Game-Theoretic Analysis of bankruptcy and taxation Problems: Recent Advances

A group of agents have claims on a resource, but there is not enough of the resource to honor all of the claims. How should it be divided? We survey the recent game theoretic approaches that have been followed in solving such "claims problems".

[1]  W. Thomson,et al.  Bargaining problems with claims , 1992 .

[2]  R. Aumann,et al.  Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud , 1985 .

[3]  Barry O'Neill,et al.  A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud , 1982, Math. Soc. Sci..

[4]  William Thomson,et al.  Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey , 2003, Math. Soc. Sci..

[5]  José Alcalde,et al.  Bankruptcy games and the Ibn Ezra’s proposal , 2005 .

[6]  Josep E. Peris,et al.  Mediation in claims problems , 2014 .

[7]  Federico Valenciano,et al.  The Bilateral Consistent Prekernel, the Core, and NTU Bankruptcy Problems , 2003, Math. Oper. Res..

[8]  P. Jean-Jacques Herings,et al.  Transferable Utility Games with Uncertainty , 2011, J. Econ. Theory.

[9]  Peter Borm,et al.  A Geometric Characterisation of the Compromise Value , 2003 .

[10]  Carmen Herrero,et al.  The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems , 2001, Math. Soc. Sci..

[11]  S. Hart,et al.  Potential, value, and consistency , 1989 .

[12]  Silviu Guiasu.  Three ancient problems solved by using the game theory logic based on the Shapley value , 2010, Synthese.

[13]  G. Owen,et al.  A Simple Expression for the Shapley Value in a Special Case , 1973 .

[14]  William Thomson,et al.  A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims , 2013, Games Econ. Behav..

[15]  Dénes Pálvölgyi,et al.  A strategic approach to estate division problems with non-homogenous preferences , 2010 .

[16]  H. Peyton Young,et al.  On Dividing an Amount According to Individual Claims or Liabilities , 1987, Math. Oper. Res..

[17]  Nir Dagan,et al.  Bilateral comparisons and consistent fair division rules in the context of bankruptcy problems , 1997 .

[18]  Chih Chang,et al.  A non-cooperative interpretation of the f-just rules of bankruptcy problems , 2008, Games Econ. Behav..

[19]  D. Schmeidler.  The Nucleolus of a Characteristic Function Game , 1969 .

[20]  Bas van Velzen,et al.  The core cover in relation to the nucleolus and the Weber set , 2005, Int. J. Game Theory.

[21]  Hans Peters,et al.  Non-cooperative solutions for estate division problems , 2011, Games Econ. Behav..

[22]  R. Branzei,et al.  Shapley-like values for interval bankruptcy games , 2003 .

[23]  A. Villar,et al.  A Non-cooperative Approach to Bankruptcy Problems , 2006 .

[24]  L. S. Shapley,et al.  17. A Value for n-Person Games , 1953 .

[25]  Rodica Branzei,et al.  How To Cope With Division Problems Under Interval Uncertainty Of Claims? , 2004, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[26]  Theo Driessen.  An alternative game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud: the case of the greedy bankruptcy game , 1995 .

[27]  José Manuel Zarzuelo,et al.  The Bilateral Consistent Prekernel for NTU Games , 2000, Games Econ. Behav..

[28]  José Alcalde,et al.  The minimal overlap rule revisited , 2008, Soc. Choice Welf..

[29]  Philip Wolfe,et al.  Contributions to the theory of games , 1953 .

[30]  Jens Leth Hougaard,et al.  Rationing in the presence of baselines , 2013, Soc. Choice Welf..

[31]  M. Josune Albizuri,et al.  Updating claims in bankruptcy problems , 2010, Math. Soc. Sci..

[32]  H. Moulin.  Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods , 2000 .

[33]  Juan Carlos Santos,et al.  The pseudo-average rule: bankruptcy, cost allocation and bargaining , 2011, Math. Methods Oper. Res..

[34]  Peter Borm,et al.  Multi-issue allocation situations , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  W. Thomson.  Consistent Allocation Rules , 1996 .

[36]  Robert J. Aumann.  Some non-superadditive games, and their Shapley values, in the Talmud , 2010, Int. J. Game Theory.

[37]  William Thomson,et al.  On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach , 2007 .

[38]  Peter Borm,et al.  Compromise solutions based on bankruptcy , 2006, Math. Soc. Sci..

[39]  Peter Borm,et al.  The Constrained Equal Awards Rule for Bankruptcy Problems with a Priori Unions , 2005, Ann. Oper. Res..

[40]  W. Thomson,et al.  Constrained Egalitarianism: A New Solution for Claims Problems , 1998 .

[41]  Marek Kaminski,et al.  Parametric rationing methods , 2006, Games Econ. Behav..