A partial assessment of South Carolina's Project Safe Neighborhoods strategy: Evidence from a sample of supervised offenders

Since 2001, the federal Project Safe Neighborhoods initiative has instituted a comprehensive effort to reduce gun crimes in local communities across the United States. In South Carolina, the United States Attorney's Office for the District of South Carolina established Project CeaseFire, a localized response to reduce the prevalence of gun crime through targeted prosecution and increased public education. One element of Project CeaseFire was carried out by the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services. The current study utilized a quasi-experimental design to compare firearm-related incidents among a random sample of offenders under community supervision prior to and after the implementation of the SCDPPPS CeaseFire program. Although incidents involving a firearm were rare, the current results did not indicate a reduction in firearm-related incidents among offenders entering supervision after the SCDPPPS CeaseFire program was implemented. Instead, an increase in firearm incidents was observed after CeaseFire implementation. Possible explanations for the observed results are offered along with limitations to the study and policy implications.

[1]  Gary King,et al.  Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data , 2001, Political Analysis.

[2]  A. Piquero,et al.  Self-Control, Violent Offending, and Homicide Victimization: Assessing the General Theory of Crime , 2005 .

[3]  A. Piquero,et al.  Self-Control, Violent Offending, and Homicide Victimization , 2005 .

[4]  S. Decker,et al.  Project Safe Neighborhoods: Strategic Interventions Offender Notification Meetings: Case Study 2 , 2006 .

[5]  Travis C. Pratt,et al.  The Empirical Status of Deterrence Theory: A Meta-Analysis , 2006 .

[6]  A. Piehl,et al.  Problem-Oriented Policing, Deterrence, and Youth Violence: An Evaluation of Boston's Operation Ceasefire , 2001 .

[7]  Andrew V. Papachristos,et al.  Attention Felons: Evaluating Project Safe Neighborhoods in Chicago , 2007 .

[8]  Project Safe Neighborhoods Case Study Report: Southern District of Alabama , 2007 .

[9]  Nicholas Corsaro,et al.  Project Safe Neighborhoods and Violent Crime Trends in US Cities: Assessing Violent Crime Impact , 2010 .

[10]  Travis C. Pratt,et al.  Assessing Macro-Level Predictors and Theories of Crime: A Meta-Analysis , 2005, Crime and Justice.

[11]  P. Cook.  Research in Criminal Deterrence: Laying the Groundwork for the Second Decade , 1980, Crime and Justice.

[12]  Daniel S. Nagin,et al.  Criminal Deterrence Research at the Outset of the Twenty-First Century , 1998, Crime and Justice.

[13]  S. Pinker.  The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature , 2002 .

[14]  Richard Rosenfeld,et al.  Did Ceasefire, Compstat, and Exile Reduce Homicide? , 2005 .

[15]  R. Paternoster,et al.  The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and issues , 1987 .

[16]  Daniel S. Nagin,et al.  INTEGRATING CELERITY, IMPULSIVITY, AND EXTRALEGAL SANCTION THREATS INTO A MODEL OF GENERAL DETERRENCE: THEORY AND EVIDENCE* , 2001 .

[17]  C. Huff,et al.  Gangs in America , 1990 .

[18]  David Hemenway,et al.  Firearms and violence: a critical review , 2006, Injury Prevention.

[19]  Jens Ludwig,et al.  BETTER GUN ENFORCEMENT, LESS CRIME , 2005 .

[20]  Anthony A. Braga,et al.  Understanding and Preventing Gang Violence: Problem Analysis and Response Development in Lowell, Massachusetts , 2006 .

[21]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1997 .

[22]  D W Webster,et al.  Effects of undercover police stings of gun dealers on the supply of new guns to criminals , 2006, Injury Prevention.

[23]  C. Ronald Huff.  Gangs and Public Policy: Prevention, Intervention, and Suppression , 2002 .

[24]  Marc Gertz,et al.  THE MISSING LINK IN GENERAL DETERRENCE RESEARCH , 2005 .