The Effectiveness of Teleglaucoma versus In-Patient Examination for Glaucoma Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible visual impairment in the world affecting 60.5 million people worldwide in 2010, which is expected to increase to approximately 79.6 million by 2020. Therefore, glaucoma screening is important to detect, diagnose, and treat patients at the earlier stages to prevent disease progression and vision loss. Teleglaucoma uses stereoscopic digital imaging to take ocular images, which are transmitted electronically to an ocular specialist. The purpose is to synthesize literature to evaluate teleglaucoma, its diagnostic accuracy, healthcare system benefits, and cost-effectiveness. Methods A systematic search was conducted to help locate published and unpublished studies. Studies which evaluate teleglaucoma as a screening device for glaucoma were included. A meta-analysis was conducted to provide estimates of diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic odds ratio, and the relative percentage of glaucoma cases detected. The improvements to healthcare service quality and cost data were assessed. Results Of 11237 studies reviewed, 45 were included. Our results indicated that, teleglaucoma is more specific and less sensitive than in-person examination. The pooled estimates of sensitivity was 0.832 [95% CI 0.770, 0.881] and specificity was 0.790 [95% CI 0.668, 0.876]. The relative odds of a positive screen test in glaucoma cases are 18.7 times more likely than a negative screen test in a non-glaucoma cases. Additionally, the mean cost for every case of glaucoma detected was $1098.67 US and of teleglaucoma per patient screened was $922.77 US. Conclusion Teleglaucoma can accurately discriminate between screen test results with greater odds for positive cases. It detects more cases of glaucoma than in-person examination. Both patients and the healthcare systems benefit from early detection, reduction in wait and travel times, increased specialist referral rates, and cost savings. Teleglaucoma is an effective screening tool for glaucoma specifically for remote and under-services communities.

[1]  Canadian National Institute for the Blind , 1918 .

[2]  H. Quigley Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. , 1996, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  C J Barry,et al.  Evaluation of a portable fundus camera for use in the teleophthalmologic diagnosis of glaucoma. , 1999, Journal of glaucoma.

[4]  A. Juutinen,et al.  The application of teleophthalmology in examining patients with glaucoma: a pilot study. , 1999, Journal of glaucoma.

[5]  R A Tang,et al.  Telemedicine screening of glaucoma. , 1999, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[6]  A handheld CCD Fundus Camera: an alternative to retinal photographs for glaucoma screening and telemedicine? , 1999 .

[7]  K Yogesan,et al.  International transmission of tele-ophthalmology images , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[8]  I. Constable,et al.  Tele-ophthalmology screening for retinal and anterior segment diseases , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[9]  Telemedicine in the control of intra-ocular pressure , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[10]  R. Perez,et al.  Teleophthalmology link between a primary health care centre and a reference hospital. , 2001, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[11]  Internet Based Glaucoma Screening , 2003 .

[12]  Using HRT for Telemedicine in Glaucoma Screening: The Effect of Different Image File Format on Diagnosis of Glaucoma , 2003 .

[13]  G. Labiris,et al.  Tele-ophthalmology and conventional ophthalmology using a mobile medical unit in remote Greece , 2003, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[14]  Marc Berg,et al.  Improving the quality of eye care with tele-ophthalmology: shared-care glaucoma screening , 2004, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[15]  Der-Ming Liou,et al.  Feasibility of tele-ophthalmology for screening for eye disease in remote communities , 2004, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[16]  D. Maberley,et al.  Evaluation of a mobile diabetes care telemedicine clinic serving Aboriginal communities in northern British Columbia, Canada , 2004, International journal of circumpolar health.

[17]  B. Francis,et al.  Peristat: A Computer-Based Perimetry Self-Test for Cost-Effective Population Screening of Glaucoma , 2005, Current eye research.

