Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.

PURPOSE To investigate the interactions of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in a three-dimensional finite element implant/jawbone system and to determine the influence of the loading angle on stress/strain fields while varying the implant diameter and insertion depth. MATERIALS AND METHODS Four finite element models were created, which corresponded to two implant diameters and two insertion depths. The jawbone was composed of cortical and cancellous bone and modeled as a linearly elastic medium; the implant had a detailed screw structure and was modeled as an elastic-plastic medium. Static loading was applied to the coronal surface of the implant with a maximum load of 200 N for all the models. Loading directions were varied, with buccolingually applied loading angles ranging from 0 to 85 degrees. RESULTS Increases in the angle of force application caused not only increased maximum stress/strain values but worsened stress/strain distribution patterns in the bone and implant. The maximum stress in the bone always occurred at the upper edge of the cortical bone on the lingual side adjacent to the implant. The use of a larger-diameter implant or an increased insertion depth significantly reduced the maximum stress/strain values, improved the stress/strain distribution patterns and, in particular, decreased the stress/strain sensitivity to loading angle. CONCLUSIONS A narrow-diameter implant, when inserted into jawbone with a shallow insertion depth and loaded with an oblique loading angle, is most unfavorable for stress distribution in both bone and implant. An optimized design of the neck region of an implant, in combination with a carefully controlled implant insertion depth that sets the threads of the implant neck well below the upper edge of the cortical bone, should be especially effective in improving the biomechanical environment for the maintenance of bone in implant/bone systems.

[1]  I Naert,et al.  The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[2]  F. Isidor,et al.  Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[3]  D van Steenberghe,et al.  A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part II: Prosthetic aspects. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  H. Frost,et al.  Perspectives: bone's mechanical usage windows. , 1992, Bone and mineral.

[5]  M. Esposito,et al.  Histopathologic observations on late oral implant failures. , 2000, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[6]  H. Haanaes,et al.  A comparative clinical study of three different endosseous implants in edentulous mandibles. , 1998, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[7]  Michel Barquins,et al.  Two dental implants designed for immediate loading: a finite element analysis. , 2002, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[8]  J. Kuiper,et al.  Stress distribution around dental implants: influence of superstructure, length of implants, and height of mandible. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  J. Wolff Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen , 1893 .

[10]  M R Rieger,et al.  Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants. , 1990, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[11]  T Jemt,et al.  Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Brånemark dental implants: a study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. , 1991, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[12]  James Laney Williams,et al.  Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis. , 2005, Clinical oral implants research.

[13]  Kazuo Arakawa,et al.  Visualizing Displacement and Deformation Behavior of the Periodontium under Dental Occlusion Using a Digital Image Correlation Method , 2007 .

[14]  Ibbott Cg In vivo fracture of a basket-type osseointegrating dental implant: a case report. , 1989 .

[15]  F. Isidor,et al.  Histological evaluation of peri-implant bone at implants subjected to occlusal overload or plaque accumulation. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[16]  R. Jaffin,et al.  The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. , 1991, Journal of periodontology.

[17]  L Sennerby,et al.  A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. , 1992, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[18]  R Pilo,et al.  The influence of abutment angulation on strains and stresses along the implant/bone interface: comparison between two experimental techniques. , 1998, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[19]  D van Steenberghe,et al.  Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark system. , 1992, Clinical oral implants research.

[20]  Hiroshi Fukuda,et al.  Finite element analysis of the influence of implant inclination, loading position, and load direction on stress distribution , 2003, Odontology.

[21]  P I Brånemark,et al.  A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. , 1981, International journal of oral surgery.

[22]  F. Bosman,et al.  A three-dimensional, finite-element analysis of bone around dental implants in an edentulous human mandible. , 1993, Archives of oral biology.

[23]  P. Branemark,et al.  Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. , 1990, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[24]  A. Kirsch,et al.  The IMZ endosseous two phase implant system: a complete oral rehabilitation treatment concept. , 1986, The Journal of oral implantology.

[25]  U. Joos,et al.  Experimental and finite element study of a human mandible. , 2000, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[26]  T Jemt,et al.  Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: a preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures. , 1989, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[27]  Kitetsu Shin,et al.  The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue. part 4: a histologic study in monkeys. , 1998, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[28]  Weinberg La,et al.  The biomechanics of force distribution in implant-supported prostheses. , 1993 .

[29]  F. Bosman,et al.  A comparison of three finite element models of an edentulous mandible provided with implants. , 1993, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[30]  F Guilak,et al.  Differentiation of the Bone-Tissue Remodeling Response to Axial and Torsional Loading in the Turkey Ulna*† , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  Fehmi Erzincanlı,et al.  Static, dynamic and fatigue behaviors of dental implant using finite element method , 2006, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[32]  S E Eckert,et al.  Validation of dental implant systems through a review of literature supplied by system manufacturers. , 1997, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[33]  H. Frost Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 2. Redefining Wolff's Law: The remodeling problem , 1990, The Anatomical record.

[34]  W C Van Buskirk,et al.  Modeling the biomechanics of the mandible: a three-dimensional finite element study. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.