Metamemory, distinctiveness, and event-related potentials in recognition memory for faces

A neglected topic in metamemory research is the ability of subjects to predict their own recognition performance for faces. We investigated whether subjects can make such judgments of learning (JOL) for unfamiliar faces and whether JOLs relate to facial distinctiveness, a powerful determinant of face recognition. One group of subjects made JOLs, and a second group rated the same faces for distinctiveness; subsequently, both groups tried to recognize these faces among new faces. There was significant prospective metamemory for faces that appeared to be based on facial distinctiveness. Both prospective metamemory and distinctiveness ratings related to long-lasting effects in event-related brain potentials (ERPs), closely resembling an ERP component that predicted face recognition. Therefore, the brain processes underlying JOLs, distinctiveness, and recognition memory for faces appear to be intimately related.

[1]  Kenneth A. Deffenbacher,et al.  Eyewitness accuracy and confidence , 1980 .

[2]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Principles of spatial analysis , 1987 .

[4]  L. Groninger.  Predicting Recall: The "Feeling-That-I-Will-Know" Phenomenon , 1979 .

[5]  L. Squire.  Memory and Brain , 1987 .

[6]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Accuracy of Feeling-of-Knowing Judgments for Predicting Perceptual Identification and Relearning , 1984 .

[7]  Leo A. Goodman,et al.  Corrigenda: Measures of Association for Cross Classifications , 1957 .

[8]  R. Malpass,et al.  Verbal and visual training in face recognition , 1973 .

[9]  E Winograd,et al.  Elaboration and distinctiveness in memory for faces. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[10]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[11]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  S Hollander,et al.  Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[13]  Ian Begg,et al.  Memory predictions are based on ease of processing , 1989 .

[14]  Ken A. Paller.  ELEKTROPHYSIOLOGISCHE STUDIEN ZUM MENSCHLICHEN GEDACHTNIS , 1993 .

[15]  Eugene B. Zechmeister,et al.  Judgments of knowing: The influence of retrieval practice. , 1980 .

[16]  T. O. Nelson.  Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings , 1990 .

[17]  Hadyn D. Ellis,et al.  Stimulus factors in face learning. , 1988 .

[18]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Typicality and familiarity of faces , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[19]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[20]  B. Underwood.  Individual and group predictions of item difficulty for free learning. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  E. Lovelace.  Metamemory: Monitoring Future Recallability During Study , 1984 .

[22]  W. Sommer,et al.  Human brain potential correlates of face encoding into memory. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions , 1984 .

[24]  D. Perrett,et al.  Time course of neural responses discriminating different views of the face and head. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  M. Kutas.  Review of event-related potential studies of memory. , 1988 .

[26]  M. Kutas,et al.  Neural correlates of encoding in an incidental learning paradigm. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  Edward G. Carmines,et al.  Measurement in the social sciences , 1980 .

[28]  E Donchin,et al.  Effects of mnemonic strategy manipulation in a Von Restorff paradigm. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[29]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Memory performance awareness in younger and older adults. , 1990, Psychology and aging.

[30]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Do different metamemory judgments tap the same underlying aspects of memory , 1990 .

[31]  Lynne M. Reder,et al.  Strategic control of retrieval strategies. , 1988 .

[32]  E. Donchin,et al.  “P300” and memory: Individual differences in the von Restorff effect , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  Gregg T. Vesonder,et al.  On the ability to predict one's own responses while learning , 1985 .

[34]  V. Bruce,et al.  Recognizing familiar faces: the role of distinctiveness and familiarity. , 1986, Canadian journal of psychology.

[35]  V. Bruce,et al.  The Effects of Distinctiveness in Recognising and Classifying Faces , 1986, Perception.

[36]  J. Read,et al.  Effects of Uniqueness, Sex of Subject, and Sex of Photograph on Facial Recognition , 1974 .

[37]  J. R. Vokey,et al.  Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[38]  Is witness confidence helpful in judging eyewitness accuracy , 1988 .

[39]  T. Marill.  Detection theory and psychophysics , 1956 .

[40]  Dana Quade,et al.  Nonparametric Partial Correlation , 1967 .

[41]  Lola L. Cuddy,et al.  Discrimination of item strength at time of presentation , 1969 .

[42]  L. Reder.  Strategy selection in question answering , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[43]  Michelle E. Cohen,et al.  Facial recognition and the von Restorff effect , 1975 .

[44]  Hadyn D. Ellis,et al.  Identification evidence : a psychological evaluation , 1983 .

[45]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Measures of association for cross classifications , 1979 .

[46]  R. Johnson,et al.  On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential. , 2007, Psychophysiology.