Visualising inter-subject variability in fMRI using threshold-weighted overlap maps

Functional neuroimaging studies are revealing the neural systems sustaining many sensory, motor and cognitive abilities. A proper understanding of these systems requires an appreciation of the degree to which they vary across subjects. Some sources of inter-subject variability might be easy to measure (demographics, behavioural scores, or experimental factors), while others are more difficult (cognitive strategies, learning effects, and other hidden sources). Here, we introduce a simple way of visualising whole-brain consistency and variability in brain responses across subjects using threshold-weighted voxel-based overlap maps. The output quantifies the proportion of subjects activating a particular voxel or region over a wide range of statistical thresholds. The sensitivity of our approach was assessed in 30 healthy adults performing a matching task with their dominant hand. We show how overlap maps revealed many effects that were only present in a subsample of our group; we discuss how overlap maps can provide information that may be missed or misrepresented by standard group analysis, and how this information can help users to understand their data. In particular, we emphasize that functional overlap maps can be particularly useful when it comes to explaining typical (or atypical) compensatory mechanisms used by patients following brain damage.

[1]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Group analysis in functional neuroimaging: selecting subjects using similarity measures , 2003, NeuroImage.

[2]  Steven D. Beyea,et al.  Thresholds in fMRI studies: Reliable for single subjects? , 2013, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[3]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  M. Seghier,et al.  Functional Subdivisions in the Left Angular Gyrus Where the Semantic System Meets and Diverges from the Default Network , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Diagnosis of single‐subject and group fMRI data with SPMd , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[6]  Jeffrey R. Binder,et al.  Alternative thresholding methods for fMRI data optimized for surgical planning , 2014, NeuroImage.

[7]  Turhan Canli,et al.  Variance maps as a novel tool for localizing regions of interest in imaging studies of individual differences , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[8]  Benjamin Thyreau,et al.  Detecting outliers in high-dimensional neuroimaging datasets with robust covariance estimators , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[9]  Alexandra J. Golby,et al.  A Surgical Planning Method for Functional MRI Assessment of Language Dominance: Influences from Threshold, Region-of-Interest, and Stimulus Mode , 2008, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[10]  Ferath Kherif,et al.  Explaining Function with Anatomy: Language Lateralization and Corpus Callosum Size , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  M. Erb,et al.  Interindividual variation of cerebral activation during encoding and retrieval of words , 2000, European Psychiatry.

[12]  Mark E. Bastin,et al.  Single subject fMRI test–retest reliability metrics and confounding factors , 2013, NeuroImage.

[13]  Pierre Soille,et al.  Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications , 2003 .

[14]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  New method for fMRI investigations of language: defining ROIs functionally in individual subjects. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Genetic Contribution to Variation in Cognitive Function: An fMRI Study in Twins , 2009, Science.

[16]  Ranjan Maitra,et al.  A re-defined and generalized percent-overlap-of-activation measure for studies of fMRI reproducibility and its use in identifying outlier activation maps , 2010, NeuroImage.

[17]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Bridging psychology and biology. The analysis of individuals in groups. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[18]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Analysis of a large fMRI cohort: Statistical and methodological issues for group analyses , 2007, NeuroImage.

[19]  Cathy J. Price,et al.  Dissociating functional brain networks by decoding the between-subject variability , 2009, NeuroImage.

[20]  James T Voyvodic,et al.  fMRI activation mapping as a percentage of local excitation: Consistent presurgical motor maps without threshold adjustment , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  Mark E. Bastin,et al.  Adaptive thresholding for reliable topological inference in single subject fMRI analysis , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[22]  Mohamed L. Seghier,et al.  Laterality index in functional MRI: methodological issues☆ , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[23]  Arvind Caprihan,et al.  Same task, different strategies: How brain networks can be influenced by memory strategy , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[24]  Maximilian Riesenhuber,et al.  Individual Variability in Location Impacts Orthographic Selectivity in the “Visual Word Form Area” , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Joseph T. Devlin,et al.  Consistency and variability in functional localisers , 2009, NeuroImage.

