Characteristics and Profiles of Moped Crashes in Urban Areas: An In-Depth Study

In this in-depth study, 167 severe injury crashes involving a moped in urban areas in Belgium in 2013 are analyzed. The study provides an overview of the general crash characteristics of and contributing factors to these moped crashes, and identifies typical crash profiles and their characteristics. The representation of class A mopeds (maximum speed 25 km/h [16 mph]; no driving license needed) and class B mopeds (maximum speed 45 km/h [28 mph]; driving license required) in these crashes is approximately fifty-fifty, which seems to imply an over-representation of mopeds class A. The involved moped riders have an average age of 33 and three-quarters are men. Human factors are by far the largest category of contributing factors in moped crashes, factors related to infrastructure and environment play a moderate role, and vehicle-related factors play only a minor role. The most important human factors are psychological factors and risk assessment errors, the main non-human contributing factors are sight obstructions owing to infrastructure or other vehicles. The following crash profiles, grouping similar types of crashes, were identified: crashes between a vehicle turning off and a moped going straight through (18%); crashes caused by the moped rider’s risky behavior (17%); crashes between a moped and another vulnerable road user (13%); crashes resulting from entering or exiting destinations alongside the road (12%); crashes at intersections (other than vehicles turning off) (11%); single-vehicle crashes with loss of control (9%); crashes caused by an error during overtaking (8%); rear-end crashes (3%); and other (9%).

[1]  J. Olsen,et al.  The European Commission , 2020, The European Union.

[2]  T. Brenac,et al.  Diagnostic de sécurité routière sur une ville : intérêt de l'analyse fine de procédures d'accidents tirées aléatoirement , 1996 .

[3]  Thierry Brenac Le concept de scénario type d accident de la circulation et ses applications , 1999 .

[4]  P C Noordzij,et al.  INTEGRATION OF NEEDS OF MOPED AND MOTORCYCLE RIDERS INTO SAFETY MEASURES: REVIEW AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE EUROPEAN RESEARCH PROJECT PROMISING, WORKPACKAGE 3 , 2001 .

[5]  P. V. Elslande,et al.  Accidentologie des cyclomoteurs. Rapport final , 2008 .

[6]  S. Kosola,et al.  Heading for a Fall — Moped and Scooter Accidents from 2002 to 2007 , 2009, Scandinavian journal of surgery : SJS : official organ for the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society.

[7]  P. Schepers,et al.  Single-bicycle crash types and characteristics , 2012 .

[8]  Aurélie Moskal,et al.  Risk factors for injury accidents among moped and motorcycle riders. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  N Haworth,et al.  Powered two wheelers in a changing world-challenges and opportunities. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Nicholas Bellamy,et al.  A comparison of injuries to moped/scooter and motorcycle riders in Queensland, Australia. , 2013, Injury.

[11]  Ross A Blackman,et al.  Comparison of moped, scooter and motorcycle crash risk and crash severity. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Anna Niska,et al.  An international review of the frequency of single-bicycle crashes (SBCs) and their relation to bicycle modal share , 2014, Injury Prevention.

[13]  R. Kranendonk,et al.  PV’s en opnamen van verdachtenverhoren: een wereld van verschil , 2015 .

[14]  Stijn Daniels,et al.  "Crashing the gates" - selection criteria for television news reporting of traffic crashes. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Mette Møller,et al.  Factors contributing to young moped rider accidents in Denmark. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  C. V. D. Eeden,et al.  Forensic expectations: Investigating a crime scene with prior information , 2016 .