When should FDG‐PET be used in the modern management of lymphoma?

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a functional imaging technique that, combined with computerized tomography (PET‐CT), is increasingly used in lymphoma. Most subtypes accumulate fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and the increased sensitivity of PET‐CT, especially for extranodal disease, compared to CT, makes PET‐CT an attractive staging tool. The availability of a staging PET‐CT scan also improves the accuracy of subsequent response assessment. ‘Interim’ PET‐CT can be used to assess early response and end‐of‐treatment PET‐CT assesses remission. Clinical trials are currently seeking to establish whether the predictive value of PET‐CT can be successfully used to guide individual treatment to reduce toxicity and/or to improve outcomes. Standardized methods for performing and reporting PET have been developed in the context of trials. The role of PET in transplantation selection is currently evolving, as it appears to be more accurate and prognostic than CT. The role of FDG PET‐CT throughout the management course in patients with lymphoma is explored in this review, with areas discussed that may limit the use of PET‐CT imaging which clinicians should be familiar with to inform practice.

[1]  H. Eich,et al.  Modern radiation therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma: field and dose guidelines from the international lymphoma radiation oncology group (ILROG). , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  O. Casasnovas,et al.  In Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Determination of Bone Marrow Involvement with 18F-FDG PET/CT Provides Better Diagnostic Performance and Prognostic Stratification Than Does Biopsy , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  M. Federico,et al.  The use of FDG-PET in the initial staging of 142 patients with follicular lymphoma: a retrospective study from the FOLL05 randomized trial of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[4]  S. Barrington,et al.  PET-CT staging of DLBCL accurately identifies and provides new insight into the clinical significance of bone marrow involvement. , 2013, Blood.

[5]  R. Hicks,et al.  Limited role for surveillance PET–CT scanning in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in complete metabolic remission following primary therapy , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  K. Ardeshna,et al.  A response-adjusted PET-based transplantation strategy in primary resistant and relapsed Hodgkin Lymphoma , 2013, Leukemia.

[7]  H. Tilly,et al.  An international confirmatory study of the prognostic value of early PET/CT in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: comparison between Deauville criteria and ΔSUVmax , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[8]  J. Rowe,et al.  Strikingly high false positivity of surveillance FDG‐PET/CT scanning among patients with diffuse large cell lymphoma in the rituximab era , 2013, American journal of hematology.

[9]  Stephane Chauvie,et al.  International Validation Study for Interim PET in ABVD-Treated, Advanced-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma: Interpretation Criteria and Concordance Rate Among Reviewers , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  J. Min,et al.  Interim PET/CT-based prognostic model for the treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma in the post-rituximab era , 2013, Annals of Hematology.

[11]  A. Zelenetz,et al.  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the staging and prognosis of T cell lymphoma , 2013, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[12]  A. López-Guillermo,et al.  Interim FDG PET/CT as a prognostic factor in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[13]  B. Cheson Hodgkin lymphoma: protecting the victims of our success. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  G. Salles,et al.  Impact of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography response evaluation in patients with high-tumor burden follicular lymphoma treated with immunochemotherapy: a prospective study from the Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte and GOELAMS. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  J. Radford,et al.  Involved Field Radiotherapy Versus No Further Treatment in Patients with Clinical Stages IA and IIA Hodgkin Lymphoma and a ‘Negative’ PET Scan After 3 Cycles ABVD. Results of the UK NCRI RAPID Trial , 2012 .

[16]  J. Raemaekers,et al.  Interim Analysis of the Randomized Eortc/Lysa/Fil Intergroup H10 Trial On Early PET-Scan Driven Treatment Adaptation in Stage I/II Hodgkin Lymphoma , 2012 .

[17]  M. Bøgsted,et al.  Routine bone marrow biopsy has little or no therapeutic consequence for positron emission tomography/computed tomography-staged treatment-naive patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  R. Bouabdallah,et al.  Positron emission tomography response at the time of autologous stem cell transplantation predicts outcome of patients with relapsed and/or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma responding to prior salvage therapy , 2012, Haematologica.

[19]  H. Amthauer,et al.  Reduced-intensity chemotherapy and PET-guided radiotherapy in patients with advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HD15 trial): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial , 2012, The Lancet.

