Accurate Regression-based 4D Mitral Valve Segmentation from 2D MRI Slices

Cardiac MR (CMR) imaging is increasingly accepted as the gold standard for the evaluation of cardiac anatomy, function and mass. The multi-plan ability of CMR makes it a well suited modality for evaluation of the complex anatomy of the mitral valve (MV). However, the 2D slice-based acquisition paradigm of CMR limits the 4D capabilities for precise and accurate morphological and pathological analysis due to long through-put times and protracted study. In this paper we propose a new CMR protocol for acquiring MR images for 4D MV analysis. The proposed protocol is optimized regarding the number and spatial configuration of the 2D CMR slices. Furthermore, we present a learningbased framework for patient-specific 4D MV segmentation from 2D CMR slices (sparse data). The key idea with our Regression-based Surface Reconstruction (RSR) algorithm is the use of available MV models from other imaging modalities (CT, US) to train a dynamic regression model which will then be able to infer the incomplete information pertinent to CMR. Extensive experiments on 200 transesophageal echochardiographic (TEE) US and 20 cardiac CT sequences are performed to train the regression model and to define the CMR acquisition protocol. With the proposed acquisition protocol, stack of 6 parallel long-axis (LA) planes, we acquired CMR patient images and regressed 4D patient-specific MV model with an accuracy of 1.5 ± 0.2 mm and average speed of 1 sec per volume.

[1]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[2]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Three-dimensional modeling for functional analysis of cardiac images, a review , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  J. Friedman Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. , 2001 .

[4]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[5]  Bernard Chazelle,et al.  Shape distributions , 2002, TOGS.

[6]  Geoffrey I. Webb,et al.  MultiBoosting: A Technique for Combining Boosting and Wagging , 2000, Machine Learning.

[7]  Kurt Debl,et al.  Planimetry of mitral valve stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  Zhuowen Tu,et al.  Probabilistic boosting-tree: learning discriminative models for classification, recognition, and clustering , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.

[9]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Image based regression using boosting method , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.

[10]  Xiaoxu Wang,et al.  Reconstruction of Detailed Left Ventricle Motion from tMRI Using Deformable Models , 2007, FIMH.

[11]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Discriminative Joint Context for Automatic Landmark Set Detection from a Single Cardiac MR Long Axis Slice , 2009, FIMH.

[12]  Alberto Redaelli,et al.  Mitral valve modelling in ischemic patients: Finite element analysis from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging , 2010, 2010 Computing in Cardiology.

[13]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Cross-Modality Assessment and Planning for Pulmonary Trunk Treatment Using CT and MRI Imaging , 2010, MICCAI.

[14]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Complete Valvular Heart Apparatus Model from 4D Cardiac CT , 2010, MICCAI.

[15]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Patient-Specific Modeling and Quantification of the Aortic and Mitral Valves From 4-D Cardiac CT and TEE , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.