Simulation of high-frequency sinusoidal electrical block of mammalian myelinated axons

High frequency alternating current (HFAC) sinusoidal waveforms can block conduction in mammalian peripheral nerves. A mammalian axon model was used to simulate the response of nerves to HFAC conduction block. Sinusoidal waveforms from 1  to 40 kHz were delivered to eight simulated axon diameters ranging from 7.3  to 16 μm. Conduction block was obtained between 3  to 40 kHz. The minimum peak to peak current at which block was obtained, defined as the block threshold, increased with increasing frequency. Block threshold varied inversely with axon diameter. Upon initiation, the HFAC waveform produced one or more action potentials. These simulation results closely parallel previous experimental results of high frequency motor block of the rat sciatic and cat pudendal nerve. During HFAC block, the axons showed a dynamic steady state depolarization of multiple nodes, strongly suggesting a depolarization mechanism for HFAC conduction block.

[1]  D. Mcneal,et al.  Response of single alpha motoneurons to high-frequency pulse trains. Firing behavior and conduction block phenomenon. , 1986, Applied neurophysiology.

[2]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Modeling the excitability of mammalian nerve fibers: influence of afterpotentials on the recovery cycle. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  V. Krauthamer,et al.  Effects of high-rate electrical stimulation upon firing in modelled and real neurons , 2002, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[4]  Niloy Bhadra,et al.  High‐frequency electrical conduction block of mammalian peripheral motor nerve , 2005, Muscle & nerve.

[5]  D. Durand,et al.  Modeling the effects of electric fields on nerve fibers: Determination of excitation thresholds , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  J. A. TANNER,et al.  Reversible Blocking of Nerve Conduction by Alternating-Current Excitation , 1962, Nature.

[7]  A. Forbes,et al.  QUANTITATIVE STUDIES OF THE NERVE IMPULSE , 1929 .

[8]  E Eldred,et al.  Control of muscle contractile force through indirect high-frequency stimulation. , 1983, American journal of physical medicine.

[9]  J. Roppolo,et al.  Simulation of nerve block by high-frequency sinusoidal electrical current based on the Hodgkin-Huxley model , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  K. Kilgore,et al.  Nerve conduction block utilising high-frequency alternating current , 2004, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[11]  Hugh Bostock,et al.  Action potentials and membrane currents in the human node of Ranvier , 1995, Pflügers Archiv.

[13]  Changfeng Tai,et al.  Response of external urethral sphincter to high frequency biphasic electrical stimulation of pudendal nerve. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[14]  M Y WOO,et al.  ASYNCHRONOUS FIRING AND BLOCK OF PERIPHERAL NERVE CONDUCTION BY 20 KC ALTERNATING CURRENT. , 1964, Bulletin of the Los Angeles Neurological Society.

[15]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1990 .

[16]  M M Elhilali,et al.  Stimulator design and subsequent stimulation parameter optimization for controlling micturition and reducing urethral resistance. , 1996, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[17]  M. Zimmermann Selective activation of C-fibers , 2004, Pflüger's Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere.

[18]  Nicholas T. Carnevale,et al.  The NEURON Simulation Environment , 1997, Neural Computation.

[19]  N. Bhadra,et al.  Direct current electrical conduction block of peripheral nerve , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[20]  Niloy Bhadra,et al.  High frequency electrical conduction block of the pudendal nerve , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[21]  Brian J. Andrews,et al.  Localized electrical nerve blocking , 1996, Proceedings of 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[22]  W. Grill,et al.  Inversion of the current-distance relationship by transient depolarization , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  Changfeng Tai,et al.  Simulation analysis of conduction block in unmyelinated axons induced by high-frequency biphasic electrical currents , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Frank Rattay,et al.  Electrical Nerve Stimulation , 1990 .

[25]  D.B. McCreery,et al.  Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  M. Zimmermann,et al.  Differential blocking of myelinated nerve fibres by transient depolarization , 1973, Pflügers Archiv.

[27]  J. B. Ranck,et al.  Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: A review , 1975, Brain Research.

[28]  A. G. Richardson,et al.  Modelling the effects of electric fields on nerve fibres: Influence of the myelin sheath , 2000, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.