[20]  S. Ferrero,et al.  Interim 18-FDG-PET/CT failed to predict the outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated at the diagnosis with rituximab-CHOP. , 2012, Blood.

[21]  A. Zelenetz,et al.  Normalization of pre-ASCT, FDG-PET imaging with second-line, non-cross-resistant, chemotherapy programs improves event-free survival in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2012, Blood.

[22]  C. Copie-Bergman,et al.  Interim [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy plus rituximab. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  H. Eich,et al.  Role of [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in early and late therapy assessment of patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma treated with bleomycin, etoposide, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine and prednisone , 2012, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[24]  Andrew Homb,et al.  Prognostic significance of FDG-PET in relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma treated with standard salvage chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. , 2011, Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

[25]  T. Habermann,et al.  Patients Enrolled in the Gimema Lal 0496 Protocol Presentation and Correlation with Response to Induction Treatment in Adult T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Biologic Profile At , 2005 .

[26]  J. Coya,et al.  Diagnostic value of CT, PET and combined PET/CT performed with low-dose unenhanced CT and full-dose enhanced CT in the initial staging of lymphoma. , 2011, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....

[27]  P. Zinzani PET in T-Cell Lymphoma , 2011, Current hematologic malignancy reports.

[28]  M. Hutchings Pre-transplant positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma: time to shift gears for PET-positive patients? , 2011, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[29]  M. Trněný,et al.  Pre-transplant positron emission tomography in patients with relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma , 2011, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[30]  G. Salles,et al.  Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) after induction therapy is highly predictive of patient outcome in follicular lymphoma: analysis of PET-CT in a subset of PRIMA trial participants. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  B. Coiffier,et al.  SUVmax reduction improves early prognosis value of interim positron emission tomography scans in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. , 2011, Blood.

[32]  Yen-Kung Chen,et al.  F-18 FDG PET for Evaluation of Bone Marrow Involvement in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Meta-analysis , 2011, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[33]  Sang-We Kim,et al.  Limited role of interim PET/CT in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP , 2011, Annals of Hematology.

[34]  R. Coleman,et al.  Early post transplant (F-18) 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography does not predict outcome for patients undergoing auto-SCT in non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin lymphoma , 2011, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[35]  J. Min,et al.  Prognostic significance of interim ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT after three or four cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy in the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. , 2011, European journal of cancer.

[36]  A. Zelenetz,et al.  FDG-PET in the staging and prognosis of T-cell lymphoma. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[37]  I. Steffen,et al.  Evaluation of interim PET response criteria in paediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma--results for dedicated assessment criteria in a blinded dual-centre read. , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[38]  R. Gascoyne,et al.  Impact of concordant and discordant bone marrow involvement on outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[39]  A. LaCasce,et al.  End-of-treatment but not interim PET scan predicts outcome in nonbulky limited-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[40]  H. Johnsen,et al.  Efficacy of routine surveillance with positron emission tomography/computed tomography in aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma in complete remission: status in a single center , 2011, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[41]  Ö. Kapucu,et al.  Early post-transplantation positron emission tomography in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma is an independent prognostic factor with an impact on overall survival , 2011, Annals of Hematology.

[42]  P. Marsden,et al.  Establishment of a UK-wide network to facilitate the acquisition of quality assured FDG-PET data for clinical trials in lymphoma. , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[43]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Midtreatment 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron‐emission tomography in aggressive non‐Hodgkin lymphoma , 2011, Cancer.

[44]  R. Houot,et al.  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography before, during and after treatment in mature T/NK lymphomas: a study from the GOELAMS group. , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[45]  Andrew Homb,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT for Early Response Assessment in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Poor Predictive Value of International Harmonization Project Interpretation , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[46]  C. Bodet-Milin,et al.  Prognostic value of interim FDG PET/CT in Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients treated with interim response-adapted strategy: comparison of International Harmonization Project (IHP), Gallamini and London criteria , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[47]  O. Paltiel,et al.  The role of routine imaging procedures in the detection of relapse of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma and aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma , 2011, Annals of Hematology.

