Knowledge management for small medium enterprises: capturing and communicating learning and experiences

With the increasing pressure for competitiveness on the construction organisations, it is necessary to capture, transfer and reuse project knowledge and use lessons learned from previous projects to improve project performance. Much of construction work is project-based, short-term and task-oriented; promoting a culture where continuous learning is inhibited. Specialist and technical knowledge is lost for one project to the next and arguably stifling an organisation’s ability to develop knowledge and generate new ideas. In this knowledge driven global economy, knowledge itself can be seen as a commodity that offers the only ‘true sustainable competitive edge’. If knowledge is effectively managed i.e. collected, structured and disseminated, it will bring significant benefit to organisations, with potential benefits to the wider construction industry. There are a plethora of knowledge management tools and solutions on the market. However, the increasing attention of knowledge management is unsurprisingly targeted at very large multinational organisations, with little at the small medium enterprises (SMEs); and even less at construction-related organisations. With over 99% of the construction industry in the UK made up of SMEs, these organisations are in need of knowledge management just as much as large enterprises in order to stay competitive. This paper attempts to present and discuss some of the findings from an on-going 18- months project, funded by the UK Department of Trade and Industry (DTI). The research project adopts a simple and yet robust approach in assisting SMEs to capture their learning experiences, explicate the significant knowledge embedded in the participants’ experiences; and transform it into knowledge accessible to a wider audience. In addition, the challenges participants face in their knowledge capture process will be highlighted. The paper will also reflect on the role of information technology (IT) in knowledge capture and communication in SMEs. Conclusions and recommendations for practice and for academia are documented.

[1]  Charles Egbu.  KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION SMES: COPING WITH THE ISSUES OF STRUCTURE, CULTURE, COMMITMENT AND MOTIVATION , 2005 .

[2]  M. Crossan.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[3]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[4]  Maria Mårtensson,et al.  A critical review of knowledge management as a management tool , 2000, J. Knowl. Manag..

[5]  Robert Aish.  Migration from an Individual to an Enterprise Computing Model and Its Implications for Aec Research (white Paper Submitted to the Berkeley-stanford Ce&m Workshop: Defining a Research Agenda for Aec Process/product Development in 2000 and Beyond) , 1999 .

[6]  Vicky Dougherty.  Knowledge is about people, not databases , 1999 .

[7]  David Smith,et al.  Debriefing in Experience-Based Learning. , 1986 .

[8]  Martin Betts,et al.  The suitability of IT as a tool to facilitate knowledge sharing in construction alliances , 2002 .

[9]  K Conheeney,et al.  Issues in knowledge transfer within a construction training and learning organisation , 2000 .

[10]  Klaus-Dieter Thoben,et al.  Barriers in Knowledge Management and Pragmatic Approaches , 2002 .

[11]  Karlheinz Kautz,et al.  Knowledge, learning and IT support in a small software company , 2001, ECIS.

[12]  E. Clark.  The Practice of Nursing Research: Conduct, Critique and Utilization, N. Burns, S.K. Grove. W B Saunders (1993), 818 pages, ISBN: 0 721 63 742 6 , 1995 .

[13]  Iris D. Tommelein,et al.  A knowledge management framework for project definition , 2002, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[14]  Scott P. Robertson.  A tale of two knowledge-sharing systems , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..

[15]  Charles Egbu,et al.  Information technologies for knowledge management: their usage and effectiveness , 2002, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[16]  N. Burns,et al.  The Practice of Nursing Research: Conduct, Critique, & Utilization , 1987 .

[17]  Charles Egbu,et al.  THE ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND MOTIVATION IN THE EFFECTIVE UTILIZATION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR TEAMWORKING IN CONSTRUCTION , 2001 .

[18]  Charles Egbu,et al.  The role of IT in strategic knowledge management and its potential in the construction industry , 2000 .

[19]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[20]  Ganesh D. Bhatt,et al.  Knowledge management in organizations: examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[21]  Geoff Parcell,et al.  Learning to Fly: Practical Lessons from one of the World's Leading Knowledge Companies , 2001 .

[22]  R. McAdam,et al.  A Critique Of Knowledge Management: Using A Social Constructionist Model , 2000 .

[23]  Olivier Corby,et al.  Methods and tools for corporate knowledge management , 1999, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[24]  Rodney McAdam,et al.  SME and large organisation perceptions of knowledge management: comparisons and contrasts , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[25]  S. Debowski.  Knowledge Management , 2005 .

[26]  Mark Dodgson,et al.  Innovation and Size of Finn , 1995 .

[27]  Syed Shariq,et al.  How does knowledge transform as it is transferred? Speculations on the possibility of a cognitive theory of knowledgescapes , 1999, J. Knowl. Manag..

[28]  Swee C. Goh,et al.  Managing effective knowledge transfer: an integrative framework and some practice implications , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..

[29]  John Sparrow,et al.  Knowledge management in small firms , 2001 .