Learning the “Language” of Road Users - How Shall a Self-driving Car Convey Its Intention to Cooperate to Other Human Drivers?

Communication between road users is ruled by road traffic regulations, but there are also implicit laws of communication. Especially lane changes in dense traffic scenarios require not only communicating one’s intention but also cooperating with other drivers. Self-driving vehicles will need to communicate with conventional vehicles on the road during the transition period to full automation. But how does a driver show his willingness to cooperate? A driving simulator study with N = 28 drivers in a dense traffic scenario on the highway was conducted. It was assumed that different lag vehicle reaction behavior on turn signals of the ego driver would influence the ego driver in his subjective evaluation of the situation. Three main effects, deceleration, the amount of velocity reduction and reaction time concerning perceived cooperation were found. The results of the study can be used to design cooperative driving strategies between self-driving and manually driven vehicles.

[1]  Marc Green,et al.  "How Long Does It Take to Stop?" Methodological Analysis of Driver Perception-Brake Times , 2000 .

[2]  K. Ahmed Modeling drivers' acceleration and lane changing behavior , 1999 .

[3]  M. Nees Acceptance of Self-driving Cars , 2016 .

[4]  Berthold Färber Kommunikationsprobleme zwischen autonomen Fahrzeugen und menschlichen Fahrern , 2015 .

[5]  Markus Zimmermann,et al.  A Roland for an Oliver? Subjective perception of cooperation during conditionally automated driving , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS).

[6]  Matthias J. Henning Preparation for lane change manoeuvres: Behavioural indicators and underlying cognitive processes , 2009 .

[7]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[8]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  General Lane-Changing Model MOBIL for Car-Following Models , 2007 .

[9]  Hiroo Ohta INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN DRIVING DISTANCE HEADWAY , 1993 .

[10]  S Buld,et al.  Darstellung und Evaluation eines Trainings zum Fahren in der Fahrsimulation , 2006 .

[11]  G. Johansson,et al.  Drivers' Brake Reaction Times , 1971, Human factors.

[12]  Gerald V. Barrett Feasibility of Studying Driver Reaction to Sudden Pedestrian Emergencies in an Automobile Simulator , 1968, Human factors.

[13]  P. G. Gipps,et al.  A MODEL FOR THE STRUCTURE OF LANE-CHANGING DECISIONS , 1986 .

[14]  Michael Sivak,et al.  Road safety with self-driving vehicles: general limitations and road sharing with conventional vehicles , 2015 .

[15]  Dean P. Chiang,et al.  Braking Response Times for 100 Drivers in the Avoidance of an Unexpected Obstacle as Measured in a Driving Simulator , 1996 .

[16]  Masooda Bashir,et al.  Trust in Automation , 2015, Hum. Factors.

[17]  B. Lenz,et al.  Autonomes Fahren: Technische, rechtliche und gesellschaftliche Aspekte , 2015 .

[18]  O. Heller,et al.  Hörfeldaudiometrie mit dem Verfahren der Kategorienunterteilung (KU) , 1985 .

[19]  M. Ben-Akiva,et al.  Modeling Cooperative Lane Changing and Forced Merging Behavior , 2007 .

[20]  P. Watzlawick,et al.  Menschliche Kommunikation : Formen, Störungen, Parodoxien , 1996 .