A WIDER ACCOUNTABILITY? THE AUDIT OFFICE AND NEW ZEALAND'S BUREAUCRATIC REVOLUTION
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jonathan Boston,et al. Linking strategy and performance: Developments in the New Zealand public sector , 1997 .
[2] James F. Wilson. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It , 1990 .
[3] J. Wallis. Conspiracy and The Policy Process: A Case Study of the New Zealand Experiment , 1997, Journal of Public Policy.
[4] Carl Emmerson,et al. Rolling back the state , 2004 .
[5] R. Rhodes. THE HOLLOWING OUT OF THE STATE: THE CHANGING NATURE OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE IN BRITAIN , 1994 .
[6] Walter J.M. Kickert,et al. Public Governance in the Netherlands: An Alternative to Anglo‐American ‘Managerialism’ , 1997 .
[7] J. Nagel. What Political Scientists Can Learn from the 1993 Electoral Reform in New Zealand , 1994, PS: Political Science & Politics.
[8] Pat Walsh,et al. Public Management: The New Zealand Model , 1996 .
[9] K. Jacobs. VALUE FOR MONEY AUDITING IN NEW ZEALAND: COMPETING FOR CONTROL IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR , 1998 .
[10] M. Power. The audit society : rituals of verification , 1999 .
[11] C. Hood,et al. De-Sir Humphreyfying the Westminster Model of Bureaucracy: A New Style of Governance? , 1990 .
[12] G. Scott,et al. Reform of the Core Public Sector: New Zealand Experience , 1990 .
[13] P. Miller. Dilemmas of accountability: the limits of accounting , 1996 .
[14] J. Boston. Reshaping the state : New Zealand's bureaucratic revolution , 1993 .
[15] L. Parker,et al. A Quarter of a Century of Performance Auditing in the Australian Federal Public Sector: A Malleable Masque , 1999 .
[16] Shaun Goldfinch. Remaking New Zealand''s economic policy institutional elites as radical innovators , 1998 .