Change detection and occlusion modes in road-traffic scenarios

Abstract Change blindness phenomena are widely known in cognitive science, but their relation to driving is not quite clear. We report a study where subjects viewed colour video stills of natural traffic while eye movements were recorded. A change could occur randomly in three different occlusion modes—blinks, blanks and saccades—or during a fixation (as control condition). These changes could be either relevant or irrelevant with respect to the traffic safety. We used deletions as well as insertions of objects. All occlusion modes were equivalent concerning detection rate and reaction time, deviating from the control condition only. The detection of relevant changes was both more likely and faster than that of irrelevant ones, particularly for relevant insertions, which approached the base line level. Even in this case, it took about 180 ms longer to react to changes when they occurred during a saccade, blink or blank. In a second study, relevant insertions and the blank occlusion were used in a driving simulator environment. We found a surprising effect in the dynamic setting: an advantage in change detection rate and time with blanks compared to the control condition. Change detection was also good during blinks, but not in saccades. Possible explanation of these effects and their practical implications are discussed.

[1]  W N Dember,et al.  Backward Enhancement? , 1972, Science.

[2]  G. Barbato,et al.  Diurnal variation in spontaneous eye-blink rate , 2000, Psychiatry Research.

[3]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[4]  S. Werner,et al.  Is "Change Blindness" Attenuated by Domain-specific Expertise? An Expert-Novices Comparison of Change Detection in Football Images , 2000 .

[5]  G. Brelstaff,et al.  Is the Richness of Our Visual World an Illusion? Transsaccadic Memory for Complex Scenes , 1995, Perception.

[6]  J. Grimes On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. , 1996 .

[7]  D. Simons,et al.  Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures , 1997 .

[8]  G. Wallis,et al.  What's Scene and Not Seen: Influences of Movement and Task Upon What We See , 2000 .

[9]  Y Nagayama ROLE OF VISUAL PERCEPTION IN DRIVING , 1978 .

[10]  D. Simons,et al.  CHAPTER 13 – Change Blindness , 2005 .

[11]  S. M. Dornhoefer,et al.  Blinks, blanks and saccades: how blind we really are for relevant visual events. , 2002, Progress in brain research.

[12]  N. Charness,et al.  Visual Span in Expert Chess Players: Evidence From Eye Movements , 2001, Psychological science.

[13]  D. Simons In Sight, Out of Mind: When Object Representations Fail , 1996 .

[14]  D. Simons,et al.  Change Blindness in the Absence of a Visual Disruption , 2000, Perception.

[15]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  Flicker distorts visual space constancy , 1991, Vision Research.

[16]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Picture Changes During Blinks: Looking Without Seeing and Seeing Without Looking , 2000 .

[17]  Lew B. Stelmach,et al.  Detection of stimulus change: The hypothetical roles of visual transient responses , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  Jun Saiki,et al.  Multiple-object permanence tracking: limitation in maintenance and transformation of perceptual objects. , 2002, Progress in brain research.

[19]  D. Simons,et al.  Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction , 1998 .

[20]  M. Hayhoe,et al.  What controls attention in natural environments? , 2001, Vision Research.

[21]  D. Schroeder,et al.  Blink Rate: A Possible Measure of Fatigue , 1994, Human factors.

[22]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Change-blindness as a result of ‘mudsplashes’ , 1999, Nature.