[18]  I. Constable,et al.  Telemedicine‐friendly, portable tonometers: an evaluation for intraocular pressure screening , 2006, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[19]  R. Raman,et al.  Patient satisfaction levels during teleophthalmology consultation in rural South India. , 2006, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[20]  J. Burr,et al.  Screening for prevention of optic nerve damage due to chronic open angle glaucoma. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[21]  H. Quigley,et al.  The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020 , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[22]  Max Bulsara,et al.  Glaucoma screening: analysis of conventional and telemedicine‐friendly devices , 2007, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[23]  Louis R Pasquale,et al.  Detection of glaucoma-like optic discs in a diabetes teleretinal program. , 2007, Optometry.

[24]  DICOM transmission of simultaneous stereoscopic images of the optic nerve in patients with glaucoma , 2007, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[25]  Software-assisted optic nerve assessment for glaucoma tele-screening. , 2008, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[26]  Antoinette de Bont,et al.  Telemedicine in interdisciplinary work practices: On an IT system that met the criteria for success set out by its sponsors, yet failed to become part of every-day clinical routines , 2008, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[27]  Mancho Ng,et al.  Improving Access to Eye Care: Teleophthalmology in Alberta, Canada , 2009, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[28]  Foreign Currency Exchange , 2010 .

[29]  R. Großjohann,et al.  Gesundheitsökonomische Aspekte des telematischen Glaukom-Monitorings , 2011, Der Ophthalmologe.

[30]  Karim F. Damji,et al.  Web Based Stereoscopic Teleglaucoma - Early Experience of a Collaborative Care Model , 2010 .

[31]  Paul P. Lee,et al.  An assessment of the health and economic burdens of glaucoma. , 2011, American journal of ophthalmology.

[32]  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Telemedicine Program for the Detection of Glaucoma with Imaging Devices , 2011 .

[33]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[34]  D. Mackey,et al.  Telemedicine model to prevent blindness from familial glaucoma , 2011, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[35]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[36]  Teleophthalmology aided Vision Centres in Rural South India: Role and Utilization of Services , 2011 .

[37]  [Health economical aspects of telemedical glaucoma monitoring]. , 2011, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[38]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[39]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias). , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[40]  Gerald Gartlehner,et al.  [GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence - indirectness]. , 2012, Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen.

[41]  K. Damji,et al.  The use of teleglaucoma at the University of Alberta , 2012, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[42]  Ben Vandermeer,et al.  Chapter 8: Meta-analysis of Test Performance When There is a “Gold Standard” , 2012, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[43]  Gerald Gartlehner,et al.  [GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence - inconsistency]. , 2012, Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen.

[44]  Albert S Khouri,et al.  Ocular telehealth screenings in an urban community. , 2012, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[45]  V. Moyer,et al.  Screening for HIV: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[46]  Karim F. Damji,et al.  The Muranga Teleophthalmology Study: Comparison of Virtual (Teleglaucoma) with in-Person Clinical Assessment to Diagnose Glaucoma , 2013, Middle East African journal of ophthalmology.

[47]  Rezwan Ahmed,et al.  Screening diabetic and hypertensive patients for ocular pathology using telemedicine technology in rural West Virginia: a retrospective chart review. , 2013, The West Virginia medical journal.

[48]  V. Moyer,et al.  Screening for Glaucoma: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[49]  S. K. Sinha,et al.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of diagnostic & management decision by teleophthalmology using indigenous equipment in comparison with in-clinic assessment of patients , 2013, The Indian journal of medical research.

[50]  Faazil Kassam,et al.  Teleglaucoma: Improving Access and Efficiency for Glaucoma Care , 2012, Middle East African journal of ophthalmology.

[51]  AroraSourabh,et al.  Improved access and cycle time with an "in-house" patient-centered teleglaucoma program versus traditional in-person assessment. , 2014 .

[52]  A. Sommer,et al.  Is Screening for Glaucoma Necessary? A Policy Guide and Analysis , 2014, Journal of ophthalmic & vision research.