Dooge,et al.
Linear Theory of Hydrologic Systems
,
1973
.
[2]
G. Kriegsmann.
APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE: DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED
,
2022
.
[3]
Neil van der Gugten.
Hydrology of floods in Canada — a guide to planning and design
,
1992
.
[4]
Ralph A. Palmer.
American society of agricultural engineers
,
1925,
Journal of the A.I.E.E..
[5]
Curtis L. Larson,et al.
Modeling infiltration during a steady rain
,
1973
.
[6]
J. E. Nash,et al.
A note on the Muskingum flood‐routing method
,
1959
.
[7]
C. T. Haan,et al.
Hydrologic modeling of small watersheds
,
1982
.
[8]
Harlan L. McKim,et al.
IV. Water resource modelling using remote sensing and object‐oriented simulation
,
1993
.
[9]
H. Saunders,et al.
Theory And Design Of Pressure Vessels
,
1985
.
[10]
耳野 亨.
ASME boiler and pressure vessel codeの許容応力の改訂
,
1970
.
[11]
Abdul Razak Saleh.
Simulation of Southern Louisiana watershed hydrology with USDAHL-74 revised model of watershed hydrology
,
1987
.
[12]
Suhas R. Ghate,et al.
GAWSER—A Modified HYMO Model Incorporating Areally-Variable Infiltration
,
1982
.
[13]
M. Pursley.
Report Documentation Page Form Approved Omb No. 0704-0188 Please Do Not Return Your Form to the above Address. 1. Report Date (dd-mm-yyyy) Final Technical Report Receiver Statistics for Cognitive Radios in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks Onr
,
2007
.