Lignocellulosic biomass particle shape and size distribution analysis using digital image processing for pipeline hydro-transportation

Pipeline hydro-transportation has a significant potential to replace truck transportation of agricultural biomass for production of fuels and chemicals. Apart from several operating parameters, biomass particles' shape and size are key factors affecting biomass slurry (water–feedstock mixture) mechanical and chemical properties. Using an image processing approach and ImageJ software, a user-coded plugin was developed to process sample images, measure particle dimensions, and analyse the particle size distributions and corresponding parameters of knife-milled wheat straw and corn stover, which had been pre-classified into four nominal size groups. Particle surface roughness and its degradation during pumping time were also investigated. Investigation of the particle aspect ratio confirmed not only the minor importance of the “width parameter”, but also the significance of the fibrous nature of the test material in pipeline transportation. It was also observed that, the errors involved in nominal sizing brought about noticeable under- and over-estimation of the real dimensions of the particles. Amongst three size distribution functions of Rosin–Rammler, Gaudin–Schuhmann, and log-normal studied, the Rosin–Rammler equations were fitted with least error in all the scenarios. Comparison of Rosin–Rammler approach and size guide number model indicated that for the case of fibrous materials, the size guide number model was more reliable than the Rosin–Rammler approach. Finally, the impact of particle shape and size on biomass slurry mechanical behaviour was analysed.

[1]  Akh Kwan,et al.  Particle size distribution analysis of coarse aggregate using digital image processing , 1998 .

[2]  D. S. Yan,et al.  Mineral Processing Design and Operation: An Introduction , 2006 .

[3]  E. Perfect,et al.  Improved parameterization of fertilizer particle size distribution , 1998 .

[4]  Shahab Sokhansanj,et al.  Sieveless particle size distribution analysis of particulate materials through computer vision , 2009 .

[5]  Susan E. Powers,et al.  Models for Estimating Soil Particle-Size Distributions , 2002 .

[6]  Alvin R. Womac,et al.  Characterization of wheat straw particle size distributions as affected by knife mill operating factors. , 2011 .

[7]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Pipeline transport of biomass , 2004, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[8]  Gary K. Patterson,et al.  Drag reduction in solid‐fluid systems , 1975 .

[9]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Large-scale ethanol fermentation through pipeline delivery of biomass , 2005, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[10]  Geoffrey G. Duffy,et al.  Relationships between velocity profiles and drag reduction in turbulent fiber suspension flow , 1976 .

[11]  Benjamin Epstein,et al.  Logarithmico-Normal Distribution in Breakage of Solids , 1948 .

[12]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Pipeline transport and simultaneous saccharification of corn stover. , 2005, Bioresource technology.

[13]  Richard T Elander,et al.  Rheology of corn stover slurries at high solids concentrations--effects of saccharification and particle size. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[14]  L. Parent,et al.  Size Guide Number and Rosin¿Rammler Approaches to describe Particle Size Distribution of Granular Organic-based Fertilisers , 2003 .

[15]  Shahab Sokhansanj,et al.  Machine vision based particle size and size distribution determination of airborne dust particles of wood and bark pellets , 2009 .

[16]  Da-Wen Sun,et al.  Inspection and grading of agricultural and food products by computer vision systems—a review , 2002 .

[17]  T. C. Pearson,et al.  Camera Attachment for Automatic Measurement of Single-Wheat Kernel Size on a Perten SKCS 4100 , 2006 .

[18]  B. Dale,et al.  Global potential bioethanol production from wasted crops and crop residues , 2004 .

[19]  Stephen J. Symons,et al.  Determining Soya Bean Seed Size Uniformity with Image Analysis , 2006 .

[20]  P. Rosin The Laws Governing the Fineness of Powdered Coal , 1933 .

[21]  Bijan Shirinzadeh,et al.  An evaluation of surface roughness parameters measurement using vision-based data , 2007 .

[22]  K. Pye,et al.  GRADISTAT: a grain size distribution and statistics package for the analysis of unconsolidated sediments , 2001 .

[23]  Z. Li,et al.  A Novel Method of Object Identification and Leaf Area Calculation in Multi-leaf Image , 2007 .

[24]  W. Batchelor,et al.  Shape identification and particles size distribution from basic shape parameters using ImageJ , 2008 .

[25]  Clifton A. Shook,et al.  The effect of particle shape on pipeline friction for newtonian slurries of fine particles , 2000 .

[26]  Kelly N. Ibsen,et al.  Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover , 2002 .

[27]  Erik Flügel,et al.  Microfacies of Carbonate Rocks: Analysis, Interpretation and Application , 2004 .

[28]  Robert L. Folk,et al.  Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks , 1974 .

[29]  A. B. Metzner,et al.  Drag reduction in the turbulent flow of fiber suspensions , 1974 .

[30]  Alvin R. Womac,et al.  Biomass Pre-Processing Size Reduction with Instrumented Mills , 2007 .

[31]  R. Folk,et al.  Brazos River bar [Texas]; a study in the significance of grain size parameters , 1957 .

[32]  W. Gauvin,et al.  The turbulent flow characteristics of model fibre suspensions , 1965 .

[33]  Noel D.G. White,et al.  Image Analysis of Bulk Grain Samples Using Neural Networks , 2003 .

[34]  Alvin R. Womac,et al.  Interactive computer software development for leaf area measurement , 2006 .

[35]  W. Wang And J. Paliwal,et al.  Separation and identification of touching kernels and dockage components in digital images , 2006 .

[36]  M. Symons Seed sizing from images of non-singulated grain samples , 2005 .