[48]  R. Miceli,et al.  Pretransplantation [18‐F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan predicts outcome in patients with recurrent Hodgkin lymphoma or aggressive non‐Hodgkin lymphoma undergoing reduced‐intensity conditioning followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation , 2010, Cancer.

[49]  I. Riphagen,et al.  Added Value of Baseline 18F-FDG Uptake in Serial 18F-FDG PET for Evaluation of Response of Solid Extracerebral Tumors to Systemic Cytotoxic Neoadjuvant Treatment: A Meta-Analysis , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[50]  J. S. Júnior,et al.  18F-FDG PET After 2 Cycles of ABVD Predicts Event-Free Survival in Early and Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[51]  A. D. Van den Abbeele,et al.  Surveillance imaging of Hodgkin lymphoma patients in first remission , 2010, Cancer.

[52]  M. Gönen,et al.  Characterization of T-cell lymphomas by FDG PET/CT. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[53]  A. Gallamini Positron emission tomography scanning: a new paradigm for the management of Hodgkin’s lymphoma , 2010 .

[54]  T. Nihashi,et al.  Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in response assessment before high-dose chemotherapy for lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2010, The oncologist.

[55]  J. Radford,et al.  Concordance between four European centres of PET reporting criteria designed for use in multicentre trials in Hodgkin lymphoma , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[56]  S. Mackinnon,et al.  Prognostic role of PET scanning before and after reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation for lymphoma. , 2010, Blood.

[57]  J. C. Meneghetti,et al.  Cost effectiveness of positron emission tomography in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma in unconfirmed complete remission or partial remission after first-line therapy. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[58]  U. Tateishi,et al.  SUVmax in FDG-PET at the biopsy site correlates with the proliferation potential of tumor cells in non-Hodgkin lymphoma , 2010, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[59]  Ora Israel,et al.  18F-FDG Avidity in Lymphoma Readdressed: A Study of 766 Patients , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[60]  W. Oyen,et al.  FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0 , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[61]  K. Jöckel,et al.  Positron emission tomography guided therapy of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas--the PETAL trial. , 2009 .

[62]  A. D. Van den Abbeele,et al.  CT and PET/CT findings of T-cell lymphoma. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[63]  J. Raemaekers,et al.  Development and application of a real-time on-line blinded independent central review of interim PET scans to determine treatment allocation in lymphoma trials. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[64]  P. Gaulard,et al.  Bone marrow involvement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: correlation between FDG-PET uptake and type of cellular infiltrate , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[65]  A. Rahmouni,et al.  Prognostic Value of Interim 18F-FDG PET in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: SUV-Based Assessment at 4 Cycles of Chemotherapy , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[66]  Michel Meignan,et al.  Report on the First International Workshop on interim-PET scan in lymphoma , 2009, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[67]  J. Leonard,et al.  Combined PET and low-dose, noncontrast CT scanning obviates the need for additional diagnostic contrast-enhanced CT scans in patients undergoing staging or restaging for lymphoma. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[68]  T. Pavlík,et al.  Value of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of follicular lymphoma: the end of a dilemma? , 2008, Clinical lymphoma & myeloma.

[69]  R. Hicks,et al.  FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY ON STAGING AND MANAGEMENT OF EARLY-STAGE FOLLICULAR NON-HODGKIN LYMPHOMA , 2022 .

[70]  M. Mancini,et al.  Role of whole-body [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and conventional techniques in the staging of patients with Hodgkin and aggressive non Hodgkin lymphoma , 2008, La radiologia medica.

[71]  N. Magné,et al.  Is FDG-PET scan in patients with early stage Hodgkin lymphoma of any value in the implementation of the involved-node radiotherapy concept and dose painting? , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[72]  Emmanuel Itti,et al.  Early 18F-FDG PET for Prediction of Prognosis in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: SUV-Based Assessment Versus Visual Analysis , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[73]  T. Akhurst,et al.  Limitations of CT During PET/CT , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[74]  F. d'Amore,et al.  Early interim 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography is prognostically superior to international prognostic score in advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: a report from a joint Italian-Danish study. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[75]  M. Kojima,et al.  The usefulness of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET) and a comparison of (18)F-FDG-pet with (67)gallium scintigraphy in the evaluation of lymphoma: relation to histologic subtypes based on the World Health Organization classification. , 2007, Cancer.

