Contemporary Patterns of Spontaneous Labor With Normal Neonatal Outcomes

OBJECTIVE: To use contemporary labor data to examine the labor patterns in a large, modern obstetric population in the United States. METHODS: Data were from the Consortium on Safe Labor, a multicenter retrospective study that abstracted detailed labor and delivery information from electronic medical records in 19 hospitals across the United States. A total of 62,415 parturients were selected who had a singleton term gestation, spontaneous onset of labor, vertex presentation, vaginal delivery, and a normal perinatal outcome. A repeated-measures analysis was used to construct average labor curves by parity. An interval-censored regression was used to estimate duration of labor, stratified by cervical dilation at admission and centimeter by centimeter. RESULTS: Labor may take more than 6 hours to progress from 4 to 5 cm and more than 3 hours to progress from 5 to 6 cm of dilation. Nulliparous and multiparous women appeared to progress at a similar pace before 6 cm. However, after 6 cm, labor accelerated much faster in multiparous than in nulliparous women. The 95th percentiles of the second stage of labor in nulliparous women with and without epidural analgesia were 3.6 and 2.8 hours, respectively. A partogram for nulliparous women is proposed. CONCLUSION: In a large, contemporary population, the rate of cervical dilation accelerated after 6 cm, and progress from 4 cm to 6 cm was far slower than previously described. Allowing labor to continue for a longer period before 6 cm of cervical dilation may reduce the rate of intrapartum and subsequent repeat cesarean deliveries in the United States. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III

[1]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. , 2010, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  A. Zimerman,et al.  The natural history of the normal first stage of labor. , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  D. Rouse,et al.  What Is A Failed Labor Induction? , 2006, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  Jun Yan Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data , 2004 .

[5]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  D. Rouse,et al.  Criteria for Failed Labor Induction: Prospective Evaluation of a Standardized Protocol , 2000, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  L. Albers,et al.  The Length of Active Labor in Normal Pregnancies , 1996, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  Richard H. Jones Analysis of repeated measures , 1992 .

[9]  B. Dujardin,et al.  Value of the alert and action lines on the partogram , 1992, The Lancet.

[10]  M. Rosen,et al.  Transition from Latent to Active Labor , 1986, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  R. H. Philpott,et al.  CERVICOGRAPHS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF LABOUR IN PRIMIGRAVIDAE , 1972, The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Commonwealth.

[12]  Philpott Rh,et al.  Cervicographs in the management of labour in primigravidae. II. The action line and treatment of abnormal labour. , 1972 .

[13]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  The graphic analysis of labor. , 1959, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Primigravid labor; a graphicostatistical analysis. , 1955, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  T. Lavender,et al.  Effect of partogram use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[16]  J. Troendle,et al.  Methodological challenges in studying labour progression in contemporary practice. , 2006, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[17]  R. Lyons Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews , 2006 .

[18]  World Health Organization partograph in management of labour. World Health Organization Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood Programme. , 1994, Lancet.

[19]  E. A. Friedman Labor: Clinical evaluation and management , 1978 .