The Bounded Nature of Science: An Effective Tool in an Equitable Approach to the Teaching of Science

This chapter draws on three broad areas of scholarship—the nature of science, learning theory, and equitable science instruction—to argue for the educational importance of emphasizing the bounded nature of science in science teaching. It is well accepted that science education should focus both on the knowledge that science produces as well as “knowledge about science.” Likewise, we recognize that learning science is a difficult process that requires the actions of an engaged, active learner. Learning is now understood to be influenced by a host of extra-cognitive factors, such as motivation, interest, emotions, belief/acceptance, even identity. Equitable science instruction suggests that teachers should be aware of who they are teaching, knowing the critical intersections between science, school science, and the cultural backgrounds of the students themselves. Drawing from these three lines of inquiry, we describe how the bounded nature of science—the idea that science is limited in its scope by its reliance on methodological naturalism—is an important tool in the teaching of science. Through an emphasis on teaching how the scope of science is bounded by its assumptions, as can be accomplished through a consideration of pseudoscientific topics in the classroom, we argue that teachers can appropriately situate science as nonthreatening to students’ religious or cultural worldviews, thus fostering science learning.

[1]  J. Grandy SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING GRADUATES: CAREER ADVANCEMENT AND CAREER CHANGE , 1998 .

[2]  On the fruitful compatibility of religious education and science , 1996 .

[3]  M. Lauko,et al.  The Nation's Report Card[TM]: Trial Urban District Assessment--Science, 2005. NCES 2007-453. , 2006 .

[4]  Gale M. Sinatra,et al.  The "Warming Trend" in Conceptual Change Research: The Legacy of Paul R. Pintrich , 2005 .

[5]  Mike U. Smith Current Status of Research in Teaching and Learning Evolution: II. Pedagogical Issues , 2010 .

[6]  Sherry A. Southerland,et al.  Intentions and beliefs in students' understanding and acceptance of biological evolution , 2003 .

[7]  Sherry A. Southerland,et al.  Teaching Science to Every Child: Using Culture as a Starting Point , 2007 .

[8]  Michael Martin Pseudoscience, the paranormal, and science education , 1994 .

[9]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Restructuring Science Education: The Importance of Theories and Their Development , 1990 .

[10]  Okhee Lee,et al.  Science Curriculum and Student Diversity: A Framework for Equitable Learning Opportunities , 2008, The Elementary School Journal.

[11]  D. Hodson,et al.  Teaching And Learning Science , 1998 .

[12]  B. Andersson,et al.  Students' Understanding of the Greenhouse Effect, the Societal Consequences of Reducing CO2 Emissions and the Problem of Ozone Layer Depletion. , 2000 .

[13]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice , 1992 .

[14]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[15]  Patsye Peebles,et al.  Patterns of Conceptual Change in Evolution , 1996 .

[16]  THE SCIENCE QUESTION IN POSTCOLONIAL FEMINISM , 1995 .

[17]  A. Ahlgren,et al.  Science for all Americans , 1990 .

[18]  Okhee Lee,et al.  Research news and Comment: Teachers’ Roles in Promoting Science Inquiry With Students From Diverse Language Backgrounds , 1999 .

[19]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[20]  Mike Watts,et al.  Sources from a Somerset Village: A Model for Informal Learning about Radiation and Radioactivity. , 1997 .

[21]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning Project. , 1993 .

[22]  Sandra H. Fradd,et al.  Teachers' Roles in Promoting Science Inquiry with Students from Diverse Language Backgrounds. , 1999 .

[23]  M. Mitchell,et al.  High School Biology Teachers' Knowledge Structure, Acceptance & Teaching of Evolution , 2002 .

[24]  Mike U. Smith Counterpoint: Belief, understanding, and the teaching of evolution , 2007 .

[25]  L. Nadelson,et al.  K-8 Educators Perceptions and Preparedness for Teaching Evolution Topics , 2010 .

[26]  Jeannie Oakes,et al.  Lost Talent: The Underparticipation of Women, Minorities, and Disabled Persons in Science , 1990 .

[27]  G. Shankar,et al.  Emphasis given evolution and creationism by texas high school biology teachers , 1993 .

