Mixed-reality learning environments: Integrating mobile interfaces with laboratory test-beds

Even as mobile devices have become increasingly powerful and popular among learners and instructors alike, research involving their comprehensive integration into educational laboratory activities remains largely unexplored. This paper discusses efforts to integrate vision-based measurement and control, augmented reality (AR), and multi-touch interaction on mobile devices in the development of Mixed-Reality Learning Environments (MRLE) that enhance interactions with laboratory test-beds for science and engineering education. A learner points her device at a laboratory test-bed fitted with visual markers while a mobile application supplies a live view of the experiment augmented with interactive media that aid in the visualization of concepts and promote learner engagement. As the learner manipulates the augmented media, her gestures are mapped to commands that alter the behavior of the test-bed on the fly. Running in the background of the mobile application are algorithms performing vision-based estimation and wireless control of the test-bed. In this way, the sensing, storage, computation, and communication (SSCC) capabilities of mobile devices are leveraged to relieve the need for laboratory-grade equipment, improving the cost-effectiveness and portability of platforms to conduct hands-on laboratories. We hypothesize that students using the MRLE platform demonstrate improvement in their knowledge of dynamic systems and control concepts and have generally favorable experiences using the platform. To validate the hypotheses concerning the educational effectiveness and user experience of the MRLEs, an evaluation was conducted with two classes of undergraduate students using an illustrative platform incorporating a tablet computer and motor test-bed to teach concepts of dynamic systems and control. Results of the evaluation validate the hypotheses. The benefits and drawbacks of the MRLEs observed throughout the study are discussed with respect to the traditional hands-on, virtual, and remote laboratory formats. Mobile devices and test-beds can be integrated according to a novel lab education paradigm.Vision-based measurement and control, AR, and touchscreen enhance lab interactions.The proposed paradigm can offer the benefits of hands-on, virtual, and remote labs.An implementation is developed using an iPad and a motor test-bed to teach control.Evaluation with students validates the implementation's educational effectiveness.

[1]  Jeff Sauro,et al.  Quantifying the User Experience: Practical Statistics for User Research , 2012 .

[2]  Andreas Müller,et al.  Classical experiments revisited: smartphones and tablet PCs as experimental tools in acoustics and optics , 2014 .

[3]  Xinhua Zhuang,et al.  Pose estimation from corresponding point data , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[4]  Jochen Kuhn,et al.  Analyzing radial acceleration with a smartphone acceleration sensor , 2013 .

[5]  LeMai Nguyen,et al.  iPads in higher education - Hype and hope , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[6]  James R. Lewis,et al.  Psychometric Evaluation of the PSSUQ Using Data from Five Years of Usability Studies , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[7]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review , 2006, CSUR.

[8]  Paul B. Hounshell,et al.  Using three-dimensional models to teach molecular structures in high school chemistry , 1995 .

[9]  Vikram Kapila,et al.  Interactive mobile interface with augmented reality for learning digital control concepts , 2016, 2016 Indian Control Conference (ICC).

[10]  Willian Rochadel,et al.  Application of remote experiments in basic education through mobile devices , 2014, 2014 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).

[11]  Mariano Alcañiz Raya,et al.  Evaluating the Usability of an Augmented Reality Based Educational Application , 2010, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[12]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality , 2003, Comput. Graph..

[13]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  Process and learning outcomes from remotely-operated, simulated, and hands-on student laboratories , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Rosemary Luckin,et al.  “Making it real”: exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science , 2006, Virtual Reality.

[15]  Tiffany L. Hesser,et al.  iPads in the Science Laboratory: Experience in Designing and Implementing a Paperless Chemistry Laboratory Course , 2013 .

[16]  Takami Yasuda,et al.  Lunar Observation Support System Using Smartphone AR for Astronomy Education , 2014, Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol..

[17]  D. May,et al.  Using E-Portfolios to support experiential learning and open the use of tele-operated laboratories for mobile devices , 2012, 2012 9th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV).

[18]  Chih-Wei Chang,et al.  Improving the authentic learning experience by integrating robots into the mixed-reality environment , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy,et al.  Work in progress: Performing signal analysis laboratories using Android devices , 2012, 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings.

[20]  Harry E. Pence,et al.  Smart Phones, a Powerful Tool in the Chemistry Classroom. , 2011 .

[21]  Vikram Kapila,et al.  Development of Mobile Interfaces to Interact with Automatic Control Experiments [Focus on Education] , 2014, IEEE Control Systems.

[22]  Jochen Kuhn,et al.  Video analysis of projectile motion using tablet computers as experimental tools , 2014 .

[23]  Vikram Kapila,et al.  Using tablets in the vision-based control of a ball and beam test-bed , 2015, 2015 12th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (ICINCO).

[24]  Pablo Orduna,et al.  Enabling mobile access to Remote Laboratories , 2011, 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).

[25]  Patrick Maier,et al.  Augmented Reality for teaching spatial relations , 2009 .

[26]  Vikram Kapila,et al.  Towards teleoperation-based interactive learning of robot kinematics using a mobile augmented reality interface on a tablet , 2016, 2016 Indian Control Conference (ICC).

[27]  Andreas Spanias,et al.  Interactive DSP laboratories on mobile phones and tablets , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[28]  Jochen Kuhn,et al.  Applications and Examples of Experiments with Mobile Phones and Smartphones in Physics Lessons , 2013 .

[29]  Albert J. Rosa,et al.  The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education , 2005 .

[30]  Tobias Bjerregaard,et al.  A survey of research and practices of Network-on-chip , 2006, CSUR.

[31]  Vilson Gruber,et al.  Mobile remote experimentation applied to education , 2013 .

[32]  Martin White,et al.  Web3D and Augmented Reality to support engineering education , 2004 .

[33]  Ananda Maiti,et al.  Different Platforms for Remote Laboratories in Mobile Devices , 2012 .

[34]  Cecil R. Reynolds,et al.  Measurement and Assessment in Education , 2005 .

[35]  Emiliano Miluzzo,et al.  A survey of mobile phone sensing , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[36]  Jochen Kuhn,et al.  iRadioactivity — Possibilities and Limitations for Using Smartphones and Tablet PCs as Radioactive Counters , 2014 .