[76]  S. Pileri,et al.  Histological verification of positive positron emission tomography findings in the follow-up of patients with mediastinal lymphoma. , 2007, Haematologica.

[77]  Sigrid Stroobants,et al.  Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[78]  Klemens Scheidhauer,et al.  Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[79]  G. Salles,et al.  Clinicopathologic characteristics and outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas presenting with an associated low-grade component at diagnosis. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[80]  P. Veit-Haibach,et al.  Cost-effective therapy remission assessment in lymphoma patients using 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography: is an end of treatment exam necessary in all patients? , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[81]  C. Portlock FDG-PET after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts treatment failure and Progression-free survival in Hodgkin’s lymphoma , 2006 .

[82]  T. Nazeer,et al.  Role of fluorine‐18 fluoro‐deoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan in the evaluation and follow‐up of patients with low‐grade lymphomas , 2006, Cancer.

[83]  J. Matthews,et al.  The prognostic impact of bone marrow involvement in patients with diffuse large cell lymphoma varies according to the degree of infiltration and presence of discordant marrow involvement , 2006, European journal of haematology.

[84]  M. O'Doherty,et al.  FDG-PET after two to three cycles of chemotherapy predicts progression-free and overall survival in high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[85]  Emmanuel Itti,et al.  [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in aggressive lymphoma: an early prognostic tool for predicting patient outcome. , 2005, Blood.

[86]  Y. Erdi,et al.  Intensity of 18fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in positron emission tomography distinguishes between indolent and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[87]  J. Vose,et al.  Response assessment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma by integrated International Workshop Criteria and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[88]  N. Mikhaeel,et al.  Prognostic value of interim FDG-PET after two or three cycles of chemotherapy in Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[89]  Thomas F Hany,et al.  Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin disease: coregistered FDG PET and CT at staging and restaging--do we need contrast-enhanced CT? , 2004, Radiology.

[90]  G. Cook,et al.  Pitfalls and artifacts in 18FDG PET and PET/CT oncologic imaging. , 2004, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[91]  B. Beuthien-Baumann,et al.  Substantial impact of FDG PET imaging on the therapy decision in patients with early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[92]  A. Alavi,et al.  Utility of FDG-PET scanning in lymphoma by WHO classification. , 2003, Blood.

[93]  M. O'Doherty,et al.  Limitations of PET for imaging lymphoma , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[94]  P. Dupont,et al.  Early restaging positron emission tomography with ( 18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose predicts outcome in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[95]  P. Dupont,et al.  Prognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) after first-line chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: is [18F]FDG-PET a valid alternative to conventional diagnostic methods? , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[96]  S. Hain,et al.  2-Fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D glucose positron emission tomography in the pretreatment staging of Hodgkin's disease: influence on patient management in a single institution. , 2000, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[97]  M. O'Doherty,et al.  PET scanning and the human immunodeficiency virus-positive patient. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[98]  M. Maisey,et al.  FDG‐PET screening for cerebral metastases in patients with suspected malignancy , 1996, Nuclear medicine communications.

[99]  F. d'Amore,et al.  Patient-reported symptoms are still the single most important factor for detecting lymphoma relapse , 2013 .

[100]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Early interim 18F-FDG PET in Hodgkin’s lymphoma: evaluation on 304 patients , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[101]  M. Mancini,et al.  Role of whole-body (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and conventional techniques in the staging of patients with Hodgkin and aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma , 2009 .

[102]  Martin Hutchings,et al.  FDG-PET after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts treatment failure and progression-free survival in Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2006, Blood.

[103]  A. Nagler,et al.  Is CT scan still necessary for staging in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients in the PET/CT era? , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[104]  F. d'Amore,et al.  Position emission tomography with or without computed tomography in the primary staging of Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2006, Haematologica.

[105]  Y. Lacasse,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of positron emission tomography for the management of potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer in Quebec. , 2005, Canadian respiratory journal.

[106]  Notes for guidance on the clinical administration of radiopharmaceuticals and use of sealed radioactive sources. Administration of Radioactive Substances Advisory Committee. , 2000, Nuclear medicine communications.