A Utility-Aware General Framework With Quantifiable Privacy Preservation for Destination Prediction in LBSs

Destination prediction plays an important role as the basis for a variety of location-based services (LBSs). However, it poses many threats to users’ location privacy. Most related work ignores privacy preservation in destination prediction. Few studies focus on specific kinds of privacy-preserving destination prediction algorithms and thus are not applicable to other prediction methods. Furthermore, the third party involved in these studies is a potential privacy threat. Additionally, another line of related work regarding LBSs neither guarantees the utility of the predicted results nor provides quantifiable privacy preservation. To this end, in this paper, we propose a general framework that can provide quantifiable privacy preservation and obtain a trade-off between the privacy and the utility of the predicted results by utilizing differential privacy and a neural network model. Specifically, it first adopts a specially designed differential privacy to construct a data-driven privacy-preserving model that formulates the relationship between injected noise and privacy preservation. Then, it combines a Recurrent Neural Network and Multi-hill Climbing to add fine-grained noise to obtain the trade-off between the privacy preservation and the utility of the predicted results. Our extensive experiments on real-world datasets validate that the proposed framework can be applied to different prediction methods, provide quantifiable location privacy preservation, and guarantee the utility of the predicted results simultaneously.

[1]  Jianbin Huang,et al.  An Efficient Destination Prediction Approach Based on Future Trajectory Prediction and Transition Matrix Optimization , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[2]  Xi Wen,et al.  A Trajectory Privacy-Preserving Scheme Based on Dual-K Mechanism for Continuous Location-Based Services , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing with Applications and 2017 IEEE International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Communications (ISPA/IUCC).

[3]  James B. D. Joshi,et al.  POSTER: Compromising Cloaking-based Location Privacy Preserving Mechanisms with Location Injection Attacks , 2014, CCS.

[4]  Qinghua Li,et al.  Achieving k-anonymity in privacy-aware location-based services , 2014, IEEE INFOCOM 2014 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications.

[5]  Lifa Wu,et al.  A novel destination prediction attack and corresponding location privacy protection method in geo-social networks , 2017, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[6]  Ximeng Liu,et al.  Real-Time Privacy-Preserving Data Release Over Vehicle Trajectory , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[7]  Xing Xie,et al.  Destination prediction by sub-trajectory synthesis and privacy protection against such prediction , 2013, 2013 IEEE 29th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE).

[8]  Xiao Han,et al.  Location Privacy-Preserving Task Allocation for Mobile Crowdsensing with Differential Geo-Obfuscation , 2017, WWW.

[9]  Chen Wang,et al.  RobLoP: Towards Robust Privacy Preserving Against Location Dependent Attacks in Continuous LBS Queries , 2018, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[10]  Jieping Ye,et al.  A Taxi Order Dispatch Model based On Combinatorial Optimization , 2017, KDD.

[11]  Junshan Zhang,et al.  From Social Group Utility Maximization to Personalized Location Privacy in Mobile Networks , 2017, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[12]  Catuscia Palamidessi,et al.  Geo-indistinguishability: differential privacy for location-based systems , 2012, CCS.

[13]  Zhu Xiao,et al.  Drive2friends: Inferring Social Relationships From Individual Vehicle Mobility Data , 2020, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[14]  Yu Zheng,et al.  T-Drive trajectory data sample , 2011 .

[15]  Kun Xie,et al.  Synthesizing Privacy Preserving Traces: Enhancing Plausibility With Social Networks , 2019, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[16]  Panagiotis Papadimitratos,et al.  Ieee Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, Special Issue on " Security and Privacy in Mobile Platforms " , 2014 Hiding in the Mobile Crowd: Location Privacy through Collaboration , 2022 .

[17]  Xiang Li,et al.  T-DesP: Destination Prediction Based on Big Trajectory Data , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[18]  Li Xiong,et al.  Protecting Locations with Differential Privacy under Temporal Correlations , 2014, CCS.

[19]  Qing Li,et al.  Multi-Scale and Multi-Scope Convolutional Neural Networks for Destination Prediction of Trajectories , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[20]  Chris Dyer,et al.  Neural Arithmetic Logic Units , 2018, NeurIPS.

[21]  Feng Zhu,et al.  On Prediction of User Destination by Sub-Trajectory Understanding: A Deep Learning based Approach , 2018, CIKM.

[22]  Pascal Vincent,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks Applied to Taxi Destination Prediction , 2015, DC@PKDD/ECML.

[23]  Jieping Ye,et al.  Taxi or Hitchhiking: Predicting Passenger's Preferred Service on Ride Sharing Platforms , 2018, SIGIR.

[24]  Arun Iyengar,et al.  Location Privacy-preserving Mechanisms in Location-based Services , 2021, ACM Comput. Surv..

[25]  Chen Wang,et al.  P3-LOC: A Privacy-Preserving Paradigm-Driven Framework for Indoor Localization , 2018, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[26]  Philippe C. Besse,et al.  Destination Prediction by Trajectory Distribution-Based Model , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[27]  Bin Guo,et al.  Moving Destination Prediction Using Sparse Dataset , 2017, ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data.