Exploring the interacting effect of soil texture and bulk density on root system development in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Abstract Knowledge of the responses of root systems in horizoned heterogeneous soil is vital to optimise uptake of water and nutrients to maximise crop productivity. We explored the interacting effects of soil bulk density and texture on the development of root systems in tomato. Two main techniques were employed, X-ray micro-Computed Tomography (μCT), to provide non-destructive, three-dimensional (3D) images of root systems in situ and destructive root washing followed by WinRHIZO® scanning. Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Ailsa Craig plants were grown in soil columns for 10 days to measure the effect of soil compaction on selected root traits. Treatments included bulk density (1.2–1.6 Mg m−3), soil texture (loamy sand and clay loam) and the effects of layering. The effect of bulk density on root growth was greatest 3 days after transplanting (DAT) in both soil types. The effect of soil texture was not apparent at this stage, but was significant at 10 DAT for most root and shoot variables. The influence of bulk density differed between soil types as increasing compaction promoted plant growth in clay loam but retarded root growth in loamy sand. We observed that at 3 DAT root growth is primarily influenced by bulk density but by 10 DAT a switch in the processes regulating root growth occurs and the texture of the soil becomes very influential. Future investigations of root growth must consider soil physical properties individually and at specific time points, as their importance changes as the root system becomes established. Here we have demonstrated both positive and negative impacts across a wide range of bulk density treatments in different soil textures on root growth. This illustrates the importance of understanding the complex nature of root–soil interactions, especially for agricultural practices such as seedbed preparation.

[1]  S. Schmidt.  Root responses to soil physical conditions and the role of root-particle contact , 2011 .

[2]  L. J. Clark,et al.  The effect of soil strength on the yield of wheat , 2008, Plant and Soil.

[3]  R. E. White,et al.  Principles and practice of soil science , 1997 .

[4]  Michael A. Wulder,et al.  Recent rates of forest harvest and conversion in North America , 2011 .

[5]  Jeffrey Lewis,et al.  Optimizing the experimental design of soil columns in saturated and unsaturated transport experiments. , 2010, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[6]  S. Mooney,et al.  Quantifying the effect of soil compaction on three varieties of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using X-ray Micro Computed Tomography (CT) , 2011, Plant and Soil.

[7]  Stefan Mairhofer,et al.  Quantifying the impact of soil compaction on root system architecture in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) by X-ray micro-computed tomography. , 2012, Annals of botany.

[8]  R. Villar,et al.  Linking root traits to plant physiology and growth in Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. seedlings under soil compaction conditions , 2012 .

[9]  N. McLaughlin,et al.  Soil and Crop Response to Varying Levels of Compaction, Nitrogen Fertilization, and Clay Content , 2011 .

[10]  A. Lacointe,et al.  Lipid utilization and carbohydrate partitioning during germination of English walnut (Juglans regia) , 1994 .

[11]  J. Arvidsson.  Nutrient uptake and growth of barley as affected by soil compaction , 1999, Plant and Soil.

[12]  S. Mooney,et al.  Developing X-ray Computed Tomography to non-invasively image 3-D root systems architecture in soil , 2011, Plant and Soil.

[13]  R. Villar,et al.  Moderate soil compaction: Implications on growth and architecture in seedlings of 17 woody plant species , 2009 .

[14]  Sacha J. Mooney,et al.  A morphological approach to understanding preferential flow using image analysis with dye tracers and X-ray Computed Tomography , 2008 .

[15]  Biophysics of the growth responses of pea roots to changes in penetration resistance , 1994, Plant and Soil.

[16]  J. Ecker,et al.  Genetic analysis of ethylene signal transduction in Arabidopsis thaliana: five novel mutant loci integrated into a stress response pathway. , 1995, Genetics.

[17]  A. Hamblin,et al.  The influence of soil structure on water movement, crop root growth, and water uptake , 1986 .

[18]  Stefano Mancuso,et al.  Measuring roots :an updated approach , 2011 .

[19]  D. Or,et al.  Pullout tests of root analogs and natural root bundles in soil: Experiments and modeling , 2011 .

[20]  A. French,et al.  Recovering the dynamics of root growth and development using novel image acquisition and analysis methods , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  M. Shukla,et al.  Principles of Soil Physics , 2004 .

[22]  R. Weil,et al.  Root growth and yield of maize as affected by soil compaction and cover crops , 2011 .

[23]  A. Bengough,et al.  Root elongation of seedling peas through layered soil of different penetration resistances , 1993, Plant and Soil.

[24]  L. A. Bouwman,et al.  Effects of soil compaction on the relationships between nematodes, grass production and soil physical properties , 2000 .

[25]  Thomas C. Kaspar,et al.  Soil compaction and root growth: a review , 1994 .

[26]  Gilles Vercambre,et al.  Soil penetration resistance, a suitable soil property to account for variations in root elongation and branching , 2011, Plant and Soil.

[27]  T. Rufty,et al.  Root penetration through a high bulk density soil layer: differential response of a crop and weed species , 2008, Plant and Soil.

[28]  S. Mooney,et al.  Effect of seedbed cultivation and soil macrostructure on the establishment of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). , 2009 .

[29]  T. Dawson,et al.  The importance of seed reserves for seedling performance: an integrated approach using morphological, physiological, and stable isotope techniques , 2004, Oecologia.

[30]  R. Scott Russell,et al.  Effects of Mechanical Impedance on Root Growth in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) III. OBSERVATIONS ON THE MECHANISM OF RESPONSE , 1980 .

[31]  J. B. Passioura,et al.  Soil structure and plant growth: Impact of bulk density and biopores , 1996, Plant and Soil.

[32]  G. Spoor,et al.  Effects of soil compaction and mechanical damage at harvest on growth and biomass production of short rotation coppice willow , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[33]  François Tardieu,et al.  Growth and functioning of roots and of root systems subjected to soil compaction. Towards a system with multiple signalling , 1994 .

[34]  W. R. Whalley,et al.  Biological effects of soil compaction , 1995 .

[35]  M. Crespi,et al.  Plant root growth, architecture and function , 2009, Plant and Soil.

[36]  D. Mcgarry,et al.  A comparison between continuous and controlled grazing on a red duplex soil. I. Effects on soil physical characteristics , 1995 .

[37]  T. Hura,et al.  Changes in root system structure, leaf water potential and gas exchange of maize and triticale seedlings affected by soil compaction , 2013 .

[38]  W. R. Whalley,et al.  Predicting Penetrometer Resistance from the Compression Characteristic of Soil , 2012 .

[39]  D. Rowell.  Soil science: methods and applications. , 1994 .

[40]  W. Anderson,et al.  Soil compaction in cropping systems: A review of the nature, causes and possible solutions , 2005 .

[41]  D. C. McKenzie,et al.  Soil compaction: identification directly in the field , 2006 .

[42]  N. Anten,et al.  Soil compaction effects on growth and root traits of tobacco depend on light, water regime and mechanical stress , 2012 .

[43]  E. Crompton.  SOME MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES ASSOCIATED WITH POOR SOIL DRAINAGE , 1952 .

[44]  J. Lynch,et al.  New roots for agriculture: exploiting the root phenome , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.