[28]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  TAKING SCIENCE TO SCHOOL: LEARNING AND TEACHING SCIENCE IN GRADES K-8 , 2007 .

[29]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Beyond Cold Conceptual Change: The Role of Motivational Beliefs and Classroom Contextual Factors in the Process of Conceptual Change , 1993 .

[30]  William F. McComas,et al.  Ten Myths of Science: Reexamining What We Think We Know About the Nature of Science , 1996 .

[31]  Gordon E. Uno Inquiry in the classroom , 1990 .

[32]  J. Lemke Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values , 1990 .

[33]  Francisco J. Ayala,et al.  Science, evolution, and creationism , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  L. Nadelson Preservice Teacher Understanding and Vision of how to Teach Biological Evolution , 2009, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[35]  Y. Bhattacharjee Florida Standards Support Evolution--With a Twist , 2008, Science.

[36]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Intentional Conceptual Change , 2003 .

[37]  Ross H. Nehm,et al.  Measuring knowledge of natural selection: A comparison of the CINS, an open‐response instrument, and an oral interview , 2008 .

[38]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  New Perspectives on Conceptual Change , 1999 .

[39]  Learning about biological evolution: A special case of intentional conceptual change , 2003 .

[40]  Lisa A. Donnelly,et al.  Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers: Toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution , 2008 .

[41]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural , 1998 .

[42]  Sherry A. Southerland,et al.  Individual and Group Meaning-Making in an Urban Third Grade Classroom: Red Fog, Cold Cans, and Seeping Vapor. , 2005 .

[43]  K. Stanovich,et al.  The domain specificity and generality of belief bias: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill. , 1999 .

[44]  Louis S. Nadelson,et al.  Development and Preliminary Evaluation of the Measure of Understanding of Macroevolution: Introducing the MUM , 2009 .

[45]  Charles W. Anderson,et al.  Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution , 1986 .

[46]  Kenneth A. Strike,et al.  A revisionist theory of conceptual change , 1992 .

[47]  Lawrence C. Scharmann Enhancing an Understanding of the Premises of Evolutionary Theory: The Influence of a Diversified Instructional Strategy , 1990 .

[48]  M. Bunge,et al.  Is religious education compatible with science education? , 1996 .

[49]  M. Zimmerman Only a Theory: Evolution and the Battle for America's Soul by Ken Miller, Viking, 2008 , 2008 .

[50]  Ricardo Nemirovsky,et al.  Everyday Matters in Science and Mathematics: Studies of Complex Classroom Events. , 2005 .

[51]  Deborah L. Hanuscin,et al.  Science Education and Student Diversity: Race/Ethnicity, Language, Culture, and Socioeconomic Status , 2013 .

[52]  Martin Stanisstreet,et al.  The ‘Greenhouse Effect’: children's perceptions of causes, consequences and cures , 1993 .

[53]  Michael L. Rutledge,et al.  Evolutionary Theory, the Nature of Science & High School Biology Teachers: Critical Relationships , 2000 .

[54]  Robert Tatina South Dakota High School Biology Teachers & the Teaching of Evolution & Creationism. , 1989 .

[55]  M. Gregoire,et al.  Is It a Challenge or a Threat? A Dual-Process Model of Teachers' Cognition and Appraisal Processes During Conceptual Change , 2003 .

[56]  J. Lucas,et al.  Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2009. , 2010, Vital and health statistics. Series 10, Data from the National Health Survey.

[57]  Steve Alsop,et al.  Beyond Cartesian dualism : encountering affect in the teaching and learning of science , 2005 .

[58]  W. McKeachie,et al.  Creationist vs. Evolutionary Beliefs: Effects on Learning Biology , 2002 .

[59]  Derek Hodson,et al.  Teaching and Learning about Science: Language, Theories, Methods, History, Traditions and Values , 2009 .

[60]  Ronald W. Marx,et al.  “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?”: Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science , 2001 .

[61]  Ron Good,et al.  Students' conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution: Cases of replication and comparison , 1995 .

[62]  W. W. Cobern Comments and criticism. Point: Belief, understanding, and the teaching of evolution , 2007 .

[63]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Abandoning the scientistic legacy of science education , 1988 .

