Mobility-as-A-Service (Maas): A Latent Class Cluster Analysis to Identify Dutch Vehicle Owners’ Use Intention

[1]  Goran Smith,et al.  Adopting Mobility-as-a-Service: An empirical analysis of end-users’ experiences , 2022, Travel Behaviour and Society.

[2]  O. Přibyl,et al.  Understanding the potential of MaaS – An European survey on attitudes , 2022, Travel Behaviour and Society.

[3]  Elena Alyavina,et al.  Mobility as a service (MaaS): A thematic map of challenges and opportunities , 2022, Research in Transportation Business & Management.

[4]  Sourabh Jain,et al.  What drives adoption intention of electric vehicles in India? An integrated UTAUT model with environmental concerns, perceived risk and government support , 2021, Research in Transportation Business & Management.

[5]  A. Polydoropoulou,et al.  MaaS users: Who they are and how much they are willing-to-pay , 2021 .

[6]  Tan Yigitcanlar,et al.  Barriers and risks of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) adoption in cities: A systematic review of the literature , 2020 .

[7]  Mi Gan,et al.  Public Acceptance of Driverless Buses in China: An Empirical Analysis Based on an Extended UTAUT Model , 2020, Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society.

[8]  Isabella Soscia,et al.  Mobility as a Service: An Exploratory Study of Consumer Mobility Behaviour , 2020, Sustainability.

[9]  S. Hoogendoorn-Lanser,et al.  Early adopters of Mobility-as-a-Service in the Netherlands , 2020, Transport Policy.

[10]  A. Polydoropoulou,et al.  Ready for Mobility as a Service? Insights from stakeholders and end-users , 2020 .

[11]  James B. Schreiber.  Issues and recommendations for exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis. , 2020, Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP.

[12]  B. Wee,et al.  Factors influencing the acceptance and use of a bicycle sharing system: Applying an extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) , 2020, Case Studies on Transport Policy.

[13]  Jiaqi Zheng,et al.  A study on users' willingness to accept mobility as a service based on UTAUT model , 2020 .

[14]  Elena Alyavina,et al.  Mobility as a service and sustainable travel behaviour: A thematic analysis study , 2020 .

[15]  H. Timmermans,et al.  Does MaaS contribute to sustainable transportation? A mode choice perspective , 2020 .

[16]  Timo Liljamo,et al.  People’s current mobility costs and willingness to pay for Mobility as a Service offerings , 2020 .

[17]  A. Patt,et al.  What are the factors and needs promoting mobility-as-a-service? Findings from the Swiss Household Energy Demand Survey (SHEDS) , 2020 .

[18]  R. Palacin,et al.  Children, Young people and Mobility as a Service: Opportunities and barriers for future mobility , 2020 .

[19]  Hager Khechine,et al.  The adoption of a social learning system: Intrinsic value in the UTAUT model , 2020, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[20]  S. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Drivers and barriers in adopting Mobility as a Service (MaaS) – A latent class cluster analysis of attitudes , 2020, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[21]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  Bundling, pricing schemes and extra features preferences for mobility as a service: Sequential portfolio choice experiment , 2020, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[22]  Jean-Paul Van Belle,et al.  Customer Intentions Towards Autonomous Vehicles in South Africa: An Extended UTAUT Model , 2020, 2020 10th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence).

[23]  Roberta Guglielmetti Mugion,et al.  Shared mobility as a driver for sustainable consumptions: The intention to re-use free-floating car sharing , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[24]  Kees Maat,et al.  Impacts of the built environment and travel behaviour on attitudes: Theories underpinning the reverse causality hypothesis , 2019, Journal of Transport Geography.

[25]  M. Kamargianni,et al.  The potential of mobility as a service bundles as a mobility management tool , 2019 .

[26]  Cheng-Min Chao,et al.  Factors Determining the Behavioral Intention to Use Mobile Learning: An Application and Extension of the UTAUT Model , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[27]  S. Guhathakurta,et al.  Are millennials more multimodal? A latent-class cluster analysis with attitudes and preferences among millennial and Generation X commuters in California , 2019, Transportation.

[28]  Xiaoduan Sun,et al.  Pedestrian crash analysis with latent class clustering method. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Daniel Hanss,et al.  Car Sharers’ Interest in Integrated Multimodal Mobility Platforms: A Diffusion of Innovations Perspective , 2018, Sustainability.

[30]  A. Y. Choi,et al.  Ten Frequently Asked Questions About Latent Class Analysis , 2018, Translational Issues in Psychological Science.

[31]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Potential uptake and willingness-to-pay for Mobility as a Service (MaaS): A stated choice study , 2018, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[32]  Jiangang Fei,et al.  Use of exploratory factor analysis in maritime research , 2018, The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics.

[33]  Markus Pöllänen,et al.  Review on mobility as a service in scientific publications , 2018, Research in Transportation Business & Management.

[34]  A. Vij,et al.  Normative beliefs and modality styles: a latent class and latent variable model of travel behaviour , 2018 .

[35]  Natasha Merat,et al.  What influences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of automated road transport systems , 2017 .

[36]  Jishnu Narayan,et al.  Mobility as a Service: A Critical Review of Definitions, Assessments of Schemes, and Key Challenges , 2017 .

[37]  C. Mulley.  Mobility as a Services (MaaS) – does it have critical mass? , 2017 .

[38]  Frank Witlox,et al.  Travel mode choice and travel satisfaction: bridging the gap between decision utility and experienced utility , 2016 .

[39]  Hamed Taherdoost.  Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument; How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire/Survey in a Research , 2016 .

[40]  M. Kroesen,et al.  Revealing heterogeneity in air travelers' responses to passenger-oriented environmental policies: A discrete-choice latent class model , 2016 .

[41]  Matt C. Howard.  A Review of Exploratory Factor Analysis Decisions and Overview of Current Practices: What We Are Doing and How Can We Improve? , 2016, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[42]  Monica Menendez,et al.  Exploring the application of latent class cluster analysis for investigating pedestrian crash injury severities in Switzerland. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[43]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[44]  C. Distefano,et al.  Understanding and Using Factor Scores: Considerations for the Applied Researcher , 2009 .

[45]  S. Haustein,et al.  Psychological, sociodemographic, and infrastructural factors as determinants of ecological impact caused by mobility behavior , 2007 .

[46]  J. Osborne,et al.  Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. , 2005 .

[47]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[48]  H. Kaiser,et al.  Little Jiffy, Mark Iv , 1974 .

[49]  F. Witlox,et al.  Limitations to the car-substitution effect of MaaS. Findings from a Belgian pilot study , 2020 .

[50]  M. Kowald,et al.  Exploring motivational mechanisms behind the intention to adopt mobility as a service (MaaS): Insights from Germany , 2020 .

[51]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Acceptance of Automated Road Transport Systems (ARTS): An adaptation of the UTAUT model , 2016 .

[52]  Eric Molin,et al.  Multimodal travel groups and attitudes: A latent class cluster analysis of Dutch travelers , 2016 .