Computational studies to understand the role of social learning in team familiarity and its effects on team performance

This paper concerns social learning modes and their effects on team performance. Social learning, such as by observing others' actions and their outcomes, allows members of a team to learn what other members know. Knowing what other members know can reduce task communication and co-ordination overhead, which helps the team to perform faster since members can devote their attention to their tasks. This paper describes agent-based simulation studies using a computational model that implements different social learning modes as parameters that can be controlled in the simulations. The results show that social learning from both direct and indirect observations positively contributes to learning about what others know, but the value of social learning is sensitive to prior familiarity such that minimum thresholds of team familiarity are needed to realise the benefits of social learning. This threshold increases with task complexity. These findings clarify the level of influence that sociality has on social learning and sets up a formal framework by which to conduct studies on how social context influences learning and group performance.

[1]  R. Ziller,et al.  Group creativity under conditions of success or failure and variations in group stability. , 1962 .

[2]  M. Macy,et al.  FROM FACTORS TO ACTORS: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling , 2002 .

[3]  Johann Packendorff,et al.  INQUIRING INTO THE TEMPORARY ORGANIZATION: NEW DIRECTIONS FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT RESEARCH , 1995 .

[4]  Linda Argote,et al.  First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity , 2010 .

[5]  Linda Argote,et al.  Organizational Learning and Forgetting: The Effects of Turnover and Structure , 2006 .

[6]  Elliot E. Entin,et al.  Adaptive Team Coordination , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[7]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  M. Tomasello The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition , 2000 .

[9]  D. P. Leyden,et al.  Familiarity and Group Productivity , 1991 .

[10]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Patterns of Product Development Interactions , 2002 .

[11]  Chih-Shing Wei,et al.  Assessing communication modes in design project teams , 2001, 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Impact on Engineering and Science Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37193).

[12]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Temporary assignments and a permanent home : A case study in the transition to project-based organizational practices , 2002 .

[13]  Amar Gupta,et al.  The Use of Information Systems in Collocated and Distributed Teams: A Test of the 24-Hour Knowledge Factory , 2006 .

[14]  Victoria J. Marsick,et al.  Lessons from Informal and Incidental Learning , 1997 .

[15]  B. Staats Unpacking Team Familiarity: The Effects of Geographic Location and Hierarchical Role , 2012 .

[16]  Nancy Lemon,et al.  Climbing the Value Chain: A Case Study in Rethinking the Corporate Library Function and Developing High Performance Teams. , 1996 .

[17]  Kathleen M. Carley Organizational Learning and Personnel Turnover , 1992 .

[18]  Sathasivam Mathiyalakan,et al.  A methodology for controlled empirical investigation of membership continuity and change in GDSS groups , 2002, Decis. Support Syst..

[19]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Mental models in design teams: a valid approach to performance in design collaboration? , 2007 .

[20]  R. Ziller,et al.  The newcomer in open and closed groups. , 1961 .

[21]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Emerging Theories of Communication in Organizations , 1991 .

[22]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Advances in Measuring Team Cognition , 2003 .

[23]  Bradley R. Staats,et al.  Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: evidence from indian software services , 2008, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[24]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Simulating the role of transactive memory in group training and performance , 2001 .

[25]  E. McDonough,et al.  An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and colocated new product development teams , 2001 .

[26]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  Managing cross-cultural issues in global software outsourcing , 2004, CACM.

[27]  Kathleen M. Carley On generating hypotheses using computer simulations , 1999 .

[28]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  S. Thompson Social Learning Theory , 2008 .

[30]  Audris Mockus,et al.  Shared Mental Models, Familiarity, and Coordination: A Multi-Method Study of Distributed Software Teams , 2002, ICIS.

[31]  Chris Dede,et al.  Emerging Technologies and Distributed Learning , 1996 .

[32]  R. Ziller,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF OPEN AND CLOSED GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  Robert Axelrod,et al.  Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences , 1997, Complex..

[34]  L. Thompson,et al.  Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity , 2005 .

[35]  T. Allen Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[36]  Kathleen M. Carley Sociology: Computational Organization Theory , 1994 .

[37]  E. Salas,et al.  Team cognition : understanding the factors that drive process and performance , 2004 .

[38]  Robert Axelrod Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences , 1997 .

[39]  R. Hegselmann,et al.  Simulating Social Phenomena , 1997 .

[40]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[41]  Chris Dede,et al.  The evolution of distance education: Emerging technologies and distributed learning , 1996 .

[42]  R. Moreland Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. , 1999 .

[43]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  Community Knowledge Sharing in Practice: The Eureka Story , 2002 .

[44]  A. Mckinlay,et al.  Managing in the creative industries: Managing the motley crew , 2009 .

[45]  J. Stevenson The cultural origins of human cognition , 2001 .

[46]  Janice Langan-Fox,et al.  Mental models, team mental models, and performance: Process, development, and future directions , 2004 .

[47]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Coordination of Information Technology Management: Team-Based Structures and Computer-based Communication Systems , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[48]  Nigel Gilbert,et al.  Agent-based social simulation: dealing with complexity , 2005 .

[49]  Organizations , 1992, Restoration & Management Notes.

[50]  D. Wegner Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[51]  Thomas J. Conlon,et al.  A review of informal learning literature, theory and implications for practice in developing global professional competence , 2004 .

[52]  Yuqing Ren Simulating the Role of Transactive Memory in Group Performance , 2001 .

[53]  Bryan Smith Computer–Mediated Negotiated Interaction: An Expanded Model , 2003 .

[54]  Anders Söderholm,et al.  A theory of the temporary organization , 1995 .

[55]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  Organizational Differences in Rates of Learning: Evidence from the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[56]  A. Edmondson Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[57]  J. McGrath,et al.  TIME MATTERS IN TEAM PERFORMANCE: EFFECTS OF MEMBER FAMILIARITY, ENTRAINMENT, AND TASK DISCONTINUITY ON SPEED AND QUALITY , 2003 .

[58]  The effects of personnel replacement on an information-processing crew. , 1961 .

[59]  J. Mathieu,et al.  Investigating linear and interactive effects of shared mental models on safety and efficiency in a field setting. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[60]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Agent-based computational models and generative social science , 1999, Complex..

[61]  R. Katz The Effects of Group Longevity on Project Communication and Performance. , 1982 .

[62]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  The Contingent Effects of Transactive Memory: When Is It More Beneficial to Know What Others Know? , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[63]  R. Golembiewski Handbook of Organizational Behavior , 2001 .

[64]  Bradley R. Staats,et al.  Fluid Tasks and Fluid Teams: The Impact of Diversity in Experience and Team Familiarity on Team Performance , 2011, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[65]  John H. Miller,et al.  Communication and coordination , 2004, Complex..

[66]  Adam M. Kleinbaum,et al.  Communication (and Coordination?) in a Modern, Complex Organization , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[67]  Kyle Lewis Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.