Agent-based simulation of affordance-based human behaviors in emergency evacuation

Abstract Complex cognitive processes corresponding to human control behaviors cannot be easily inferred using (1) a logical rule-based model, (2) a statistical model, or (3) an analytical predictive model. Predicting human behaviors in complex and uncertain environments like emergency evacuation is considered almost impossible (at least NP hard) in systems theory. In this paper, we explore simulating human behaviors using affordance-based finite state automata (FSA) modeling, based on the ecological concept of affordance theory. To this end, we introduce the conceptual and generic framework of affordance-based human behavior simulation developed through our previous work. Following the generic framework, formal simulation models of affordance-based human behaviors are developed, especially for emergency evacuation, to mimic perception-based dynamic human actions interacting with emergent environmental changes, such as fire. A “warehouse fire evacuation” case is used to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed framework. The human action planning algorithms in the simulation model are developed and implemented using the Adjusted Floor Field Indicators, which represent not only the evacuee’s prior knowledge of the floor layout but the perceivable information about dynamic environmental changes. The results of our simulation study verify that the proposed framework accurately simulates human fire evacuation behavior. The proposed framework is expected to capture the natural manner in which humans behave in emergency evacuation and enhance the simulation fidelity of analyses and predictions of perceptual human behaviors/responses in the systems by incorporating cognitive intent into human behavior simulations.

[1]  Christos G. Cassandras,et al.  Introduction to Discrete Event Systems , 1999, The Kluwer International Series on Discrete Event Dynamic Systems.

[2]  Aizhu Ren,et al.  Agent-based evacuation model of large public buildings under fire conditions , 2009 .

[3]  A. Schadschneider,et al.  Simulation of pedestrian dynamics using a two dimensional cellular automaton , 2001 .

[4]  W. Edwards The theory of decision making. , 1954, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  K. Ronald Laughery Computer simulation as a tool for studying human-centered systems , 1998, 1998 Winter Simulation Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36274).

[6]  Alex Kirlik,et al.  Supervisory control in a dynamic and uncertain environment: a process model of skilled human-environment interaction , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[7]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[8]  J. Gibson The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[9]  Ji Gao,et al.  Extending the decision field theory to model operators' reliance on automation in supervisory control situations , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[10]  Kathleen Segerson,et al.  RATIONAL ROOTS OF "IRRATIONAL" BEHAVIOR: NEW THEORIES OF ECONOMIC DECISION-MAKING , 1989 .

[11]  Ameya Shendarkar,et al.  Crowd simulation for emergency response using BDI agents based on immersive virtual reality , 2008, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[12]  Anand S. Rao,et al.  Decision Procedures for BDI Logics , 1998, J. Log. Comput..

[13]  Chengqi Zhang,et al.  Agent-Based Hybrid Intelligent Systems: An Agent-Based Framework for Complex Problem Solving , 2004 .

[14]  José Rogan,et al.  Cellular automaton model for evacuation process with obstacles , 2007 .

[15]  A. Newell Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[16]  Seungho Lee,et al.  Decision field theory extensions for behavior modeling in dynamic environment using Bayesian belief network , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[17]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.

[18]  Namhun Kim,et al.  Using finite state automata (FSA) for formal modelling of affordances in human-machine cooperative manufacturing systems , 2010 .

[19]  M. Turvey Affordances and Prospective Control: An Outline of the Ontology , 1992 .

[20]  John W. Payne,et al.  Contingent decision behavior. , 1982 .

[21]  Namhun Kim,et al.  Human Behavioral Simulation Using Affordance-Based Agent Model , 2011, HCI.

[22]  Benigno E. Aguirre,et al.  A Critical Review Of Emergency Evacuation Simulation Models , 2004 .

[23]  Namhun Kim,et al.  A modelling formalism for human-machine cooperative systems , 2011 .

[24]  Amit Konar,et al.  Reasoning and unsupervised learning in a fuzzy cognitive map , 2005, Inf. Sci..

[25]  Ling Rothrock,et al.  Affordance-based computational model of driver behavior on highway systems: A Colored Petri Net approach , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[26]  Claire Marrison,et al.  Effects of Motivation and Cabin Configuration on Emergency Aircraft Evacuation Behavior and Rates of Egress , 1996 .

[27]  Namhun Kim,et al.  An affordance-based formalism for modeling human-involvement in complex systems for prospective control , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference.

[28]  Richard A. Wysk,et al.  An investigation of a human material handler on part flow in automated manufacturing systems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[29]  Frederick Mosteller,et al.  An Experimental Measurement of Utility , 1951, Journal of Political Economy.