[64]  Allan Feldman,et al.  Decision Making in the Practical Domain: A Model of Practical Conceptual Change , 2000 .

[65]  L. Francis,et al.  Shaping Adolescents' Attitudes towards Science and Religion in Northern Ireland: The role of scientism, creationism and denominational schools , 2001 .

[66]  S. Southerland Epistemic Universalism and The Shortcomings of Curricular Multicultural Science Education , 2000 .

[67]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Exploring Conceptual Change in Genetics Using a Multidimensional Interpretive Framework. , 1998 .

[68]  L. Delpit,et al.  The Skin That We Speak: Thoughts on Language and Culture in the Classroom , 2003 .

[69]  Vasilis Koulaidis,et al.  Models of students' thinking concerning the greenhouse effect and teaching implications , 1999 .

[70]  L. Delpit The Silenced Dialogue: Power and Pedagogy in Educating Other People's Children , 1988 .

[71]  Sarah K. Brem,et al.  Changing Minds? Implications of Conceptual Change for Teaching and Learning about Biological Evolution , 2008, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[72]  Cory A. Buxton Creating contextually authentic science in a “low‐performing” urban elementary school , 2006 .

[73]  Daniel P. Shepardson,et al.  Seventh grade students' conceptions of global warming and climate change , 2009 .

[74]  John F. Disinger,et al.  Environmental education research news , 1984 .

[75]  Elizabeth C. Doster,et al.  Managing the Conflict Between Evolution & Religion , 2000 .

[76]  Deborah R. Herget,et al.  Highlights from PISA 2006: Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Science and Mathematics Literacy in an International Context. NCES 2008-016. , 2007 .

[77]  Lawrence B. Flick,et al.  Scientific inquiry and nature of science : implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education , 2004 .

[78]  Marlene Schommer Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. , 1990 .

[79]  Norman G. Lederman Syntax Of Nature Of Science Within Inquiry And Science Instruction , 2006 .

[80]  Mike U. Smith,et al.  Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators , 1999 .

[81]  Eileen Carlton Parsons,et al.  The Black Cultural Ethos, Students' Instructional Context Preferences, and Student Achievement: An Examination of Culturally Congruent Science Instruction in the Eighth Grade Classes of One African American and One Euro-American Teacher , 2005 .

[82]  B. Zimmerman Academic studing and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective , 1998 .

[83]  R. Good,et al.  Students' Conceptual Ecologies and the Process of Conceptual Change in Evolution. , 1995 .

[84]  Michael Poole ‘... for more and better religious education’ , 1996 .

[85]  Harvey Siegel,et al.  Knowing, Believing, and Understanding: What Goals for Science Education? , 2004 .

[86]  T. Lord,et al.  How University Students View the Theory of Evolution. , 1993 .

[87]  D. Aguillard Evolution Education in Louisiana Public Schools: A Decade Following: Edwards v Aguillard , 1999 .

[88]  M. Brumby,et al.  Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students , 1984 .

[89]  Charles W. Anderson,et al.  Task Engagement and Conceptual Change in Middle School Science Classrooms , 1993 .

[90]  Sarah K. Brem,et al.  Perceived consequences of evolution: College students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory , 2003 .

[91]  Norman G. Lederman EJSE Editorial: The State of Science Education: Subject Matter Without Context , 1998 .

[92]  S. Southerland,et al.  Describing Teachers' Conceptual Ecologies for the Nature of Science , 2006 .

[93]  Norman Levitt,et al.  The flight from science and reason , 1996 .

[94]  Andrew Kohut,et al.  Scientific Achievements Less Prominent Than A Decade Ago Public Praises Science; Scientists Fault Public Media , 2009 .

[95]  Amy M. Hightower,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators , 1993 .

[96]  L. Nadelson,et al.  Educational Professionals' Knowledge and Acceptance of Evolution , 2009 .

[97]  Okhee Lee,et al.  Equity for Linguistically and Culturally Diverse Students in Science Education: A Research Agenda. , 2003 .

[98]  M. Stanisstreet,et al.  How do high school students perceive global climatic change: What are its manifestations? What are its origins? What corrective action can be taken? , 1993 .