Photoinitiation chemistry affects light transmission and degree of conversion of curing experimental dental resin composites.

INTRODUCTION The effect of photoinitiator and co-initiator chemistry on the setting reaction and degree of conversion of dental resin-based composites (RBCs) has rarely been determined explicitly. This work examines the effect of type and concentration of photoinitiator and co-initiator on the rate of change of light transmission throughout polymerisation and degree of conversion of model RBC formulations. METHODS Bisphenol-A diglycidyl ether dimethacrylate (bis-GMA) and triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) (6:4 molar ratio) resins filled with silanized glass filler (74wt.%) and containing various photoinitiators (camphorquinone; CQ, 1-phenyl-1,2-propanedione; PPD, benzil; BZ), co-initiator types (N,N-dimethyl-p-amino benzoic acid ethyl ester; DABE, N,N-cyanoethyl methylaniline; CEMA, N,N-diethanol-p-toluidine; DEPT) and concentration (0.0-0.3% DABE) were polymerised using a halogen or LED light curing-unit (LCU) for 10, 20 and 40s. The setting reaction was monitored in real-time by measuring the light transmittance through the curing specimen and bulk degree of conversion (DC) evaluated using Fourier transform infra-red spectroscopy. RESULTS Specimens containing CQ and PPD cured with the halogen LCU did not have a significant effect on DC or changes in light transmission, although a significant increase in DC was observed for CQ compared with PPD specimens cured with the LED LCU. DABE and CEMA were more effective co-initiators than DEPT. Although DC was not limited by co-initiator concentration, the absence of a co-initiator resulted in marked differences in light transmission and decreased DC throughout 40s irradiation with each LCU type. CONCLUSIONS The spectral range emitted from different types of LCU and absorption characteristics of the photoinitiator chemistry of light-activated resin-based composites play a critical role in the efficiency of polymerisation.

[1]  Norman S. Allen,et al.  Photoinitiators for UV and visible curing of coatings: Mechanisms and properties , 1996 .

[2]  J. Ferracane,et al.  In vitro aging of dental composites in water--effect of degree of conversion, filler volume, and filler/matrix coupling. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  A. Peutzfeldt,et al.  Influence of composition on rate of polymerization contraction of light-curing resin composites , 2002, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[4]  C. Bowman,et al.  Probing the origins and control of shrinkage stress in dental resin composites. II. Novel method of simultaneous measurement of polymerization shrinkage stress and conversion. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[5]  J. Stansbury Curing dental resins and composites by photopolymerization. , 2000, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[6]  M. Taira,et al.  Analysis of Photo-initiators in Visible-light-cured Dental Composite Resins , 1988, Journal of dental research.

[7]  P. Marquis,et al.  Monomer conversion versus flexure strength of a novel dental composite. , 2003, Journal of dentistry.

[8]  E. Asmussen Factors affecting the quantity of remaining double bonds in restorative resin polymers. , 1982, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[9]  A. Shortall,et al.  Light-activated restorative materials: a method of determining effective radiation times. , 1996, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[10]  D C Watts,et al.  Light intensity effects on resin-composite degree of conversion and shrinkage strain. , 2000, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[11]  H R Rawls,et al.  Development of a new photoinitiation system for dental light-cure composite resins. , 1999, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[12]  R. Sakaguchi,et al.  Reduced light energy density decreases post-gel contraction while maintaining degree of conversion in composites , 1998 .

[13]  F. Rueggeberg,et al.  Resin cure determination by polymerization shrinkage. , 1995, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[14]  E. Greener,et al.  Effect of photoinitiator on degree of conversion of unfilled light-cured resin. , 1994, Journal of dentistry.

[15]  David C Watts,et al.  Shrinkage strain-rates of dental resin-monomer and composite systems. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[16]  F. Rueggeberg,et al.  Calibration of FTIR conversion analysis of contemporary dental resin composites. , 1990, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[17]  J. W. Curtis,et al.  Effect of light intensity and exposure duration on cure of resin composite. , 1994, Operative dentistry.

[18]  C. Chung,et al.  Development of a new photocurable composite resin with reduced curing shrinkage. , 2002, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[19]  F. Catalina,et al.  Photochemistry of carbonyl photoinitiators. Photopolymerisation, flash photolysis and spectroscopic study , 1986 .

[20]  William M Palin,et al.  In vitro cuspal deflection and microleakage of maxillary premolars restored with novel low-shrink dental composites. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[21]  G. Fleming,et al.  Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with a packable composite cured in bulk or in increments. , 2003, Journal of dentistry.

[22]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Contraction stress related to degree of conversion and reaction kinetics. , 2002, Journal of dental research.

[23]  D. Truffier-Boutry,et al.  Volume contraction in photocured dental resins: the shrinkage-conversion relationship revisited. , 2006, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[24]  I. E. Ruyter,et al.  Composites for use in posterior teeth: composition and conversion. , 1987, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[25]  A. Shortall,et al.  Thermal changes and cure depths associated with a high intensity light activation unit. , 2004, E -journal of dentistry.

[26]  F. Rueggeberg,et al.  Effect of photoinitiator level on properties of a light-cured and post-cure heated model resin system. , 1997, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[27]  F. Rueggeberg,et al.  Molar extinction coefficients and the photon absorption efficiency of dental photoinitiators and light curing units. , 2005, Journal of dentistry.

[28]  M. Taira,et al.  Refractive index of inorganic fillers in seven visible-light-cured dental composite resins , 1994 .

[29]  C. Davidson,et al.  Energy dependent polymerization of resin-based composite. , 2002, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[30]  A. Shortall,et al.  Effect of exposure intensity and post-cure temperature storage on hardness of contemporary photo-activated composites. , 2001, Journal of dentistry.

[31]  T. Corrales,et al.  Free radical macrophotoinitiators: an overview on recent advances , 2003 .

[32]  C. Davidson,et al.  Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.

[33]  A. Yap,et al.  Influence of light energy density on effectiveness of composite cure. , 2001, Operative dentistry.