Multiple attribute decision making: approach integrating subjective and objective information

This paper proposes a subjective and objective integrated approach to solve multiple attribute decision making (MADM) problems with preference information on alternatives. In this approach, decision-makers' subjective preference information on alternatives can be represented in eight different formats: preference orderings, utility values, fuzzy preference relation, linguistic terms, normal preference relation, selected subset, fuzzy selected subset and pairwise comparison. The various formats on preference information are uniformed into the format on fuzzy preference relation and aggregated into a social subjective fuzzy preference relation. To reflect both the decision-makers' subjective preference information and the objective information from the decision matrix, the resulting social subjective fuzzy preference relation and the objective fuzzy preference relation derived from the decision matrix are integrated into a synthetic fuzzy preference relation. Based on the synthetic fuzzy preference relation, the fuzzy majority method is used to obtain the quantifier guided dominance degree (QGDD) and the quantifier guided non-dominance degree (QGNDD) of each alternative. According to the QGDD and QGNDD of the alternatives, the selection of them is done. An example is also used to illustrate the applicability of the proposed approach.

[1]  Jian Ma,et al.  A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Multiperson decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[4]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Combining Numerical and Linguistic Information in Group Decision Making , 1998, Inf. Sci..

[5]  S. Orlovsky Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation , 1978 .

[6]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  Evaluating attack helicopters by AHP based on linguistic variable weight , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  H. Nurmi Approaches to collective decision making with fuzzy preference relations , 1981 .

[8]  E. Turban,et al.  Electronic Commerce: A Managerial Perspective , 1999 .

[9]  Dengfeng Li,et al.  Fuzzy multiattribute decision-making models and methods with incomplete preference information , 1999, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[10]  R. Yager Families of OWA operators , 1993 .

[11]  Etienne E. Kerre,et al.  Defuzzification: criteria and classification , 1999, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[12]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision-making , 1988 .

[13]  T. Tanino Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making , 1984 .

[14]  J. Kacprzyk Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority , 1986 .

[15]  L. Hong Integrated Approach to Two Kind of Preference Information in Group Decision Making , 2000 .

[16]  Jerome Yen,et al.  The negotiable alternatives identifier for group negotiation support , 1999, Appl. Math. Comput..

[17]  J. Kacprzyk,et al.  Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority , 1992 .

[18]  Zülal Güngör,et al.  A fuzzy outranking method in energy policy planning , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[19]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[20]  Shan Feng,et al.  Decision support for fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of urban development , 1999, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[21]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[22]  J. Voogd,et al.  Multicriteria evaluation for urban and regional planning , 1982 .

[23]  F. Herrera,et al.  A classification method of alternatives for multiple preference ordering criteria based on fuzzy majority. , 1996 .

[24]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations , 1998, Fuzzy Sets Syst..