Programs for Undergraduate Women in Science and Engineering

We analyze programs for undergraduate women in science and engineering as strategic research sites in the study of disparities between women and men in scientific fields within higher education. Based on responses to a survey of the directors of the universe of these programs in the United States, the findings reveal key patterns in the programs’ (1) definitions of the issues of women in science and engineering, (2) their solutions to address the issues, (3) their goals and perceived success with goals, and (4) their organizational characteristics and relationship to the larger institutional environments. The findings—which are conceptually grounded in the distinction between structural/institutional and individual issues facing women in science—have implications for understanding gender, science, and higher education, and for initiatives undertaken to improve the condition of women in scientific fields. The findings may also inform strategic efforts to reduce gender disparity in other organizational contexts.

[1]  Gerald Holton,et al.  Who Succeeds in Science: The Gender Dimension , 1995 .

[2]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Careers of Young Scientists: , 2001 .

[3]  J. S. Long,et al.  From Scarcity to Visibility: Gender Differences in the Careers of Doctoral Scientists and Engineers. , 2001 .

[4]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The Bases and Use of Power in Organizational Decision Making: The Case of a University. , 1974 .

[5]  S. Green.  How Many Subjects Does It Take To Do A Regression Analysis. , 1991, Multivariate behavioral research.

[6]  Christine M. Cunningham,et al.  BUILDING A STRUCTURE OF SUPPORT: AN INSIDE LOOK AT THE STRUCTURE OF WOMEN IN ENGINEERING PROGRAMS , 2004 .

[7]  Susan E. Cozzens,et al.  23 Science, Government, and the Politics of Knowledge , 1995 .

[8]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[9]  Suzanne G. Brainard,et al.  RETAINING FEMALE UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS IN ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE: 1995 ANNUAL REPORT TO THE ALFRED P. SLOAN FOUNDATION , 1995 .

[10]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  Handbook of Science and Technology Studies , 1995 .

[11]  J. S. Dietz,et al.  Women and the Crossroads of Science: Thoughts on Policy, Research, and Evaluation. , 2002 .

[12]  Robert Birnbaum.  How Colleges Work: The Cybernetics of Academic Organization and Leadership , 1988 .

[13]  S. Montgomery.  Minds for the Making: The Role of Science in American Education, 1750-1990 , 1994 .

[14]  M. F. Fox.  Women in Science and Engineering: Theory, Practice, and Policy in Programs , 1998, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[15]  Daniel Zwillinger,et al.  CRC Standard Probability and Statistics Tables and Formulae, Student Edition , 1999 .

[16]  Mary Frank Fox,et al.  Book Review: Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes by Yu Xie and Kimberlee A. Shauman. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2003 , 2003 .

[17]  Russel S. Hathaway,et al.  Programmatic Efforts Affect Retention of Women in Science and Engineering , 2001 .

[18]  Christopher Davis.  The Equity Equation: Fostering the Advancement of Women in the Sciences, Mathematics, and Engineering , 1996 .

[19]  B. Cortes.  Women’s work: gender equality vs hierarchy in the life sciences , 2008 .

[20]  M. F. Fox.  Institutional Transformation and the Advancement of Women Faculty: The Case of Academic Science and Engineering , 2008 .

[21]  L. Frehill,et al.  Professional women and minorities : a total human resources data compendium , 2008 .

[22]  B. Clewell,et al.  IMPROVING MINORITY RETENTION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A SEARCH FOR EFFECTIVE INSTITUTIONAL PRACTICES , 1986 .

[23]  J. S. Long,et al.  Scientific Careers: Universalism and Particularism , 1995 .

[24]  B. Reskin,et al.  A Sociological Perspective on Gender and Career Outcomes , 2005 .

[25]  Allan Fisher,et al.  Unlocking the Clubhouse : Women in Computing by Allan Fisher , 2015 .

[26]  Catherine Cronin,et al.  Theorizing Progress: Women in Science, Engineering, and Technology in Higher Education , 1999 .

[27]  M. F. Fox.  Gender, Hierarchy, and Science , 2006 .

[28]  S. Brainard.  Student Ownership: The Key to Successful Intervention Programs. , 1992 .

[29]  Power in the Highest Degree: Professionals and the Rise of a New Mandarin Order , 1995 .

[30]  Janet Saltzman Chafetz,et al.  Handbook of the Sociology of Gender , 1999 .

[31]  Paula England,et al.  The Gender Revolution , 2010 .

[32]  Gerald Holton,et al.  Gender Differences in Science Careers: The Project Access Study , 1996 .

[33]  J. Ravetz.  Sociology of Science , 1972, Nature.

[34]  Jane Zimmer Daniels,et al.  Women in Engineering Program Advocates Network , 2006 .

[35]  HAVING THE TALK: ENGAGING ENGINEERING STUDENTS IN DISCUSSIONS ON GENDER AND INEQUITY , 2006 .

[36]  D. Britton.  THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF THE GENDERED ORGANIZATION , 2000 .

[37]  Sharon R. Bird.  Unsettling Universities' Incongruous, Gendered Bureaucratic Structures: A Case-study Approach , 2011 .

[38]  W. Beyer.  CRC Standard Probability And Statistics Tables and Formulae , 1990 .

[39]  Irene F. Goodman.  Final Report of The Women's Experiences in College Engineering (WECE) Project. Executive Summary. , 2002 .

[40]  Beatriz Chu Clewell,et al.  Breaking the barriers : helping female and minority students succeed in mathematics and science , 1992 .

[41]  M. F. Fox.  WOMEN, SCIENCE, AND ACADEMIA , 2001 .

[42]  Karen Bradley,et al.  Equal but Separate? A Cross-National Study of Sex Segregation in Higher Education , 2002, American Sociological Review.

[43]  Caitilyn Allen,et al.  Wiser Women: Fostering Undergraduate Success in Science and Engineering with a Residential Academic Program , 1999 .

[44]  Donald Tomaskovic-Devey.  Women's Work: Gender Equality vs. Hierarchy in the Life Sciences , 2005 .

[45]  L. Edelman,et al.  Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law , 1992, American Journal of Sociology.

[46]  Joan Acker.  HIERARCHIES, JOBS, BODIES: , 1990 .

[47]  D. Meyerson,et al.  Theories of Gender in Organizations: A New Approach to Organizational Analysis and Change1 , 2000 .

[48]  J. Wajcman.  Feminism Confronts Technology , 1991 .

[49]  J. C. Smart,et al.  Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research , 2001, Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research.

[50]  L. Cohen.  The academic department. , 1992 .

[51]  Judith S. Mcilwee,et al.  Women in Engineering: A Promise Unfulfilled? , 1989 .

[52]  S. Southerland,et al.  From marginality to legitimate peripherality: Understanding the essential functions of a women's program , 2008 .

[53]  Marsha Lakes Matyas,et al.  Science and Engineering Programs: On Target for Women?. , 1992 .

[54]  Sue V. Rosser,et al.  Female Friendly Science: Including Women in Curricular Content and Pedagogy in Science. , 1993 .

[55]  Gerhard Sonnert,et al.  Successful Programs for Undergraduate Women in Science and Engineering: Adapting versus Adopting the Institutional Environment , 2009 .