[26]  Matthew C. Keller,et al.  Increased sensitivity in neuroimaging analyses using robust regression , 2005, NeuroImage.

[27]  Semir Zeki,et al.  The experience of mathematical beauty and its neural correlates , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[28]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Individual differences in cognitive style and strategy predict similarities in the patterns of brain activity between individuals , 2012, NeuroImage.

[29]  Cathy J. Price,et al.  Dissecting the functional anatomy of auditory word repetition , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[30]  H. Brückmann,et al.  Reproducibility of activation in four motor paradigms. An fMRI study. , 2006, Journal of neurology.

[31]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Understanding the effects of task-specific practice in the brain: Insights from individual-differences analyses , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[32]  Wen-Yih Isaac Tseng,et al.  AveLI: A robust lateralization index in functional magnetic resonance imaging using unbiased threshold-free computation , 2012, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[33]  Michael S. Beauchamp,et al.  FMRI group analysis combining effect estimates and their variances , 2012, NeuroImage.

[34]  James T Voyvodic,et al.  Reproducibility of single‐subject fMRI language mapping with AMPLE normalization , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[35]  K. Heilman,et al.  Functional imaging: heterogeneity in task strategy and functional anatomy and the case for individual analysis. , 1998, Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology.

[36]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Extensive Individual Differences in Brain Activations Associated with Episodic Retrieval are Reliable Over Time , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  Asaid Khateb,et al.  Group analysis and the subject factor in functional magnetic resonance imaging: Analysis of fifty right‐handed healthy subjects in a semantic language task , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[38]  Harold Burton,et al.  Cortical network for vibrotactile attention: A fMRI study , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[39]  Alexandra J. Golby,et al.  Functional MRI of memory in the hippocampus: Laterality indices may be more meaningful if calculated from whole voxel distributions , 2006, NeuroImage.

[40]  N Jon Shah,et al.  Assessment of reliability in functional imaging studies , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[41]  Alexandra J. Golby,et al.  Threshold-independent functional MRI determination of language dominance: A validation study against clinical gold standards , 2009, Epilepsy & Behavior.

[42]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Capturing inter-subject variability with group independent component analysis of fMRI data: A simulation study , 2012, NeuroImage.

[43]  T. L. Davis,et al.  Language dominance determined by whole brain functional MRI in patients with brain lesions , 1999, Neurology.

[44]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Detecting subject-specific activations using fuzzy clustering , 2007, NeuroImage.

[45]  W H Theodore,et al.  Limitations to plasticity of language network reorganization in localization related epilepsy. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[46]  Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Word learning is mediated by the left arcuate fasciculus , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Cathy J. Price,et al.  Functional Heterogeneity within the Default Network during Semantic Processing and Speech Production , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[48]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  Subject-specific functional localizers increase . . . , 2012 .

[49]  Nicole A Lazar,et al.  Assessing the sensitivity of fMRI group maps , 2004, NeuroImage.

[50]  Yang Jiang,et al.  Individual differences in cognition, affect, and performance: Behavioral, neuroimaging, and molecular genetic approaches , 2012, NeuroImage.

[51]  Ferath Kherif,et al.  The Main Sources of Intersubject Variability in Neuronal Activation for Reading Aloud , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  Richard Robinson,et al.  fMRI Beyond the Clinic: Will It Ever Be Ready for Prime Time? , 2004, PLoS biology.

[53]  Beatriz Luna,et al.  Combining Brains: A Survey of Methods for Statistical Pooling of Information , 2002, NeuroImage.

[54]  Michael B. Miller,et al.  How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging? , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[55]  François Lazeyras,et al.  Anatomical variability of the lateral frontal lobe surface: implication for intersubject variability in language neuroimaging , 2005, NeuroImage.

[56]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Location and spatial profile of category‐specific regions in human extrastriate cortex , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[57]  V Bosch,et al.  Statistical analysis of multi‐subject fMRI data: Assessment of focal activations , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[58]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  A spatially unbiased atlas template of the human cerebellum , 2006, NeuroImage.