Bone Regenerative Potential of Cross-Linked Collagen Membrane in Peri-Implant Osseous Defect: Case Series with Histologic/Micro-Computed Tomographic Findings

The role of a barrier membrane is crucial in guided bone regeneration (GBR) for space creation and cell occlusiveness. Those properties of the membrane should be sustained for a sufficient period. For such purpose, several cross-linked collagen membranes were introduced and demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes. However, histologic data were not sufficient to support the effect of cross-linked collagen membranes. In the present case series, healing after GBR using a cross-linked collagen membrane was investigated in-depth via histologic and micro-computed tomographic (micro-CT) analyses. 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide cross-linked collagen membrane was used in GBR for treating various peri-implant bone defects in seven patients. After 4–7 months of healing, newly formed tissue of hard consistency was observed over the implant platform. This tissue was carefully harvested and assessed. In micro-CT and histological analyses, evident new bone formation was revealed, especially in the vicinity of the collagen membrane. Moreover, it was histologically found that some newly formed bone was in intimate contact with the membrane. Although the exact mechanism of bone regeneration in the present cases was not clearly elucidated, the cross-linked collagen membrane appeared to contribute to ossification in GBR. Further studies are needed to confirm the findings of the present case series.

[1]  M. Karobari,et al.  Treatment of a large through and through periapical lesion using guided tissue regeneration: A case report of 2 years follow‐up , 2022, Clinical case reports.

[2]  G. Benic,et al.  The effect of collagen membrane and of bone substitute on lateral bone augmentation with titanium mesh: An experimental in vivo study. , 2022, Clinical oral implants research.

[3]  K. Rungcharassaeng,et al.  Exposure of Barriers Used in GBR: Rate, Timing, Management, And Its Effect on Grafted Bone. A Retrospective Analysis. , 2021, The Journal of oral implantology.

[4]  M. Sanz,et al.  Immunohistochemical characteristics of lateral bone augmentation using different biomaterials around chronic peri-implant dehiscence defects: An experimental in vivo study. , 2021, Clinical oral implants research.

[5]  Seong-Ho Choi,et al.  Diverse patterns of bone regeneration in rabbit calvarial defects depending on the type of collagen membrane , 2020, Journal of periodontal & implant science.

[6]  R. Jung,et al.  Local tissue effects of various barrier membranes in a rat subcutaneous model , 2020, Journal of periodontal & implant science.

[7]  L. Gobbato,et al.  Selection of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration: A Literature Review , 2020, Materials.

[8]  Seong-Ho Choi,et al.  Distinctive bone regeneration of calvarial defects using biphasic calcium phosphate supplemented ultraviolet-crosslinked collagen membrane , 2019, Journal of periodontal & implant science.

[9]  N. N. Aldini,et al.  A Proposal of Pseudo-periosteum Classification After GBR by Means of Titanium-Reinforced d-PTFE Membranes or Titanium Meshes Plus Cross-Linked Collagen Membranes. , 2019, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[10]  R. Jung,et al.  Randomized clinical study assessing two membranes for guided bone regeneration of peri‐implant bone defects: clinical and histological outcomes at 6 months , 2017, Clinical oral implants research.

[11]  W. Zechner,et al.  Guided Bone Regeneration with Collagen Membranes and Particulate Graft Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2017, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[12]  M. Glogauer,et al.  Collagen based barrier membranes for periodontal guided bone regeneration applications , 2016, Odontology.

[13]  Seong-Ho Choi,et al.  Guided bone regeneration using 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC)-cross-linked type-I collagen membrane with biphasic calcium phosphate at rabbit calvarial defects , 2015, Biomaterials Research.

[14]  M. Chiapasco,et al.  Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations: a systematic review. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[15]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Clinical and histologic evaluation of allogeneic bone matrix versus autogenous bone chips associated with titanium-reinforced e-PTFE membrane for vertical ridge augmentation: a prospective pilot study. , 2008, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[16]  A. Goldlust,et al.  Ossification of a collagen membrane cross-linked by sugar: a human case series. , 2008, Journal of periodontology.

[17]  Thorkild Karring,et al.  Vertical ridge augmentation with guided bone regeneration in association with dental implants: an experimental study in dogs. , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.

[18]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  “PASS” Principles for Predictable Bone Regeneration , 2006, Implant dentistry.

[19]  F. Schwarz,et al.  Biodegradation of differently cross-linked collagen membranes: an experimental study in the rat. , 2005, Clinical oral implants research.

[20]  J. Bernimoulin,et al.  Histological assessment of augmented jaw bone utilizing a new collagen barrier membrane compared to a standard barrier membrane to protect a granular bone substitute material. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[21]  R. Yukna,et al.  Collagen Membrane Resorption in Dogs: A Comparative Study , 2001, Implant dentistry.

[22]  S. Nyman,et al.  Healing of Bone Defects by Guided Tissue Regeneration , 1988, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[23]  H. Traxler,et al.  Effectiveness of Two Different Lingual Flap Advancing Techniques for Vertical Bone Augmentation in the Posterior Mandible: A Comparative, Split-Mouth Cadaver Study. , 2018, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[24]  G. Romanos,et al.  Limitations and options using resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes for successful guided bone regeneration. , 2017, Quintessence international.

[25]  A. Goldlust,et al.  Ossification of a novel cross-linked porcine collagen barrier in guided bone regeneration in dogs. , 2007, Journal of periodontology.

[26]  P Schärer,et al.  Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss for guided bone regeneration. , 1997, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[27]  D. Buser,et al.  Healing pattern of bone regeneration in membrane-protected defects: a histologic study in the canine mandible. , 1994, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.