Using Tasks and Semi-structured Messages to Support Decision Follow Up

This paper describes the design and implementation of a coordination mechanism to support follow up of decisions made in meetings, using task management and semi-structured messages in an integrated way. Two questions lead our research: i) can a set of group support mechanisms, enabling the link between pre-meeting, meeting and post-meeting activities, allow for better coordination of decisions being implemented?; ii) can electronic elements, which belong to daily project scenarios, provide awareness of decision implementation's problems? Our evaluations and conclusions indicate that such elements (ie. tasks and emails) provide means for coordination of decision follow up

[1]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Andreas Girgensohn,et al.  LiteMinutes: an Internet-based system for multimedia meeting minutes , 2001, WWW '01.

[3]  Ana Cristina Bicharra Garcia,et al.  Cutting to the chase: improving meeting effectiveness by focusing on the agenda , 2004, CSCW.

[4]  Harry Chen,et al.  Intelligent Agents Meet the Semantic Web in Smart Spaces , 2004, IEEE Internet Comput..

[5]  Wolfgang Appelt,et al.  WWW Based Collaboration with the BSCW System , 1999, SOFSEM.

[6]  José A. Pino,et al.  Key issues in the design of an asynchronous system to support meeting preparation , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[7]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  Beyond the chalkboard: computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings , 1988, CACM.

[8]  Gitesh K. Raikundalia,et al.  A Web tool for asynchronous, collaborative development of electronic meeting agendas , 1998, Proceedings. 3rd Asia Pacific Computer Human Interaction (Cat. No.98EX110).

[9]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  Email task management styles: the cleaners and the keepers , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[10]  Gloria Mark,et al.  Shaping technology across social worlds: groupware adoption in a distributed organization , 2003, GROUP.

[11]  José A. Pino,et al.  Support for decision implementation and follow-up , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Successful application of communication techniques to improve the systems development process , 1989, Inf. Manag..

[13]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The interdisciplinary study of coordination , 1994, CSUR.

[14]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[15]  Stephen C. Hayne,et al.  The facilitators perspective on meetings and implications for group support systems design , 1999, DATB.

[16]  Marcos R. S. Borges,et al.  Generation of group storytelling in post-decision implementation process , 2002, The 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design.

[17]  Nicole Yankelovich,et al.  Meeting central: making distributed meetings more effective , 2004, CSCW.

[18]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems? , 1990, CSCW '90.