Knowledge Acquisition on Team Management Aimed at Automation with Use of the System of Organizational Terms

The aim of the paper is to present a new approach to knowledge acquisition on team management based on the original methodological concept called the system of organizational terms. The topic of knowledge acquisition on team management is important because of a lack of development in managerial work automation in recent years. The scientific problem is how to acquire knowledge on team management in the holistic, coherent and formalized way and how to represent team management in order to automate it. Both aspects of this scientific problem are described in this paper. On the one hand there is a common perspective met in management studies, and on the other hand also the original perspective of the system of organizational terms was presented. In the paper there is also a short description of a solution for this scientific problem and examples of previous research verifying the system of organizational terms as a method of knowledge acquisition on team management and team management representation aimed at automation this area of

[1]  Olaf Flak,et al.  Team Managers Representation and Classification Method Based on the System of Organizational Terms. Results of the Research , 2017 .

[2]  Varun Grover,et al.  The Chief Information Officer: A Study of Managerial Roles , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Cynthia M. Pavett,et al.  Managerial work: The influence of hierarchical level and functional specialty. , 1983 .

[4]  Marcin Grzegorzek,et al.  Action Sequence Matching of Team Managers , 2017, ICPRAM.

[5]  Luca Mari,et al.  The problem of foundations of measurement , 2005 .

[6]  Ajay Mehra,et al.  From Blue Sky Research to Problem Solving: A Philosophy of Science Theory of New Knowledge Production , 2011 .

[7]  A. Nankervis,et al.  Global Managerial Skill Sets, Management Development, and The Role of HR: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of North American and Indian Managers , 2013 .

[8]  Parvesh K. Chopra,et al.  On the science of management with measurement , 2011 .

[9]  Elements of knowledge management in the improvement of business processes , 2016 .

[10]  José L. Zalabardo.  Representation and Reality in Wittgenstein's Tractatus , 2015 .

[11]  Ricardo Chalmeta,et al.  Methodology for the implementation of knowledge management systems , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Common Ground and Coordination in Joint Activity , 2005 .

[13]  Mickaël Gardoni,et al.  FROM QUALITY MANAGEMENT TO KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT IN RESEARCH ORGANISATIONS , 2004 .

[14]  R. Kaiser,et al.  Differences in Managerial Jobs at the Bottom, Middle, and Top: A Review of Empirical Research , 2011 .

[15]  G. Midgley.  Science as Systemic Intervention: Some Implications of Systems Thinking and Complexity for the Philosophy of Science , 2003 .

[16]  Victor S. Sohmen,et al.  Leadership and Teamwork: Two Sides of the Same Coin , 2013 .

[17]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[18]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[19]  F. Shipper,et al.  A model and investigation of managerial skills, employees' attitudes, and managerial performance , 2002 .

[20]  Belal A. Kaifi,et al.  Organizational Behavior: A Study on Managers, Employees, and Teams , 2010 .

[21]  John J. Morse,et al.  Measuring the Process of Managerial Effectiveness , 1978 .

[22]  Fatema Amijee.  The Role of Attention in Russell's Theory of Knowledge , 2013 .

[23]  P. Aligica.  Prediction, Explanation and the Epistemology of Future Studies , 2003 .

[24]  Henri Fayol.  Administration industrielle et générale , 1999 .

[25]  Olaf Flak.  Theoretical Foundation for Managers' Behavior Analysis by Graph-Based Pattern Matching , 2013 .

[26]  Chris Brink,et al.  Three Dual Ontologies , 2002, J. Philos. Log..

[27]  K. Ambrose,et al.  Principles of management. , 2005, Emergency nurse : the journal of the RCN Accident and Emergency Nursing Association.

[28]  Celeste P.M. Wilderom,et al.  Values and behaviors of effective lean managers: Mixed-methods exploratory research , 2017 .

[29]  Why Intellectual Capital Management Accreditation is a Tool for Organizational Development ? , 2010 .

[30]  D. Ríos.  Models and Modeling in the Social Sciences , 2013, Perspectives on Science.

[31]  R. L. Katz.  Skills of an Effective Administrator , 2009 .

[32]  Per Darmer.  The subject(ivity) of management , 2000 .

[33]  E. H. Buttner,et al.  The Relationship between Styles of Creativity and Managerial Skills Assessment , 1999 .

[34]  Andrew P. McAfee,et al.  Human work in the robotic future , 2016 .

[35]  Olaf Flak,et al.  System of Organizational Terms as a Methodological Concept in Replacing Human Managers with Robots , 2019, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems.

[36]  A Heideggerian Perspective on the Relationship Between Mintzberg’s Distinction Between Engaged and Disconnected Management: The Role of Uncertainty in Management , 2011 .

[37]  B. E. Partridge,et al.  The Nature of Managerial Work , 1974 .

[38]  S. Tengblad,et al.  Is There a New Managerial Work? A Comparison with Henry Mintzberg's Classic Study 30 Years Later , 2006 .

[39]  David Woods,et al.  1. How to make automated systems team players , 2002 .

[40]  Mihalcea Alexandru,et al.  Management Skills Assessment Using 360° Feedback - Msf 360☆ , 2015 .

[41]  K. Praveen Parboteeah,et al.  Creativity in innovative projects: How teamwork matters , 2007 .

[42]  Alexander Backlund.  The definition of system , 2000 .