Transcription reinitiation rate: a special role for the TATA box

Promoters need to specify both the timing of transcriptional induction and the amount of transcript synthesized. In order to explore each of these effects separately, in vitro assays for the level of active preinitiation complex formation and for the rate of continuous RNA production were done. The effects were found to be influenced differently by different promoter elements. A consensus TATA element had a very strong effect on the rate of continuous RNA production, whereas two types of activators were important primarily in forming active transcription preinitiation complexes. Consensus TATA promoters exhibited high rates of continuous transcription; they assembled active preinitiation transcription complexes slowly but then produced transcripts continuously at an approximately fivefold-higher rate. Initiator-containing TATA-less promoters produced continuous transcripts slowly. Point mutations in the TATA element led to lower levels of transcription by reducing the number of preinitiation complexes and amplifying this reduction by lowering the apparent reinitiation rate. The results allow understanding of the sequence diversity of promoter elements in terms of specifying separate controls over the sensitivity of gene induction and over the strength of the induced promoter.

[1]  R. Conaway,et al.  Transcription : mechanisms and regulation , 1994 .

[2]  D. K. Hawley,et al.  Functional steps in transcription initiation and reinitiation from the major late promoter in a HeLa nuclear extract. , 1987, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[3]  P. Farnham,et al.  Transcriptional regulation of the dihydrofolate reductase gene , 1996, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[4]  Michael R. Green,et al.  A role for activator-mediated TFIIB recruitment in diverse aspects of transcriptional regulation , 1995, Current Biology.

[5]  R. Roeder,et al.  Stability of transcription complexes on class II genes , 1989, Molecular and cellular biology.

[6]  R. S. Williams,et al.  Functional heterogeneity of mammalian TATA-box sequences revealed by interaction with a cell-specific enhancer , 1990, Nature.

[7]  Andrew J. Bannister,et al.  c-Fos-induced activation of a TATA-box-containing promoter involves direct contact with TATA-box-binding protein , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[8]  J. T. Kadonaga.  Assembly and disassembly of the Drosophila RNA polymerase II complex during transcription. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[9]  G. Prendergast,et al.  c‐Myc represses transcription in vivo by a novel mechanism dependent on the initiator element and Myc box II. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[10]  D. Baltimore,et al.  Transcriptional activation by Sp1 as directed through TATA or initiator: specific requirement for mammalian transcription factor IID. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  M. Carey,et al.  The role of activators in assembly of RNA polymerase II transcription complexes. , 1994, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[12]  P. Chambon,et al.  The acidic transcriptional activator GAL‐VP16 acts on preformed template‐committed complexes. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[13]  J. Azizkhan,et al.  Transcription from TATA-less promoters: dihydrofolate reductase as a model. , 1993, Critical reviews in eukaryotic gene expression.

[14]  K. Struhl,et al.  Chromatin Structure and RNA Polymerase II Connection: Implications for Transcription , 1996, Cell.

[15]  J. Gralla,et al.  Uncoupling of initiation and reinitiation rates during HeLa RNA polymerase II transcription in vitro , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[16]  Gail Mandel,et al.  REST: A mammalian silencer protein that restricts sodium channel gene expression to neurons , 1995, Cell.

[17]  M. Groudine,et al.  Enhancers increase the probability but not the level of gene expression. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  A. O'Shea-Greenfield,et al.  Similar mechanisms for transcription initiation mediated through a TATA box or an initiator element. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[19]  J. Gralla,et al.  The acidic activator GAL4-AH can stimulate polymerase II transcription by promoting assembly of a closed complex requiring TFIID and TFIIA. , 1992, Genes & development.

[20]  R. Hipskind,et al.  Analysis of transcriptional stimulation by recombinant Oct proteins in a cell-free system. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[21]  R. Conaway,et al.  Role of core promoter structure in assembly of the RNA polymerase II preinitiation complex. A common pathway for formation of preinitiation intermediates at many TATA and TATA-less promoters. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[22]  G. Zambetti,et al.  Wild-type p53 binds to the TATA-binding protein and represses transcription. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  J. Pipas,et al.  Specific repression of TATA-mediated but not initiator-mediated transcription by wild-type p53 , 1993, Nature.

[24]  C. Benoist,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies to NF‐Y define its function in MHC class II and albumin gene transcription. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[25]  C. Verrijzer,et al.  CIF, an essential cofactor for TFIID-dependent initiator function. , 1996, Genes & development.

[26]  K. Struhl,et al.  Mutations on the DNA-binding surface of TATA-binding protein can specifically impair the response to acidic activators in vivo , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[27]  R. Tjian,et al.  Contacts in Context: Promoter Specificity and Macromolecular Interactions in Transcription , 1996, Cell.

[28]  D. K. Hawley,et al.  DNA bending is an important component of site-specific recognition by the TATA binding protein. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  A. Sentenac,et al.  Facilitated Recycling Pathway for RNA Polymerase III , 1996, Cell.

[30]  S. Smale,et al.  Core promoter specificities of the Sp1 and VP16 transcriptional activation domains , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[31]  D. Baltimore,et al.  The “initiator” as a transcription control element , 1989, Cell.

[32]  D. Reinberg,et al.  Recycling of the general transcription factors during RNA polymerase II transcription. , 1995, Genes & development.

[33]  D. Reinberg,et al.  Oct‐2 facilitates functional preinitiation complex assembly and is continuously required at the promoter for multiple rounds of transcription. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[34]  P. Farnham,et al.  In vitro transcription and delimitation of promoter elements of the murine dihydrofolate reductase gene , 1986, Molecular and cellular biology.

[35]  L. Lania,et al.  Krüppel-associated box-mediated repression of RNA polymerase II promoters is influenced by the arrangement of basal promoter elements. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  M. O'Reilly,et al.  The terminal balls characteristic of eukaryotic rRNA transcription units in chromatin spreads are rRNA processing complexes. , 1993, Genes & development.

[37]  B Sollner-Webb,et al.  Metazoan rDNA enhancer acts by making more genes transcriptionally active , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[38]  E. Geiduschek,et al.  S. cerevisiae TFIIIB is the transcription initiation factor proper of RNA polymerase III, while TFIIIA and TFIIIC are assembly factors , 1990, Cell.

[39]  M. Krasnow,et al.  Dif ! erential regulation of transcription premmatlon complex assembly by activator and repressor homeo domain proteins , 2007 .